Historical Elements in the Matsya Purana
by Chaitali Kadia | 2021 | 91,183 words
This essay studies the historical elements of the Matsya-purana: one of the typical eighteen Mahapuranas: Sanskrit texts that have recorded the ancient Indian cultural heritage, philosophy, religion, geography, etc. This Matsyapurana was originally written in 20,000 metrical verses and its content includes scientific topics such as architecture, de...
Synopsis
Chapter I: An Introduction of the ʳܰṇa
The ʳܰṇa are the most complete and authoritative exposition of Vedic knowledge. To know about our Indian culture, it is important to know about ʳܰṇa. In fact, ʳܰṇa is the bearer and carrier of culture. Almost all the rules of today society are influenced by the ʳܰṇa. Actually the ʳܰṇa is a collection of important narrative scriptures of the ancient Hindu, Buddhist and Jains. The ʳܰṇa discuss the history of the universe from creation to cataclysm, the genealogy of kings, warriors, sages and sub-gods, and Hindu cosmology, philosophy and geography. In the ʳܰṇa, a particular deity is usually predominant and shows the predominance of religious and philosophical thought. These texts are mainly in the form of anecdotes, which relate to more than one person. According to many scholars, the author of the Ѳٲ, Vyāsdeva is the complier of the ʳܰṇa. The most of ancient texts of the ʳܰṇa are connected with the contemporary Gupta Empire. Most of its elements relate to this period and its later centuries, according to historical or other sources. The ʳܰṇa were written in different parts of India. Some general ideas are noticed in the overall text of the ʳܰṇa. But it is difficult to explore the effect of one ʳܰṇa on another. So these are generally considered to be contemporary.
The composition date of the written text is not the actual composition date of the ʳܰṇa, because it can be said without a doubt that these stories have been spread orally for over a millennium. And later their shape and form were seen to change from the middle ages to the modern age.
Research on ʳܰṇa began when the All India Kashiraj Trust was formed under the patronage and supervision of Bibhuti Narayan Singh, Maharaj of Kashi. From this organization a critical edition of the ʳܰṇa and a magazine called “ʳܰṇam� had been published.
An ancient reference to the ʳܰṇa is found in the Chāndogya 貹Ծṣa, written in 500 BC (7/1/2). The Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa calls the ʳܰṇa as the �ʲñ Veda� (2/4/10, 4/1/2, 4/5/11). The Atharvaveda also mentions the word (11/7/14). 4
ʳܰṇa are not just religious texts. Apart from the deities and religious texts. ʳܰṇa, various philosophical thoughts have been described. Also a lot of information about the history, geography, economy and polities of ancient India is available from the ʳܰṇa. The ancient Indian social system and its customs are also a unique subject of the ʳܰṇa. Some of the ʳܰṇa contain descriptions of astrology, medicine, martial arts and weapons. Indian as well as foreign literature is also influenced by ʳܰṇa. Kālidās’s �ñԲ-śākuntalam� is influenced by the subject of the Padma-ʳܰṇa of the “Raghuvaṃśam� is written on the subject of the Brahmaܰna, Kālikā ʳܰṇa, Śiva ʳܰṇa and Skanda ʳܰṇa. The influence of ʳܰṇa can be seen in the books of Khemiśvar “Candakauśika� and Joydeva “Gītagovindam�. The ʳܰṇa are the significant creation of the Sanskrit literature. The contribution and influence of ʳܰṇa at every level of Indian society is undeniable. Directly or indirectly we depend on the ʳܰṇa.
In this work I have choose the Matsya ʳܰṇa and tried to specify what historical elements are in that ʳܰṇa. I have been divided the work into seven chapters to make it beautiful and easy. The chapters deal with the basic details of the ʳܰṇa, the relationship between the ʳܰṇa and the history, what is the historical element and its features, and the description of the historical elements of the Matsya ʳܰṇa.
The Veda is the main source of Indian culture as it reflects every time and everywhere in the Indian Culture entirely. The Veda helps us to choose the right way that should be done or should not be done. The Veda is auspicious which blesses us in all the step of our life. The Vedic thoughts are reflected in the ʳܰṇa. We don‘t realize the meaning of the Śܳپ without the ʳܰṇa. No one is considered as a learned without leaning the ʳܰṇa as no one knows the Sanskrit language without learning the ղ첹ṇa-ܻܳī.
The important thing is to know the etymology of word ʳܰṇa—�parati argre gacchatīti ܰ |�. The word ʳܰṇa is formed by the word �Pura�. ṇiԾ, 첹 even ʳܰṇa itself have represented the etymology of word “ʳܰṇa�. ṇiԾ described ʳܰṇa as �po bhavam� that means what happened in ancient period. The word ʳܰṇa is issued by the law of ṇiԾ named �ⲹṃcṃpԱٴ'vyaryabhyaṣṭyu� yulau tu� ca .�
According to Ѳṣi Yaska the ʳܰṇa means �ܰ Բ� bhavati �(nirukta 3 /9 /34 )�. On the other side the etymology of ʳܰṇa is �ܰ +ī +ḍa �. As per the ʳܰṇa the meaning of ʳܰṇa is �ܰ anati � which lived in the ancient period1. According to the Padma ʳܰṇa the meaning of word ʳܰṇa is �ܰ 貹貹� ṣṭ ܰṇa� tena tata , smṛtam |�. Brahmāṇḍa ʳܰṇa describes the meaning of world ʳܰṇa as �ܰ etat abhūt |� According to the Matsya ʳܰṇa the word ʳܰṇa means �ܰṇasya kalpasya ܰṇāni vidurvudhā |� Ჹܻ has described ʳܰṇa as �ܰ pūrvasminakāle � |� In Sanskrit literature ʳܰṇa means ancient. ʳܰṇa or Purāvarta is a history after Vedic period.
