365bet

The Agnistoma Somayaga in the Shukla Yajurveda

by Madan Haloi | 2018 | 109,416 words

This page relates ‘Part 1: An Introduction to the Shukla Yajurvedic Texts� of the study on the Agnistoma Somayaga as described in the Shukla Yajurveda (dealing with Vedic Rituals). The Agnistoma sacrifice (lit. “praise of Agni�) connects god with men and is performed in the spring season. It is the model of all the Soma sacrifices and forms a large and complicated ceremony preceded by four preliminary ritualistic days. This thesis deals with all the details involved in the Agnistoma sacrifice.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

Part 1: An Introduction to the Śܰ Yajurvedic Texts

Vedic religion is out and out ritualistic to its core. The religious practices of the Vedic people have been marked by the performance of numerous sacrifices big and small. Hence, when a student of the Vedas seeks to have understanding with the religion of the Veda it becomes imperative that the student should not only be familiar with the Vedic litanies and prayers but also with the sacrificial ceremonies in which these are employed. With this end in mind in this thesis an attempt has been made to have some insight into the procedures involved in the Ծṣṭdz dz岵 on which a large body of Soma sacrifices have been modeled. It is to be noted here that among the Vedic rituals it is the Soma sacrifice which stands above others by virtue of its rich diversity of rites ranging from a one-day sacrifice to a rite which covers a whole year. The ‘research design� chosen for this thesis is basically descriptive in nature which is expected to throw light on the institution of Ծṣṭdz sacrifice on the basis of data collected for this purpose. The study is based on the Yajurveda which primarily deals with the ritualistic practices which are pivotal to the fruitful accomplishment of a sacrifice. Furthermore for collection of data the texts of the ⲹԻ徱Բ Śܰ Yajurveda rather than those of the Black Yajurveda have been taken up. This is because in the former the mantra and the 󳾲ṇa portions have been carefully separated and arranged ‘deliberately as an improvement on the confusion of the ղٳپīⲹ and other texts� of the Black Yajurveda. This fact helps a better comprehension of the intricate practices involved in a sacrifice.[1] And the objective of this research work is to understand and recount those practices in a logical sequence so that one may have a clear picture of the institution of Ծṣṭdz dz岵.

The primary objective of this chapter is an introduction to the following major Śܰ Yajurvedic texts -

1.1.ᲹԱī ṃh
1.2.Śٲ貹ٳ 󳾲ṇa
1.3.ٲⲹԲ Śܳٲūٰ

Before proceeding with an appraisal of these texts, a general introduction about the Veda, the 󳾲ṇa and the ūٰ literature is presented as follows -

Vedas are the oldest literary monuments of the world which form the fountain head of Hindu religion. Whatever may be the data or record that one needs for studying Indian civilization can be found in the Vedas. Ancient Indian tradition looks upon these texts as sacred and are said to be divine revelation.e., emanation from the great Lord[2] due to which Vedas have been called 貹ܰṣeⲹ (not made by human being) and eternal. The authors of the Vedic Mantras are called seers i.e., visionaries. The seers visualized this divine revelation through their intense meditation.

The word veda has been derived from the root vid with either the suffix ñ or ac.[3] In the Գٲܻܳī under ܰ徱첹ṇa, four meanings of the root vid have been stated as follows

sattāyāṃvidyatejñānevetti, vintevicāraṇe /vindatevindatiprāptau �/[4]

Thus the root is expensive of the meanings viz., to be, to know, to deliberate and to obtain.It is possible to explain the significance of the word veda in all these senses. Veda is that which (a) deals with the questions of being and becoming, (b) an embodiment of knowledge par excellence, (c) deliberates the meanings of dharma and brahman and (d) it helps to gain esoteric knowledge which cannot otherwise be gained by an ordinary mortal. Ancient Indian tradition holds that only the Vedas can convey this esoteric knowledge, neither human perception nor human inference.

Thus it is said�

pratyakṣenānumityāvāyastūpāyo na budhyate /
enaṃvidantivedenatasmātvedasyavedatā //
[5]

According to ⲹṇa, Vedas provide the ܰ쾱첹ܱⲹ i.e., unworldly means for gaining desired objects and for avoiding harmful objects. ⲹṇa defines Veda as follows -

iṣṭyaprāptyaniṣṭaparihārayoralaukikamupāyaṃyograntho vedayatisa岹�//[6]

So far as the general contents of the Vedas are concerned Ᾱpastamba states that these are primarily made up of mantra and 󳾲ṇa.[7] Thus, the mantra and 󳾲ṇa are two integral parts of Veda. Of these two, the mantra portion is said to be earlier than the 󳾲ṇa portion. The mantra portion is found in metrical form and the 󳾲ṇa portion in the prose style. Commenting on the above mentioned statement of Ᾱpastamba, Kapardisvāmin states that both these portions are known as Veda because they enlighten the humans on the action which lead to the ultimate good.

