Markandeya Purana (Study)
by Chandamita Bhattacharya | 2021 | 67,501 words
This page relates ‘Characteristics of Purana� of the study on the Markandeya Purana, one of the oldest of the eigtheen Mahapuranas preserving the history, civilisation, culture and traditions of ancient India. The Markandeyapurana commences with the questions raised by Rishi Jaimini (a pupil of Vyasa), who approaches the sage Markandeya with doubts related to the Mahabharata. This study examines various social topics such as the status of women, modes of worship, yoga, etc.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
1.3: Characteristics of ʳܰṇa
The ʳܰṇa are different in nature and their characters. The ʳܰṇa are having five-fold characteristics (貹ñṣaṇa) i.e. which contains the five different types of content, viz.
- sarga,
- pratisarga,
- ṃśa,
- manvantara and
- ṃśānܳٲ.
These characteristics are expressed in a single verse which is quoted in various ʳܰṇa including the 첹ṇḍⲹܰṇa as same or with slight variation thus�
sargaśca pratisargaśca vaṃśo manvantarāṇi ca /
ṃśānܳٲ� caiva ܰṇa� 貹ñṣaṇam //[1]
Here sarga means creation or evolution of the universe from its natural cause, pratisarga means recreation of the world from its constituent elements in which it is merged at the close of each kalpa, ṃśa means genealogies of Gods, demons, patriarchs, sages and kings, especially of the last two, manvantara means cosmic cycle each of which is ruled over by a Manu, the first father of mankind and ṃśānܳٲ which means accounts of royal dynasties. The Ծܰṇa also mentions five characters of the ʳܰṇa.[2]
The verse mentioning 貹ñṣaṇa of the ʳܰṇa is also found in the վṣṇܱܰṇa with the variation of the second line as�
sarveṣveteṣu kathyante ṃśānܳٲ� ca yat.[3]
All the ʳܰṇa do not completely agree with this definition. Some ʳܰṇa contain more subjects than these and some ʳܰṇa only touch these and deal with other topics. It is also seen that ʲñṣaṇa occupy but an insignificant part of the extant ʳܰṇa. Regarding the characteristics, the ʳܰṇa themselves state that the 貹ñṣaṇa is intended merely for the 貹ܰṇa and the Ѳܰṇa had to satisfy the 岹śṣaԲ.
The 岵ٲܰṇa also mentions ten characteristics of the ʳܰṇa as:
The 岵ٲܰṇa mentions the ten characteristics namely:
Here, sarga means primary creation, visarga means secondary creation, ṛtپ denotes means of livelihood, ṣ� means incarnation of God or protection, antara means reign of Manus, ṃsٳԲ means destruction of the world, final emancipation, hetu means ī, the unmanifested cause of creation, and lastly śⲹ means Brahman, the final resort.
The ٲܰṇa states that the 貹ܰṇa bear the five characteristics mentioned above[5] and the Ѳܰṇa bear the ten characteristics, viz.
- ṛṣṭi (primary creation),
- viṛṣṭi (secondary creation),
- sthiti (stability of creation),
- Բ (protection),
- 첹 (impression of past action),
- Գܱ (information about different Manus),
- ⲹṇa (description of the final dissolution of the world),
- ǰṣa-Ծū貹ṇa (showing the path to get rid of rebirth),
- hari-īٲԲ (discourses on hari) and
- devaīٲԲ (discourses on other Gods).[6]
These 岹śṣaṇa are dealt with in the Ѳܰṇa which possess ten characteristics including the adoration of վṣṇ and other gods individually, and also an account of ǰṣa[7] while the 貹ñṣaṇa prevail predominantly in the 貹ܰṇa.[8] The same view is also expressed by Śrīdharaswāmin, the commentator of the 岵ٲܰṇa.[9]
All these characteristics have their roots in the materials, viz. Բ (tales), upԲ (anecdotes), ٳ (songs) and kalpajoktis (that had come down through ages) which, as the ṇḍܰṇa, the ܱܰṇa, the վṣṇܱܰṇa say, were used by ղ in compiling the original ʳܰṇa.[10]
Thus it is clear that the characteristic features of the ʳܰṇa have no fixed rule. It has been floating and dynamic and texts have been subjected to numerous revisions, editions, omissions and modifications. So, it is observed that there should be the 貹ñṣaṇa as the minimum for a ʳܰṇa. Anything old may be the subject of a ʳܰṇa and it covers all the aspects of life.[11]
Footnotes and references:
[2]:
sargasya pratisargasya ṃśamanvantarasya ca /
vaṃśānucaritādeśca matsyakūrmādirūpadhṛk // Ծܰṇa, 1.14
[3]:
վṣṇܱܰṇa, 3.6.25
[4]:
[5]:
[6]:
[7]:
A.D. Gyani, Ծܰṇa, A Study, p. 9
[8]:
R. C. Hazra, Studies in the 貹ܰṇa, Vol. I, p.24
[10]:
ākhyānaiścāpyupākhyānair gāthābhi� kalpajoktibhi� /
ܰṇaṃh� cakre purāṇārthaviśarada� // ṇḍܰṇa, 2.34.21; վṣṇܱܰṇa, 3.6.16.
[11]:
A. D. Pusalker, Studies in Epics and ʳܰṇa, p.XIVII