The ʳܰṇa describes itself as ancient. From the Vedic Period the scholars have mentioned the ʳܰṇa in their treatises. Even Veda, itself has indicated the description of ʳܰṇa.
There are two models of ʳܰṇa–one is a subject of many ancient studies and the other as a literature. To get the ancient depiction of the ʳܰṇa we must search the many Vedic literature, like Brāhmana, ṃh, 貹Ծṣa etc. we get many usages of word ʳܰṇa in the many mantras of ṻ岹. The word “ʳܰṇa� is mentioned as a meaning of ancient in the Ṛg-mantra 3/58/6, 10/130/6 and the other side ʳܰṇa is used as an adjective form of word �ٳ�.
In the Atharvaveda the word “ʳܰṇa� is mentioned with the word “Nārāsangsī�, “ٳ� and �پŨ�
sa vṛhatī� diśamanuṣyacalat || 10 ||
tamitihāsaśca ܰṇa� ca gāthāśca
rāśasīścānuvyacalan || 11 ||
itihāsasya ca sa vai ܰṇasya ca gāthā� ca |
raśaṃsī� ca ⲹ� 峾 bhavati , ya eva� veda || 12 |
�atharva , 25 , 1 , 6
The Atharvaveda says that the ʳܰṇa origin with other Vedas�
ṛc� 峾Ծ Իṃs ܰṇa� yajuṣ� saha |
ucchiṣṭājjajñire sarve divi devā diviśritā� || 6
�atharvaveda 22 /3 /4
The antiquity of ʳܰṇa is also proved by the ṇa literature. There are many usages of word ʳܰṇa in the Śٲ貹ٳ and Gopatha ṇa:
�evamime sarvevedā Ծ� 첹� � sabrāhmaṇāḥ sopaniṣatkā� setihāsā� sānvākhyātā� saܰṇāḥ �
Āranyaka & 貹Ծṣa are the last part of ṇa. We also get the usages of ʳܰṇa in the Āranyaka and 貹Ծṣaa�
�ⲹñ 첹ṇe-yad brāhmaṇāītihāsān ܰṇani kalpāna gāthā rāśaṃsī ....�
�ṛg岹� bhagabo Sdhyemi ⲹܰ岹� sāmavedamātharvāṇa� caturthamitihāsaܰṇa� 貹ñ� vedam | �
Not only ṇa, Āranyaka and 貹Ծṣa but also the ūٰgrantha prove the presence of ʳܰṇa. By study the ʳܰṇa what kind of and how much virtue we can earn, all this knowledge is written in the ūٰ-grantha. There are many descriptions about reading ʳܰṇa in the mantra (3/23/34) of Āpastambadharmasūtra. The Ѳٲ also accepts the ʳܰṇa.
The application of ʳܰṇa is excess in the 徱 and ԳśԲ part of the Ѳٲ.�
ܰṇa� mānave � sāṅgovedaścikatsitam |
ājñāsiddhāni catvāri , na hantavyāni hetubhi� ||
�ԳśԲparva |pūrāṇe ho 徱 徱vaṃśāśca dhīmatām |
kathyante ye ܰsmābhi� śrutapūrvā� pitustava ||
�徱parva (5 /2 )
There are plenty of example of վṣṇ ʳܰṇa and ʳܰṇa in the Ѳٲ.
Like the Ѳٲ appliance of ʳܰṇa is very clear in the 峾ⲹṇa also.
ityuktvā turaha� sūto rājānamidamabravīt |
śrūyatā� yat ܰ屹ṛtٲ� ܰṇeṣu yathāśrutam ||
�bālakāṇḍa |
There are also many usages of ʳܰṇa in the �ṛtԳٳ �.
�ٲٰṣṭśīپ�sāhasrā munayo gṛhamedhina� |
punarāvartino bījabhūtā dharma -pravartakā� |�
The Sanskrit grammar also described about the ʳܰṇa.
According to the Ѳṣy�
�vākovākyamitihāsa� ܰṇa�
vaidyakamityetāvacchaṣdasya prayogaviṣaya� | �
Kautilya, the great politician in the ancient period also adopted the subject of ʳܰṇa for his ageless composition, the �Arthaśٰ�.
That is why we can see the use of ʳܰṇa in the “ArthaśٰŨ�
�mukhairavagṛhīta� vā Բ� tat priyāśrita� |
itiṛtٲܰṇābhyā� vodhayedarthaśٰvin || �
There are also mentioned the word “ʳܰṇa� in the Gautamdharmasūtra, and Vyāsaṛt�
�sa eva bahuśruto bhavati loka -veda -vedāṅgavit vākovākyetihāsaܰṇakuśala | �10
The philosopher Śankarācārya has indicated the ʳܰṇa and its theory in the many places of his Sārīrakabhāṣya.