The Vedas are four in number and these are the ṻ岹, the Yajurveda, the 峾岹 and the Atharvaveda.This chronological order of the four Vedas is found in the ԻDz 貹Ծṣa.[8] The Yajurveda has been handed down in two recensions viz., the Śܰ Yajurveda and the ṛṣṇa Yajurveda. The former contains only the sacrificial formulae in one hand, the later on the other hand, intermingles these sacrificial formulae with their explanations(󳾲ṇas). Each Veda consists of four component parts viz.,ṃh, 󳾲ṇa, Ᾱrṇy첹 and 貹Ծṣa. The mantra part of Veda is known by the name ṃh which contains litanies, benedictions etc. meant to glorify the gods as well as sacrificial formulae. The ṃh of the ṻ岹 is called Ṛkṃh, the ղٳپīⲹ ṃh and the ᲹԱī ṃh present the mantra portion of the ṛṣṇa Yajurveda and the Śܰ Yajurveda respectively. The Sāma ṃh belongs to the 峾岹 and the Atharva ṃh belongs to the Atharvaveda.

All the sacrificial formulae are gathered in the Yajurveda, hence ritualists call this Veda as 󾱳ٳپٳīⲹ of the other two Vedas viz., the ṻ岹 and the 峾岹 and these two Vedas are called ٰٳīⲹ by ⲹṇa in the introduction to his ղٳپīⲹsaṃhitābhāṣya�

ānupūrvāt karmāṇāṃ ū貹� yajurvede samāmnātam / yājyāpurṇovākyādayo ṛgvede samāmnāyante, stotrādīni tu sāmavede tathā sati ٳپٳī ⲹܰ岹�; ٰٳīⲹvitarau/[9]

The importance, significance as well as the application of the Mantras are dealt with in the theological treatises i.e., 󳾲ṇas. This 󳾲ṇa part of the Vedas indicates a vast literature including the Ᾱrṇy첹s and the 貹Ծṣas. The 󳾲ṇas get their designation owing to the fact that they explain the Mantras which in the Vedic texts have been referred to by the word brahman[10].Thus, the Śٲ貹ٳ says: brahma Գٰ�[11].

In the ܱǻ岵ٲ of the commentary of the ղٳپīⲹ ṃh, ⲹṇa has expressed the same opinion thus-

yadyapi mantrabrāhmanātmako 岹� tathāpi 󳾲ṇasyamantravyākhyānarūpatvāt Գٰ� evādau samāmnātā�/[12]

These 󳾲ṇa texts explain the significance and employment of Vedic Mantras, deal with various Vedic rites and focus on the mutual relation of the Mantras and the different Vedic rites. Over and above these, they contain linguistic and etymological discussions of Vedic words, myths, legends and philosophical speculation in order to support their explanations as well as their cosmogonic and theosophical theories. A minute observation of the entire 󳾲ṇa literature makes it clear that the 󳾲ṇas contain six main topics and these are vidhi, ٳ󲹱岹, ԾԻ, śṃs, ܰ첹貹 and 貹ṛt. But Savarsvāmi includes four more topics viz., hetu, śaṃsaya, vyāvadhāraṇakalpanā and ܱ貹Բ.[13]

Different 󳾲ṇas are attached to different Vedas. Accordingly, the ṻ岹 has two 󳾲ṇas viz., the Aitareya and the ṃkⲹԲ. The ղٳپīⲹ 󳾲ṇa belongs to the ṛṣṇa Yajurveda and the Śٲ貹ٳ 󳾲ṇa belongs to the Śܰ Yajurveda. The 峾岹 consists of nine 󳾲ṇas. These are the Pañcaviṃśa 󳾲ṇa, Ṣadviṃśa 󳾲ṇa, Jaiminīya 󳾲ṇa, Tavalkāra 󳾲ṇa, Sāmavidhāna 󳾲ṇa, Devatādhyāya 󳾲ṇa, Chāndyogya 󳾲ṇa, Ᾱrṣeya 󳾲ṇa and ղṃśa 󳾲ṇa. The Atharvaveda has only one 󳾲ṇa viz., the Gopatha 󳾲ṇa.

Moreover, the Vedic literature involves the ūٰ literature which is known as the ձṅg literature i.e., the texts ancillary to the Vedas. There are six Vedāṅgs i.e., six auxiliary sciences and these are Śṣ�, Kalpa, ղ첹ṇa, Nirukta, Chanda and dzپṣa. These ancillary texts are necessary for gaining mastery in Vedic lore.