He has used the word Smṛti in the place of word ʳܰṇa.
�ܰṇe cātītāgatā� 첹貹� ca parimāṇamastīti sthapitam | �
Not only philosophy but also the Nītiśٰ, Dharmaśٰ and many ancient poets have used the appliance of ʳܰṇa.
The third quarter of the Dvāpra age is actual age of the ʳܰṇa according to the literary evidences of the 岵ٲ ʳܰṇa. We used the divine sources of origin of the ʳܰṇa to draw conclusion in this chapter. We made this point in the support of various views of various śٰs like Śrimad-岵ٲ, written by Bhakti Vedanta 峾 Prabhu 岹, Matsya ʳܰṇa, Visnu ʳܰṇa, Devi 岵ٲ ʳܰṇa, Kūrma ʳܰṇa, Vayu ʳܰṇa, Padma ʳܰṇa, Arthaśٰ etc. All the Śāstra gave the conclusion that the Vyāsadeva is the author of the eighteen Ѳ-ʳܰṇa.
In the old treatise the relation between the ʳܰṇa and “پ� is very deep that these two issues have been mentioned together as named پ-ʳܰṇa. Though پ is a different subject yet there is a wrong thought, that the ʳܰṇa is 8
پ. After words to overcome the complexity of the relationship between the ʳܰṇa and پ they are known as the two separate subjects. In the Chāndogya Upanisad Śankarācharya has cleared the difference between the ʳܰṇa and پ. Śankarācharya says that the ʳܰṇa and پ both are mentioned in the Veda.
�ܰśī , pururavasamaiṃḍa cakame � etc. the Śٲ貹ٳ ṇa (11/5/1/1) is considered as پ but �asadvā idamagra āsīt � etc. the description of creation is considered as the ʳܰṇa�
�itihāsa ityܰśīpuruvaso� saṃvād徱� �ܰśī �
ityadi brāhmaṇameva | ܰṇam �asadvā idamagra āsīdityadi�&Բ; ||
�śṅkṣy .
In a brief sense the ʳܰṇa describes not only the �Sarga�pratiSarga�ղṃśa–manvantarāni–vaṃśānucharitam� but also charity�pilgrimage–vow and the incarnations (). But the surface of history is different from the ʳܰṇa. پ narrates the ancient story. So, history belongs also a vast surface. پ is not only a narrator of the ancient incident but also پ learns us about the ancient social, economic, politics, religious and culture. The Atharvaveda has accepted the word “ʳܰṇa� at first to create some scripture in a mantra (15 /6 /10 ). There are also available the usages separately of word “ʳܰṇa� and “پ� in some ancient Vedic literature. Where somebody consider “پ� as a part of the “ʳܰṇa� , but somebody think that ʳܰṇa is a part of پ. Kautilya described in his “Arthaśٰ� that the پ is a sum of “ʳܰṇa-Itibṛtta-Ākhyāiykā-Udāharan-Dharmaśٰ-Arthaśٰ …�.…�
Characteristics is a main part of a subject that decide the importance of the subject. Characteristics say the inner subject of a topic. Exactly the same we know the subject matter of ʳܰṇa by its characteristics in brief. There are mentioned about the characteristics almost in all ʳܰṇa. Somewhere are mentioned five and somewhere are ten characteristics of ʳܰṇa.
According to the վṣṇ ʳܰṇa there are five characteristics of ʳܰṇa, named �ʲñṣaṇa�.
sargaśca pratisargaśca vaṃśa manvantarāni ca
vaṃśānucarita� caiva ܰṇa� pañcalakṣaṇam ||
The relation between ʳܰṇa and ʲñṣaṇa is so deep that this word “ʲñṣaṇa� is applied with the ʳܰṇa in the “Amarkoṣa� without any explanation and hesitation. The ʲñṣaṇa are–Sarga, PratiSarga, ղṃśa, Manvantara, ղṃśānܳٲ. ‘Sarga‘means the creation of the world. �Prati Sarga� means the disaster of the world. It is the opposite meaning of “Sarga�. The past, present and the future lineages of those kings which is created by the Lord Brahma, are called “ղṃśa�. Not only king but also the sage blood include in this ղṃśa. Manu, God, son of Manu, Indra, ٲṣi and the avataras of God, these period of six featured is called “Manvantara�. “ղṃśānܳٲ [ṃśānܳٲ]� means the description of dynasties and their origins.
On the other hand, there are ten characteristics of ʳܰṇa in the Śrīmad 岵ٲ and the Brahmavaivarta ʳܰṇa. The ten characteristics of two sides in the Śrīmad 岵ٲ by only in word not in meaning.
According to the 12th Skanda of the 岵ٲ the ten characteristics are�
sargaścātha visargaśca ṛtپ rakṣāntarāṇi ca |
vaṃśo vaṃśānucarita� saṃstha heturapāśraya� ||
Sarga means the creation of the universe. Visarga means the creation of life. For living life uses which material like rice, wheat etc. they are called as Vṛtti. Description of incarnations of ʲܰṣa is called 鲹ṣ�. Antarāṇi is the same subject of aforesaid Manvantarāṇi which explain the time of six characters that is Manu, ٱ𱹲, Son of Manu, Indra, ٲṣi and the Incarnation of Lord վṣṇ. ղṃśa is also the same thing which is said at first in the ʲñṣaṇa. ղṃśānܳٲm is also the same subject as ղṃśānܳٲm in the five characteristics. ṃsٳ means the opposite subject of Sarga, theory of creation. This is also the same subject of PratiSarga. Hetu means the cause of life and Apāśraya is the highest definition of Brahma.
On the other side there are also mentioned about the ten characteristics of ʳܰṇa in the last ten chapters of Śī岵ٲ’s second Skanda. The ten characteristics of this second Skanda is not different from the ten of the previous 12th Skanda. Rather they are synonymous. Differences are only verbal. The characteristics are�
atra sargo visargaśca ٳԲ� ṣaṇaūtaya� |
manvantareśānukathā nirodho muktirāśraya� ||
“Sarga�, “Visarga� is the same thing as aforesaid “Sarga�, “Visarga�. �ٳԲ [ٳԲ]� is the conquest of Lord ղṇṭ. �ʴṣaṇa [ṣaṇa]� means the grace or kindness of Lord վṣṇ. “Ūti� means desire for work. “Manvantara� is mentioned as a specific form of time. There are many explanations about the Purāṇic time in this part. Īśānukathā means the story about the God and his s. �Nirodha� means disaster. “Nirodha� and “Pratisarga� is the same issue. �Mukti� means the liberty from all earthen sorrow and Āśⲹ means Paramabrahma, the all mighty God. After death all the soul takes shelter in the Paramabrahma.
Not only Śrimad 岵ٲ but also Brahmavaivarta ʳܰṇa has described about the ten characteristics. From these all characteristics we can know about the total figure of the ʳܰṇa.
Before the discussion about the all ʳܰṇa, it is essential to classify the ʳܰṇa. There are so many opinions about classification of ʳܰṇa.
1. Some scholars have classified the ʳܰṇa in two parts on basis of their size�Ѳ ʳܰṇa and Upa-ʳܰṇa.
2. Some people have classified the ʳܰṇa according to the time. There are two parts also–one is �峦īԲ � and the another is �峦īԴdzٳٲ � . The �峦īԲ � ʳܰṇa are � , ṇḍ , matsya , 첹ṇḍⲹ , ṣṇ � ʳܰṇa. And the rest are �峦īԴdzٳٲ ܰṇa � .
3. According to the God there are three types of classification of ʳܰṇa they are–�ٱ첹 , Ჹ , 峾 � .
�ٱ첹 � ʳܰṇa are–�ṣṇ , īⲹ , śī岵ٲ , ḍa , padma , � etc. the six ʳܰṇa.
�Ჹ � ʳܰṇa are–�ṇḍ , brahmarvevartam , 첹ṇḍⲹ , ṣy , 峾Բ , brahma � etc.
�峾 � ʳܰṇa are -matsya , kurma , ṅg , ś , skanda , agni ʳܰṇa.
�sātvikeṣu ܰṇeṣu māhātmyamadhika� hare� |
rājaseṣu ca māhātmyamadhika� brahmaṇo vidu� ||
tadvadagneścamāhātmya� tāmaseṣu śsya ca |
saṅkīrṇeṣu sarasvatya� pitṛṇā� ca nigadyate || �
In this classification the all ʳܰṇa are equally divided in three parts �ٱ첹 , Ჹ , 峾 � . According to the Garuda ʳܰṇa the ٱ첹 ʳܰṇa are divided into three part–�ٱ첹muttamam � , �ٱ첹madhyamam � and �ٱ첹madhamam � |
It is considered that the number of ʳܰṇa are 18 from the ancient period. These 18 ʳܰṇa are mentioned almost in all ʳܰṇa.
According to Devi 岵ٲ the name of the 18 ʳܰṇa are�
� 屹ⲹ� 屹ⲹ� caiva ٰⲹ� vacatuṣṭayam |
apadlṅg -ku -Ծ -ܰṇāni pṛthakapṛthaka || �屹ⲹ� �matsya , 첹ṇḍⲹ
ٰⲹ� �brahma , ṇḍ , brahmavaivarta
a �agni
�rad
pad �padma
屹ⲹ� �岵 , ṣy
ٳṣṭⲹ� � , 峾Բ , , ṣṇ
li �ṃg
ku �karma
ska �skanda
ga -ḍa
These 18 ʳܰṇa are called as Ѳʳܰṇa. There are also mentioned about these 18 Ѳ-ʳܰṇa in the chapter 53 of Matsya-ʳܰṇa. The description of Ѳ-ʳܰṇa in the Matsya-ʳܰṇa are too brief but they are very useful evidence. There are an another sequence of the 18 Ѳ-ʳܰṇa in the վṣṇ-ʳܰṇa (3/6/20-24) & 岵ٲ (12/13/3-8)–�1) brahma , 2) padma 3)ṣṇ 4) ś 5) 岵a 6) īⲹ 7) 첹ṇḍⲹ 8) agni 9)ṣy 10) brahmavaivarta 11) � 12) 13) skanda 14) 峾Բ 15) ū 16) matsya 17) ḍa 18) ṇḍ �.
There are also 18 Upa-ʳܰṇa. We get the sequence of Upa-ʳܰṇa in many verses of ʳܰṇa. According to the Kūrma-ʳܰṇa�
ⲹ� sanatkumārokta� rasiṃhamabhāparam |
tṛtīya� skandamuddiṣṭa� kumāreṇa ca bhāṣitam ||
caturtha� śdharmāravya� sākṣānnandīśabhāṣitam |
durvāsasoktamāścarya� īⲹma� param ||
kapila 峾Բ� caiva tathaivośanaseritam |
brahmaṇḍa� vāruṇa� cātha hvayameva ca ||
ś� tathā śamva� saura� sarvārthasacayam |
parāśaroktamapara� ī� bhāskarāhvayam ||
The name of the Upa-ʳܰṇa are–�徱 , Բṃh , skanda , ś , ܰ� , īⲹ , kapila , 峾Բ , śԲ , ṇḍ , ṇa , , ś , ś峾 , saura , ś , ī , 첹 . This name–sequence is also available in the Devī岵a, Skanda, Matsya, Garuda ʳܰṇa. But the other side there is another sequence of name in the Bṛhatviveka. The sequence is �Բٲܳ , īⲹ , vṛhanīⲹ , 徱tya , ūⲹ , ndikeśvara , kaurma , 岵a , ṣṭ , , mudgala , kalki , ī , 岵峾 , ṛh , 貹ԲԻ岹 , ṇi , ṃśa | �
Chapter II: Historical Elements
History is the study of the past in order to understand the meaning and dynamics of the relationship between cause and effect in the overall development of human societies. Its key feature is its broad range of inquiry, as it is as much concerned with wide perspectives, general explanations, and fundamental questions, as with specifies detail or event and the particular interpretation of sources and evidence. The claim of history is not so much its capacity to capture immense detail, or to record knowledge of the past, but to interpret, to handle a rich variety of sources in order to draw out their general relevance or to revel their general significance for human understanding of why and how change occurs. Few historians would context the view that history is not a science as a discipline of study, but is more a branch of the arts or humanities. It can be seen at most as a social science, and even they could not be defined a scientific in any exact or predictive sense.
Some opinion of different scholars or historians about the definition of history are as follows -according to R.G. Collingwood history is “a kind of research or enquiry� into “actions that have been done in the past�, conducted “by the interpretation of evidenceŨēevidence being further defined as documents. British historian E.H. Carr (1892-1982) has advised that history is not a single, well-defined, narrative or bundle of facts that can be memorized, but a terrain of contestation between completing and evolving interpretations whose influence is as much shaped 13
by time and place as by any given set of facts. According to Burckhardt “History is the record of what one age finds worthy of note in another.� Henry Johnson said “history in its broadest sense, is everything that ever happened.� On the other side according to the great historian V.S. Smith–“The value and interest of history depend largely on the degree in which the present is illuminated by the past.�
There are some divisions of History. The divisions depend on some subjects like date, time, period etc. By period history is divided into three parts�
i) Pre-historic Period (60,000 BC�650 AD)
ii) Post Classical Era (500�1500 CE)
iii) Modern History (1500 CE–Present)
By date also history is divided into three parts�
(i) Century, (ii) Decade and (iii) Periodization.
By time period there are also three divisions of history�(i) Pre-history in which include the stone age, the bronze age and the Iron age. (ii) Ancient history and (iii) Modern history. The classification of history also depend on some other subjects like by geographical region, by geographical sub-region, by religious by nation etc. There are also some different types of history which are classified by many field such as (i) family history, (ii) environmental history, (iii) local history, (iv) maritime history, (v) micro history, (vi) social history, (vii) urban history etc. In this modern sense today history has been divided into six different types�(i) Political history, (ii) Diplomatic history, (iii) cultural history, (iv) social history (v) economic history and (vi) intellectual history.
History is called as “ʲñ�-Veda�. History is a real fact what was happened in the ancient period. But it is a documentary topics and it is proved by which elements, they are called historical elements. History is not an imaginary or fictional stories, history is the story of the past. And to know the past some evidences are required. From which the evidences are found called historical elements. The elements or the sources of, or original authorities for, the early history of India may be arranged in four classes, the first of there is tradition, chiefly as recorded in native literature, the second consists of those writings of foreign travelers and historians which contain observations, on Indian subjects, the third is the evidence of archaeology, which may be subdivided into the monumental, the epigraphic, and the numismatic, and the fourth comprises the few works of native contemporary or nearly contemporary, literature which deal expressly with historical subjects. On the other 14
side we generally can divided the elements into six parts. They are coin, architectural, sculpture, various types of religious books, copperplate and travel stories of many travelers. We know about the emperor. Samudragupta by the “Alahabad� pillar inscription. We know about many Bactrian and Ś첹 kings by the coins. We also know about the Sātbāhanarāj by their silver coin. The �Harappa & Mahenjodaro� , the famous archaeological site also prove many historical facts in ancient period. We get many social images in that time by the “Bouddha-Jātakmālā� , the famous book. We know the ancient politics from the “Ārthaśٰ�, the ageless creation of Kautilya. Not only these books but the famous travel story like “Indika� by Megasthinis also tells us many histories. There are also many famous books like–Rājtarangiī by Kalhan, Rāmcarita by Sandhyākar Nandi, Gaurbāho by Bākpatirāj etc. ʳܰṇa are also a literary evidence as we get many historical information from the ʳܰṇa.
Chapter III: Historical Elements in the Ѳ-ʳܰṇa
As the ʳܰṇa are literary evidence of our Indian culture and history, all the ʳܰṇa are rich in various information. Though ʳܰṇa is a repository of various types of knowledge and information, among the subject history is that topic which is found in abundance in the ʳܰṇa. We can analyze the history described in ʳܰṇa by dividing them into three categories�(i) Geographical history, (ii) Cultural history and (iii) Human history.
All the historical information is contained in the “ʲñṣaṇa� of the ʳܰṇa. The geographical data of the ʳܰṇa is mostly described in their first two �ṣaṇa� which deal with cosmogony, cosmology and cosmography. They include among other related matters, the origin of the universe and the earth, the oceans and the continents, mountain systems of the world, regions and their people and astronomical geography. Incidental references to the geography of different lands, particularly those of ٲ, occur throughout the ʳܰṇa in the historical accounts contained in them. One has to put all the isolated facts together to get a picture of the lands and their people to which they refer or which they intended to describe. Like geographical data, cultural and human history of The Ѳ-ʳܰṇa are mostly described in their two “ṣaṇa� those are “ղṃśa� and “ղṃśānܳٲ�. Cultural history attaches the way of dealing with anthropology and history to point out popular cultural traditions and cultural expositions of historical experience. Cultural history 15
records and illustrates the past incidents involving people through the social, cultural and political atmosphere. In the Ѳ-ʳܰṇa dynastic tradition of different kings and sages at different times has been described as human history. Human history has been described in the ʳܰṇa based on the repetition of the old. And the authenticity of this history is proved by the inscriptions. Later on, the ʳܰṇa have enriched themselves day by day to collect various information of the dynasties.
i) Geographical History�
We know about the “Caturdvīpa� by the ʳܰṇa (Ch-34). There are also the descriptions about the �ٲ屹ī貹� in the վṣṇ ʳܰṇa (Ch-2/4), Bhāgvata ʳܰṇa (Ch-5/20) and Mārkaṇḍeya ʳܰṇa (Ch-546). We know about the Bhāratṣa from the ʳܰṇa (Ch-33/51�52), Mārkaṇḍeya ʳܰṇa (Ch-53/39�40), Bhāgvata ʳܰṇa (Ch-11/15�17). There are also descriptions of seven mountains, rivers and localities in the Kurma-ʳܰṇa (Ch-57), Brahmāṇḍa ʳܰṇa (Ch-49), Matsya ʳܰṇa (Ch-114), ʳܰṇa (Ch-45) and Vāmana ʳܰṇa (Ch-13) etc. Nine parts of Bhāratvarsa have been described in the Mārkaṇḍeya ʳܰṇa (Ch-13/11), ʳܰṇa (Ch-45/78), Vāmana ʳܰṇa (Ch-13/11) etc.
ii) Cultural History�
Many religious topics about the process of �Բ-ٳԲ-Vrata-Ś� are in the ʳܰṇa. We know about the ղṇa, پ, Social structure, family etc. from the ʳܰṇa. Also almost all ʳܰṇa contain the text about the marriage and position of women in the society. We know the process of Vrata (vow) from the Padma ʳܰṇa (Ch-6/53/4-6). There are descriptions “Ś� in the վṣṇ ʳܰṇa (Ch-3/14/22�23). We know about the �Ჹ� (duty of a king) from the Agni ʳܰṇa (Ch-218–Ch-237). We also know about the various types of վ (knowledge) from the ʳܰṇa. There are descriptions about the Ayurveda in the Garuda ʳܰṇa (Ch 146–Ch 202), Agni ʳܰṇa (Ch 279–Ch 286). From the Devībhāgvata (Ch 4–Ch 20), Śrimadbhāgvata (Ch 16–Ch 24) and Garuḍa ʳܰṇa (Ch 51–Ch 64) we know about the Astrology.
iii) Human History�
There are a huge information about the many ancient kings and their kingdoms, dynasties etc. in the ʳܰṇa. The Śrimadbhāgvata (Ch�9/12/5) and վṣṇ ʳܰṇa (Ch�4/4/48) describe about the ṣv dynasty. We can get the description of Paurava dynasty and the life style of that time from the վṣṇ ʳܰṇa (Ch�4/19/2�8), -ʳܰṇa (Ch-99/137�158) and Bhāgvata-ʳܰṇa (Ch-9/20/21�32). There are many vast chapters about the Maurya dynasty in the ʳܰṇa (Ch�99), Brahmaṇḍa ʳܰṇa (Ch�3), վṣṇ ʳܰṇa (Ch�4/24) and Bhaviṣya ʳܰṇa (Ch�12/1). We can get the information about the dynasties of ṛhٳ, Pradyota, Śiśuga, Nanda, Śunga, Kanva, Andhra from the Bhāgvata ʳܰṇa (Ch�12). In addition to these there are many descriptions about the many overseas races in the ʳܰṇa.
Chapter IV: Geographical History in the Matsya ʳܰṇa
Geographical history is the branch of history which studies the ways in which geographic phenomena have changed over time. It is a broadly synthetic discipline which shares both topical and methodological similarities with history, anthropology, ecology, geology, environmental studies, literary studies, and the other fields, Geographical history describes the geographical maps, climates etc. of ancient period. Many scholars have considered that there are the two parts of geographical descriptions–in the first one there are description about total world and the another part describes only about the India. The two parts are same important in the ʳܰṇa. We can notice that there are many geographical information in the Matsya-ʳܰṇa. In the ʳܰṇa “Bhubanakoṣa� is a very important subject. To understand about this it is essential to know about the “Meruparvata�, the centre of “Bhū-ṛtٲ�. It has been mentioned about the “Meruparvata� in the Matsya ʳܰṇa (Ch.113/14). After that there are mentioned about the “Caturdvīpa� (Four lands) in Matsya ʳܰṇa (Ch. 113/43-44). We get the description of “ٲ屹ī貹� (Seven lands) from the Matsya ʳܰṇa which are �ܻ屹ī貹, Gomedakavīpy, Sālmalidvīpa, ś屹ī貹, ñ屹ī貹, Ś첹dvīpa and ʳṣk屹ī貹. The chapter 122 of Matsya-ʳܰṇa has described about the Ś첹dvīpa. ܻ屹ī貹 has been described in the chapter 121 also. Also we know the information about the Kailasa mountain, seven branches of the river Ganga from the chapter 121 of the Matsya ʳܰṇa. The river Ganges is mentioned too in the chapter 114 of the Matsya-ʳܰṇa. There are descriptions of the Kuśadvipa, Kauñcadvipa and Śalmaladvīpa in the chapter 122 of this ʳܰṇa. The Gomedakadvīp and Puṣkaradvipa have been described in the chapter 123 of the ʳܰṇa. A huge description of the ٲṣa has been described in the Matsya-ʳܰṇa (Ch. 114/7). There are also many descriptions about the glory of our Indian sacred places in the Matsya ʳܰṇa, like śī (Ch-184), ṇa (Ch-180), Avimuktakṣetra (Ch-181, 182, 183), (Ch-186), sacred place near by the bank of river (Ch-190, 191, 194) and Śܰīٳ (Ch-192) etc. 17
Chapter V: Cultural History in the Matsya ʳܰṇa
Cultural history combines the approaches of anthropology and history to look at popular cultural traditions and cultural interpretations of historical experience. There are many cultural histories in the Matsya ʳܰṇa. It is very important part of the cultural information of the Matsya ʳܰṇa that is the description of social structure because society is the only thing by which culture is preserved. The Matsya ʳܰṇa describes about family in the chapter 131, 208�214, 100, 154, 155, 227 etc.
There are also descriptions about father, mother, son and daughter (Ch.-31, 32, 29, 28). Also the Matsya ʳܰṇa describes about women and their position in the society. Marriage is a very important subject in the Matsya ʳܰṇa. Matsya ʳܰṇa also contains about the exogamy-endogamy and �Niyoga� . The Matsya ʳܰṇa also narrates about the ղṇa system (Cast system) in the chapter 145. There are many useful descriptions on monarchy in the Matsya ʳܰṇa. After that Matsya ʳܰṇa describes about many Hindu rituals such as Ś, Բ, ٳԲ, Vrata and rules of many kind of worships of Gods and Goddess. The chapter 93 from which we know about the rituals of �Ұ-ŚԳپ� (Planet peace), and the chapter 264 in which we get many formalities to establish the God. The Matsya ʳܰṇa also describes about various types of Vrata (vow) like Adityaśayana Vrata (Ch-55), ‗Śrikṛṣṇāśtami Vrata (Ch-56), dzṇīcԻśⲹԲ Vrata (Ch-57), Anantatṛtīyā Vrata (Ch-62), Rasakalyaṇiī Vrata (Ch-63), Ārdrānandakarī Vrata (Ch-64), Akṣayatṛtiya Vrata (Ch-65) and Sārasvata Vrata etc. There are also many other descriptions of many Vratas like–Madanadvādaśī Vrata Nakṣatrapuraṣa Vrata, Sauvāgyaśayana Vrata, ٲīԲ貹Բ Vrata, Bhīmadvādaśi Vrata, Paṇyaśtī Vrata, Aśūṇyaśayana Vrata, Angāraka Vrata, ṇaٲī Vrta, վśǰ첹ٲī Vrata, Falasaptamī Vrata, Ś첹ٲī Vrata, ٲī Vrata, ѲԻٲī Vrata Śܲٲī Vrata, Viśokadvādaśī Vrata, Māheśvara Vrata, Sarvafalatyāga Vrata and Vibhūtīdvādaśī Vrata. Matsya-ʳܰṇa also contains about various types of Բ (donation) like–Gura dhenu dāna (Ch-82), Parvatadāna (Ch-83), Lavaṇacaladāna (Ch-84), Gura parvatakdāna (Ch-85), Sūvarṇācala dāna (Ch-86), Tilśailaka dāna (Ch-87), Kārpāsacala dāna (Ch-88), Ghṛtacala dāna (Ch-89), Ratcala dāna (Ch-90) and Rajatācala dana (Ch-91) etc. There are also some description of Ś in the chapters 15, 16, 17, 18 and 22 of Matsya-ʳܰṇa. In addition to these there are also some different subjects on culture like good or bad result of limb vibration (Ch-241), 18
good or bad result of dreaming (Ch-242 & 243), Construction of a Fort (Ch-217 & 218), Construction of a temple, garden, well and pond etc. (Ch-58).
Chapter VI: Human History in the Matsya ʳܰṇa
Human history is a part of history. It is the history of the human species from the planet earth. In the brief sense human history means the history of many kings, and their kingdoms. Not only the kings but the descriptions of sages and other historical person also are in the human history. Like cultural and geographical history there are plenty of human history too in the Matsya ʳܰṇa. In the chapter 11 of Matsya ʳܰṇa we find the description about the Solar and Lunar dynasty. There are a huge description of ṣv dynasty in the Matsya-ʳܰṇa. We also know about the Haihaya dynasty (Chapter-43), Turvasu dynasty (Ch-48/5) and Druhya dynasty (Ch-48/9) from the Matsya ʳܰṇa. We can get the description about the great character Bharata-Dauṣanti from this ʳܰṇa. The great dynasty, Kuru is also mentioned in this ʳܰṇa (Ch-90). After that the Matsya ʳܰṇa narrates about the Magadha empire.
According to the Matsya-ʳܰṇa�
�dvārtriśati nṛpā dyete bhavitāro ṛhٳ�
ūṇa -ṣa -sahasrantu teṣāṃ ⲹ� ṣyti || �
We know about the Śiśuga dynasty from this ʳܰṇa.
The Matsya ʳܰṇa says about the last king of Śiśuga dynasty, Ѳpadmananda�
� mahānandisutaścāpi śudrāyā� 첹첹� śᲹ�
utpatsyate mahāpadma� sarvakṣatrāntakonṛpa� ||
tata� prabhṛti rājāno bhaviṣyā� śūdrayonaya� |
ekarā� sa mahāpadma ekacchatro ṣyti ||
�matsyaܰṇa 171 /17 -18
We know also about the Nanda dynasty by the Matsya ʳܰṇa. The description of great Mourya dynasty is also available in the Matsya ʳܰṇa (Ch-272). Not only these but there are also a lot of narration about pre & post Mourya kingdoms like Śunga, ṛhٳ, and ĀԻ dynasty in the Matsya-ʳܰṇa. The description of great Pradyota dynasty occupies the place in the chapter 272 of the Matsya-ʳܰṇa.
There are also about the Kaśyap dynasty (Ch-6) and ʾ� dynasty (Ch-15) in the Matsya ʳܰṇa. Some clans of sages are also described in the Matsya-ʳܰṇa such as–clan of Ѳṣi ś첹 and his sons, Guru of demon -Śܰ峦ⲹ and his daughter Devyāī, clan of Ѳṣi Agastya and Vasiṣṭha, lineage of ṛg, clan of Ṛṣi Angirā, clan of Ṛṣi Atri, clan of Ѳṣi վ峾ٰ, clan of Ѳṣi Kāṣyapa, clan of Ṛṣi Vasiṣṭha, clan of Ṛṣi ʲś, and clan of Ṛṣi Pulaha, Pulastya and Kratu etc.
Conclusion
The historical elements in the Matsya ʳܰṇa are the main theme of this research work. The Matsya ʳܰṇa carries much information about the history. Not only the Matsya ʳܰṇa but also the all Maha ʳܰṇa carry much historical information. Some scholars had done some great works in this field. But yet the specific historical study of the Matsya ʳܰṇa has not done by anyone. So I have chosen the topic as my research work.
I have divided it into 6 chapters to make the research work easy and simple. Also at the beginning of the chapters a general introduction is given on the ʳܰṇa. Then the first chapter begins with the general features of ʳܰṇa and the definition of ʳܰṇa. This chapter deals with the information contained in various texts and according to various scholars. The second chapter deals with history and the elements of history. There are also explanations of how history and ʳܰṇa relate. The third chapter gives a brief description of the historical elements in the Ѳ ʳܰṇa. The fourth chapter describes the geographical history of the Matsya ʳܰṇa. The fifth chapter contains the explanation of the cultural history of the Matsya ʳܰṇa and the last chapter i.e. the sixty chapter contains the description of human history.
The specially of this research work is that in the Matsya ʳܰṇa different subjects have been described by different ways in different chapters, such as–geography, philosophy, society etc. I have tried to unravel the contents of history separately from it. Although the ʳܰṇa has changed all the time, I have tried to present the Indian history of that time from the perspective of the Matsya ʳܰṇa.
All the above discussions have been analyzed in our Ph.D. Thesis thoroughly. 20