The Muṇḍaka 貹Ծṣa for the first time mentions all these six ձṅgs

śikṣ� kalpo 첹ṇa� Ծܰٲ� chando jyotiṣamiti.[14]

From the point view of Vedic rituals the 貹ūٰ are of immense value. This is because, these texts are the compendiums of the rituals discussed in the 󳾲ṇas as well as of the customary laws that prevailed in ancient India. The main objective of this literature is to present the accounts of the sacredotal rituals in a systematic and concise manner in order to make them handy for the priests as well as the members of the society who seek to perform Vedic sacrifices. As the word ūٰ denotes the sense of extreme conciseness, hence, brevity is the main feature of this literature.

The 貹ūٰ consist of four types of literature viz., Śܳٲūٰ, Gṛhyaūٰ, Dharmaūٰ and Śūlvaūٰ. Out of these, the Śܳٲūٰs are directly connected with the Śܳٲ rites i.e., the rites dealt with in the śܳپ-śrutyuktayāgavidhiprakāśakāni śrautasūtrāṇi[15]. The Śܳٲūٰs are highly indebted to the 󳾲ṇas.This is because these texts have drawn their stock of subject matter from the 󳾲ṇas. The objective of the 󳾲ṇa literature is not merely to lay down the procedure of the rituals. They also deal with the ritualistic significance of the Mantras employed in the numerous sacrifices.And while doing so, they embark upon esoteric, mythical, mystical as well as etymological explanations of the words and sentences of the Mantras. As a result, the rules and regulations of the sacrifices presented in these works are interspersed with materials not directly related to the procedures of the sacrificial performance. The Śܳٲūٰs are the outcome of the efforts undertaken by the priests to preserve in a systematic way the rituals dealt with in the 󳾲ṇas. These works serve the practical purpose of unhindered and systematic understanding of the procedures involved in the performance of the rituals. To each Veda several Śܳٲūٰs have been attached. To the ṻ岹 belong the ᾹśvⲹԲ and ṃkⲹԲ Śܳٲūٰ. The ٲⲹԲ Śܳٲūٰ belongs to the Śܰ Yajurveda and ܻⲹԲ, Ᾱpastamba Satyāṣāḍa, Բ, 屹Ჹ,ղԲ belong to the ṛṣṇa Yajurveda. The ղԲ Śܳٲūٰ belongs to the Atharvaveda.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

A.B.Kieth, The Veda of the Black ۲� School, Entitled ղٳپīⲹ Sanhitā, Part.1, C.R. Lanman (ed.), p. IXXXVI

[2]:

cf., ٲٳ asya mahato bhūtasya niśvasitametadyadṛvgvedoⲹܰ岹ḥsāmavedo� tharvāṅgirasa�/, Śٲ貹ٳ 󳾲ṇa , 14.5.4.10

[3]:

cf.,vedaśabdaśca ‘vidajñāne� iti dhāto� sakāśātkaraṇārthīyañpratyayayogato�bhavat/ …kvacicca ‘nandigrahipacādibhyolyuṇinyaca�itipāṇinīyaūٰvihitācpratyayayogatah …vyutpāditodṛśyate/, ǻ岵ٲ of Sridhar Sharma, The Śٲ貹ٳ 󳾲ṇa according to the ⲹԻ徱Բ recension with the ձٳ󲹱śṣy of Sāyaṇācārya supplemented by the commentary of Ჹ峾, Vol.1, p.7

[4]:

Bhattoji Dikṣita, Srisa Chandra Vasu (ed.), The Գٲܻܳī, Vol. 2, 10.168, p. 472

[5]:

ǻ岵ٲ of ⲹṇa, ṛṣṇayujurvedīyataittirīya ṃh, Vol. 1, p. 3

[6]:

Ibid., p.2

[7]:

cf., mantra󳾲ṇayorveda峾dheyam/,Ā貹ٲ Śܳٲūٰ , 1.33

[8]:

ChUp., 7.1.2

[9]:

Baladeva Upadhyaya (ed.), The Veda ṣy ܳ ṃg, p.7

[10]:

cf., 󳾲ṇa� 󳾲ṇa� 貹첹Գٳ� asti,Jagadish Chandra Mishra, ղ徱첹ṅmⲹپ, p.140

[11]:

Śٲ貹ٳ 󳾲ṇa , 7.1.1.5

[12]:

Ibid., p.7

[13]:

Śavarsvāmin on Mimāmsāūٰ, 2.1.8

[14]:

MUp., 1.1.5

[15]:

Jagadish Chandra Mishra,op.cit., p.237.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: