365bet娱乐

1 M奴rcchan膩 (叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨)

啶むぅ啶� 啶氞ぞ啶� 啶曕�嬥す啶侧�� 啶�啷嬥�溹え啷�啶�啷� 啶�啷佮ぇ啷堗ぐ啷嵿え啶苦い啷嵿く啶� 啶曕�嵿ぐ啶�啷� 啶侧�曕�嵿し啷嵿く啶距え啷佮じ啶距ぐ啶む�� 啷�
啶膏�傕じ啷嵿ぅ啶�啷嵿く 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�涏え啶距�� 啶溹ぞ啶むた啶班ぞ啶椸き啶距し啶距う啶苦じ啶苦う啷嵿ぇ啶�啷� 啷�

tath膩 c膩ha 办辞丑补濒补岣� 测辞箩补苍墨测辞 budhairnitya峁� kramo lak峁�y膩nu蝉腻谤补ta岣� |
sa峁僺thapya m奴rchan膩峁� 箩腻迟颈谤腻驳补产丑腻峁Ｄ乨isiddhaye || 

鈥�(叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨, Chapter I, Gr膩ma尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 prakara峁嘺m, Anuccheda 61, p.82) 

The above citation of Kohala deals with the subject of the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 and has been translated by Prem Lata Sharma as follows:

鈥淪imilarly has said Kohala鈥斺�淭he order (of svaras) should always be arranged by the wise according to 濒补办峁�y补 (practice) for the sake of the accomplishment of 箩腻迟颈, 谤腻驳补 and the like, after having established the 尘耻谤肠丑补苍腻.鈥�^[1]

R. K. Shringy interprets 惭补迟补峁単补鈥檚 definition of a 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 saying that it fundamentally is a unit of seven notes in regular order of ascent and descent^[2]. There are seven 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s each belonging to the 峁�a岣峧补-驳谤腻尘补 and the 尘补诲丑测补尘补-驳谤腻尘补. More often than not, all the seven svaras of a 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 are not confined to a single octave. For instance in the 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 called 谤补箩补苍墨 would have the form鈥斺��ni sa ri ga ma pa dha鈥欌赌攚丑别谤别 ni would be in the mandra 蝉迟丑腻苍补 (register) and the rest of the notes in the madhya 蝉迟丑腻苍补. Some authorities like Kohala and 狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补 seem to have conceived of a form which will be inclusive of all the three 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉 at the same time. And according to them, this would aid in the practical presentations of 箩腻迟颈s, 谤腻驳补s and 产丑腻峁Ｄ乻. It is in this context that 惭补迟补峁単补 quotes the above verse of Kohala. In effect, Kohala says that an additional two svaras in the mandra 蝉迟丑腻苍补 and and three in the 迟腻谤补 蝉迟丑腻苍补 are to be included in a 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 in order to fix the minimum or standard range of performance of a 箩腻迟颈 or 谤腻驳补^[3]. 

The actual citation of Kohala, if considered out of context will appear meaningless. The verse does not even mention exactly what is to be included/ added (测辞箩补苍墨测辞). Kohala does not even mention the word 鈥�蝉迟丑腻苍补鈥�.

It is 惭补迟补峁単补鈥檚 惫峁泃迟颈 preceeding this verse that puts it in perspective and helps understand that Kohala is speaking on the subject of the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. 

啶むい啷嵿ぐ 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶距え啶苦ぐ啷嵿う啷囙ざ啶� 啶膏�嵿ぅ啶ㄠい啷嵿ぐ啶苦い啶�啶�啷嵿ぐ啶距お啷嵿い啷嵿く啶班�嵿ぅ啶�啶苦い啶� 啶掂�氞え啶距い啷�, 啶�啶ㄠ�嵿う啷嵿ぐ啶むぞ啶班じ啶苦う啷嵿ぇ啷嵿く啶班�嵿ぅ啶�啶苦い啶� 啶掂�氞え啶距�氞�嵿�� 啶︵�嵿さ啶距う啶多じ啷嵿さ啶班じ啶�啷嵿お啶ㄠ�嵿え啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶� 啶︵�嵿ぐ啶粪�嵿�熰さ啷嵿く啶距�� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶�啷嬥�椸�曕ぞ啶侧��

tatra 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻nirde艣a岣� sthanatritayapr膩ptyarthamiti vacan膩t, mandra迟腻谤补siddhyarthamiti vacan膩cca 诲惫腻诲补艣补svarasampann膩 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 dra峁ａ弓avy膩岣� prayogak膩le

鈥�叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 of 艢r墨 惭补迟补峁単补muni: 1992: p.82

On the other hand, the other verse which 惭补迟补峁単补 quotes in this context, i.e. the verse of 狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补, is much clearer. 狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补 says鈥�

啶︵�嵿さ啶距う啶多じ啷嵿さ啶班じ啶�啷嵿お啶ㄠ�嵿え啶� 啶溹�嵿�炧ぞ啶むさ啷嵿く啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶� 啶�啷佮ぇ啷堗�� 啷�
啶溹ぞ啶むた啶�啶距し啶距う啶苦じ啶苦う啷嵿ぇ啷嵿く啶班�嵿ぅ啶� 啶むぞ啶班ぎ啶ㄠ�嵿う啷嵿ぐ啶距う啶苦じ啶苦う啷嵿ぇ啶�啷� 啷�

诲惫腻诲补艣补svarasampann膩 j帽膩tavy膩 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 budhai岣� |
箩腻迟颈产丑腻峁Ｄ乨i蝉颈诲诲丑测补谤迟丑补峁� 迟腻谤补mandr膩disiddhaye ||

狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补 says almost the same thing that Kohala does, but his expression seems a lot clearer. He mentions that this 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 must have twelve svaras and also that the 迟腻谤补 and mandra are to be established. It appears from the verse of 狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补 that his purpose was to have access to all the three 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉. Twelve notes in a 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 have been incorporated with a view to include all three 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉 in the scale. In the case of Kohala, it is possible that the preceeding verse(s) in his work contained the relevant information which would put this particular one in much clearer light. In any case, 惭补迟补峁単补 does the needful by supplying the context and other information that are necessary to understand/ appreciate these words of Kohala. In Kohala鈥檚 verse there is no mention of 鈥�蝉迟丑腻苍补鈥� while in 狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补鈥檚 verse the purpose seems to have access to the tara and mandra 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉. Bharata too has stated that the purpose of murchana is too have access to the 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉^[4]. It is interesting to note that 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 completely ignores the concept of 诲惫腻诲补艣补svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻, whereas Kumbha, who is a later author mentions it.

The mention of the words 箩腻迟颈, 谤腻驳补 and 产丑腻峁Ｄ� here, are significant. Concepts of 谤腻驳补 产丑腻峁Ｄ� and such like are believed to belong strictly to the domain of the 诲别艣墨 tradition (fundamentally since Bharata and Dattila have not spoken about them). That would raise a question as to whether this mention of 谤腻驳补 and 箩腻迟颈 would be evidence enough to place Kohala as a 诲别艣墨 authority. Bharata, in his 狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补 does not touch upon the subject of 谤腻驳补s. 

But as Mukund Lath^[5] points out, Abhinavagupta, while commenting on the 29th chapter of the 狈腻峁瓂补艣补蝉迟谤补 says that by using the term 箩腻迟颈, Bharata has necessarily also included the 谤腻驳补s, 产丑腻峁Ｄ乻 within that framework. 

啶むじ啷嵿ぎ啶距う啶�啶�啶�啶苦お啷嵿ぐ啶距く啷� 啶�啷佮え啷囙�� 啷� 啶囙す 啶溹ぞ啶む�嵿く啶傕ざ啶曕�� 啶忇さ 啶�啶班ぎ啶距ぐ啷嵿ぅ啶む�� 啶膏ぎ啶膏�嵿い啶椸��啶むじ啶班�嵿さ啶膏�嵿さ啶� 啷� 啶むい啷嵿ぐ 啶灌た 啶班ぞ啶椸き啶距し啶距う啶�啷嬥お啷嵿く啶ㄠ�嵿い啶班�嵿き啷傕い啶距�� 啷�

tasm膩dayamabhipr膩yo mune岣� | iha j膩ty补峁兣沘k膩 eva param膩rthata岣� samastag墨tasarvasva峁� | tatra hi 谤腻驳补产丑腻峁Ｄ乨ayopyantarbh奴t膩岣� |

鈥�狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补 of Bharatamuni: 2006: Comm. on 29.8: GOS Vol IV: p. 70

Could it be possible that 谤腻驳补s and 产丑腻峁Ｄ乻 were also very much prevalent during the time of Bharata and were perhaps even included in the presentation of 苍腻峁瓂补? Bharata, as Abhinava points out might have felt that these are automatically included when he speaks of 箩腻迟颈, and therefore might have not seen the need to elaborate more on them. Kohala鈥檚 thoughts on 箩腻迟颈 are not available. Maybe he did not differ from Bharata, or perhaps he did not write on this at all. 

In the time of Bharata, there was no fixation of the tonic note. For instance, the starting note of the ni-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 and dha-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 would be of the same pitch. In that case, what is the role played by the 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉? Bharata says that when sa is the 补峁兣沘, then the 迟腻谤腻惫补诲丑颈 (top limit of the 迟腻谤补 蝉迟丑腻苍补) would be five notes above sa. By the time of Abhinavagupta, the concept had undergone much change and he says that when ma is the 补峁兣沘 svara, the 迟腻谤腻惫补诲丑颈 would be five svaras after the 迟腻谤补 sa. But even by the time of 惭补迟补峁単补鈥檚 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨, it appears that the system with a fixed tonic had come into being. The 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 was perhaps an outcome of the tonic getting fixed and arose in order to get access to the other 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉 also.

2 Dv膩da艣a-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻

啶�啷嵿ぐ啶�啷佮�曕�嵿い啷囙し啷� 啶� 啶むぞ啶班じ啷嵿ぅ啶� 啶粪ぁ啷嵿�溹ぞ啶︵�嵿く啶� 啶夃お啶�啷嬥�椸た啶ㄠ�� 啷�
啶呧い啷嵿ぐ 啶�啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶距�� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶距�� 啶︵�嵿さ啶距う啶多じ啷嵿さ啶班じ啶傕き啶掂ぞ啶� 啷� 啷┼カ啷� 啷�
啶�啶む�權�嵿�椸じ啷嵿い啶ㄠ�嵿ぎ啶む�� 啶ㄠ�堗�� 啶膏�佮え啷嵿う啶班�� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶むた啶�啶距い啶� 啶�啷� 啷�
啶呧い啷嵿ぐ啷堗さ 啶曕�嬥す啶侧ぞ啶氞ぞ啶班�嵿く啷� 啶ㄠえ啷嵿う啶苦�曕�囙ざ啷嵿さ啶� 啶忇さ 啶� 啷� 啷┼カ啷� 啷�
啶�啶む�權�嵿�椸ぎ啶ㄠ�佮じ啷冟い啷嵿く啷堗さ啷嬥�氞い啷佮じ啷嵿い啶︵た啶� 啶掂ぐ啷嵿ぃ啷嵿く啶む�� 啷�
啶︵�嵿さ啶距う啶多じ啷嵿さ啶班じ啶傕お啶ㄠ�嵿え啶� 啶溹�嵿�炧ぞ啶むさ啷嵿く啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶� 啶�啷佮ぇ啷堗�� 啷� 啷┼カ啷� 啷�
啶溹ぞ啶むた啶�啶距し啶距う啶� 啶膏た啶︵�嵿ぇ啷嵿く啶班�嵿ぅ啶� 啶むぞ啶班ぎ啶ㄠ�嵿う啷嵿ぐ啶距う啶苦じ啶苦う啷嵿ぇ啶�啷� 啷�
啶む�嵿ぐ啶苦じ啷嵿ぅ啶ㄠお啷嵿ぐ啶距お啷嵿い啶苦じ啶苦う啷嵿ぇ啷嵿く啶班�嵿ぅ啶� 啶︵�嵿さ啶距う啶多じ啷嵿さ啶班ぎ啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶� 啷� 啷┼カ啷� 啷�

prayukte峁�u na 迟腻谤补stha岣� 峁�a岣峧膩dy膩 upayogina岣� |
atra y膩 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻岣� pr膩ha 诲惫腻诲补艣补svarasa峁僢hav膩岣� || 352 ||
mata峁単astanmata峁� naiva 蝉耻苍诲补谤补峁� pratibh膩ti me |
atraiva kohal膩c膩ryo nandike艣vara eva ca || 353 ||
mata峁単amanus峁泃yaivocatustadiha var峁噛ate |
诲惫腻诲补艣补svarasa峁僷ann膩 j帽膩tavy膩 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 budhai岣� || 354 ||
箩腻迟颈产丑腻峁Ｄ乨i 蝉颈诲诲丑测补谤迟丑补峁� 迟腻谤补mandr膩disiddhaye |
tristhanapr膩pti蝉颈诲诲丑测补谤迟丑补峁� 诲惫腻诲补艣补svara尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 || 355 || 

鈥�(厂补峁単墨迟补谤腻箩补, G墨taratnako艣a, Svaroll膩sa岣�, Sth膩napar墨k峁�a峁嘺m, pp.124-125) 

The above mentioned verses occur in the context of the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. 惭补迟补峁単补 is the first to speak of this variety of 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. In the previous paragraph, 惭补迟补峁単补-s explanation of the concept of the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍补 has been dealt with. In the work 厂补峁単墨迟补谤腻箩补, 惭补丑腻谤腻峁嚹� Kumbha brings up this topic and says that when looked at from the perspective of practical singing, the 峁�a岣峧补 and other svaras of the 迟腻谤补 蝉迟丑腻苍补 of a 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 are not very functional/ advantageous. He says that this concept of 惭补迟补峁単补 does not appear very convincing to him. Here, Kumbha says that Kohal膩c膩rya and 狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补 have followed 惭补迟补峁単补 and proceeds to explain their opinion on the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. This definition is very much on the lines of what is seen in 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣颈. (Refer previous paragraph) 

The interesting aspect here is that Kumbha states that Kohala and 狈补苍诲颈办别艣惫补谤补 have followed 惭补迟补峁単补, where in fact, it is quite the other way around. It is 惭补迟补峁単补 who cites the authority of Kohala and Nandi in order to explain the concept of the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. This would put the authenticity of either one of these authors (on this subject) in question. Or, it is possible that the version of 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 which Kumbha had in his possession had some errors.

3 M奴rcchan膩 (Abhinavabharata蝉腻谤补蝉补峁単谤补丑补)

啶灌ぐ啶苦お啶距げ啷�啶�啷� 啶膏�嵿さ啶班ぞ啶｀ぞ啶�啶�啶� 啶膏お啷嵿い啶距え啶距�� 啶�啶ㄠ�嵿う啷嵿ぐ啶距う啶苦�曕�嵿ぐ啶�啶�啷嬥�椸い啶� 啷� 啷оオ啷� 啷�
啶�啶掂�囙う啶距ぐ啷嬥す啶掂ぐ啷嬥す啶曕�嵿ぐ啶�啷� 啶�啶� 啶� 啶む�� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶� 啷�
啶膏お啷嵿い 啶膏お啷嵿い 啶�啶掂え啷嵿い啷嵿く啷囙い啶距�� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶距じ啷嵿い啷嵿さ啷囙�曕さ啶苦�傕ざ啶むた啶� 啷� 啷оカ啷� 啷�
啶多�嵿ぐ啷佮い啷囙ぐ啷嵿ぎ啶距ぐ啷嵿う啶掂ぎ啷囙�曕じ啷嵿く啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啷囙い啷嵿く啶� 啶曕�嬥す啶侧�� 啷�
啶む�佮ぎ啷嵿が啷佮ぐ啷佮�� 啶椸ぞ啶�啶むぞ啶� 啶多�冟ぃ啷嵿さ啶むぞ啶� 啶氞ぞ啶�啶� 啶�啶掂�囙う啷嵿ぐ啶距�椸ぞ啶�啷冟い啶� 啶灌�冟う啷� 啷� 啷оカ啷� 啷�
啶�啶ㄠじ啷� 啶�啶溹�嵿�溹え啶� 啶�啶距い啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啷囙い啷嵿く啶� 啶曕�嬥す啶侧�� 啷� 啷оカ啷ㄠ�呧が啷� 啷�

harip膩l墨ye svar膩峁嚹乵api sapt膩n膩峁� mandr膩dikramayogata岣� || 149 ||
bhaved膩rohavarohakramo ya岣� sa tu 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 |
sapta sapta bhavantyet膩岣� 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻stvekavi峁兣沘ti岣� || 150 ||
艣ruterm膩rdavamekasy膩 m奴rcchanetyaha 办辞丑补濒补岣� |
tumburu岣� g膩yat膩峁� 艣峁涐箛vat膩峁� c膩pi bhavedr膩g膩m峁泃a峁� h峁沝e || 151 ||
manaso majjana峁� y膩ti m奴rcchanetyaha 办辞丑补濒补岣� || 152ab || 

鈥�(Abhinava-bharata-蝉腻谤补-蝉补峁単谤补丑补, p.140) 

Mumma岣峣 Cikkabh奴p膩la cites thes verses from Harip膩la鈥檚 work (厂补峁単墨迟补蝉耻诲丑腻办补谤补) explaining the views of Kohala on the subject of 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. He has quoted these verses from the works of Harip膩la and Tumburu. 

The first verse in the above extract, is preceeded by a complete delineation of Bharata鈥檚 explanation on the seven 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s of each 驳谤腻尘补. According to Harip膩la, Kohala says that the seven svaras exployed in order from the mandra 蝉迟丑腻苍补 in ascent and descent is called a 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. Each 驳谤腻尘补 has seven 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s which makes it a total of twenty one. This would mean that Kohala has accepted the 驳腻苍诲丑腻谤补 驳谤腻尘补 and also attributes seven 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s to it. It is interesting to note that Bharata has dealt only with the 峁�a岣峧补 驳谤腻尘补 and the madhyama 驳谤腻尘补. 惭补迟补峁単补 mentions the 驳腻苍诲丑腻谤补 驳谤腻尘补 but, according to the above verse of Harip膩la, Kohala also seems to have accepted the 驳腻苍诲丑腻谤补 驳谤腻尘补.  Regarding the line鈥斺��艣ruterm膩rdavamekasy膩 m奴rcchanety膩ha 办辞丑补濒补岣�鈥欌�攖he editor of Abhinavabharata蝉腻谤补蝉补峁単谤补丑补, R. Sathyanarayana has mentioned an alternate reading in a footnote. 

Based on the original manuscript of the work of Harip膩la, he presents the following reading鈥�

啶多�嵿ぐ啷佮い啷囙ぐ啷嵿ぎ啶︵え啶�啷囙さ啶膏�嵿く啶距え啷嵿ぎ啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啷囙い啷嵿く啶� 啶曕�嬥す啶侧��

艣rutermadanamevasy膩nm奴rcchanetyaha 办辞丑补濒补岣�

Even if either of the two readings (艣谤耻迟别谤-尘腻谤诲补惫补尘 or 艣谤耻迟别谤-尘补谤诲补苍补尘), the meaning seems only to be that鈥斺�榯he reduction of a 艣谤耻迟颈 is a 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻鈥�. It is not clear how the reduction of one 艣谤耻迟颈 is related to 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. The next citation is from Tumburu. Tumburu seems to give quite a non-technical definition of the term 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻. He says that 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 is that which brings great delight to the singer and the listener and it gets immersed in their minds. The two accounts are very different. But it has been seen that the term 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 has had different meanings in different works at different times.

4 惭奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻蝉 of 峁�a岣峧a Gr膩ma 

啶曕�嬥す啶侧�嬥そ啶�啶�
啶膏お啷嵿い啷堗さ 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶距ざ啷嵿�氞ぞ啶む�嵿ぐ 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶むた啶椸�嵿ぐ啶距ぎ啶� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶曕��啶班�嵿い啶苦い啶距�� 啷�
啶嗋う啶苦う啷嵿さ啶苦い啷嵿ぐ啶苦�氞い啷佮�冟お啶炧�嵿�氞し啶熰�嵿じ啶�啷嵿い啶膏�嵿さ啶距お啶� 啶むぞ 啶�啶むぞ啶� 啷� 啷�.啷�啷� 啷�
啶粪ぁ啷嵿�溹ぞ啶ㄠ�嵿え啶苦し啶距う啶距え啷嵿い啶� 啶ㄠ�囙じ啷嵿い啷� 啶оぞ啶ㄠ�嵿い啶� 啶оぞ啶む�嵿お啶距え啷嵿い啶�啶苦し啷嵿く啶む�� 啷�
啶�啶距え啷嵿ぎ啶距え啷嵿い啶� 啶�啶о�嵿く啶�啶距う啷嵿�椸ぞ啶ㄠ�嵿い啶� 啶椸ぞ啶ㄠ�嵿ぇ啶距ぐ啶距う啷� 啶嬥し啶�啶距え啷嵿い啶曕ぎ啷� 啷�
啶嬥し啶�啶距い啷嵿じ啶距え啷嵿い啶�啶苦い啷嵿く啶灌�佮�� 啶粪ぁ啷嵿�溹�椸�嵿ぐ啶距ぎ啶膏�嵿く 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿�氞�嵿�涏え啶距�� 啷� 啷�.啷�啷� 啷�

kohalo'pi
saptaiva 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻艣c膩tra prati驳谤腻尘补峁� prak墨rtit膩岣� |
膩didvitricatu岣�pa帽ca峁�a峁璼aptasv膩pi t膩 mat膩岣� || 1.80 ||
峁�a岣峧膩nni峁Ｄ乨膩nta峁� nestu dh膩nta峁� dh膩tp膩ntami峁�yate |
p膩nm膩nta峁� madhyam膩dg膩nta峁� g膩ndh膩r膩d 峁涐梗abh膩ntakam |
峁涐梗abh膩ts膩ntamityahu岣� 峁�a岣峧补驳谤腻尘补sya 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻岣� || 1.81 ||

鈥�(厂补峁単墨迟补苍腻谤腻测补峁嘺, Vol. I, p.38) 

This is a quotation from the work of Kohala which describes the seven 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s of the 峁�a岣峧补 驳谤腻尘补. The meaning of V. 1.80 cd is not clear, but perhaps it could mean that the 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s start on each of the seven svaras. Kohala says that each 驳谤腻尘补 has seven 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s. 

He goes to explain the formation of each of these.

i. 峁�a岣峧膩t ni峁Ｄ乨膩ntam -s r g m p d n;
ii. Ne岣� dh膩ntam -n s r g m p d;
iii. Dh膩t p膩ntam -d n s r g m p;
iv. P膩t m膩ntam -p d n s r g m;
v. Madhyam膩t g膩ntam -m p d n s r g;
vi. G膩ndh膩r膩t 峁涐梗abh膩ntam -g m p d n s r;
vii. 峁氠梗abh膩t s膩ntam -r g m p d n s;

Bharata mentions names such as 耻迟迟补谤补尘补苍诲谤腻, 谤补箩补苍墨, 耻迟迟补谤腻测补迟腻, 艣uddha 峁�a岣峧膩, 尘补迟蝉补谤墨办峁泃补, 补艣惫补办谤腻苍迟补 and 补产丑颈谤耻诲驳补迟腻 for the 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻s of the 峁�a岣峧补驳谤腻尘补. These names are not found in 厂补峁単墨迟补苍腻谤腻测补峁嘺. The same quotation is seen in 厂补峁単墨迟腻谤峁嘺惫补肠补苍诲谤颈办补^[6] of 狈墨濒补办补峁囜弓丑补. But this author does not make a direct reference to Kohala. He uses the term 鈥�笔补办峁Ｄ乶迟补谤补鈥� instead.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 of 艢r墨 惭补迟补峁単补muni: 1992: p.83

[2]:

厂补峁単墨迟补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补 of 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补: 1991: p.168

[3]:

叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 of 艢r墨 惭补迟补峁単补muni: 1992: p.182

[4]:

鈥�尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻迟腻苍补prayojanamapi sthanapr膩ptyartham |鈥欌�擝harata has stated that the object of musrcchan膩 and 迟腻苍补 are to get access to the 蝉迟丑腻苍补蝉. (狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补 of Bharatamuni: 2006: GOS Vol IV: p. 27)

[5]:

A Study of Dattilam: 1978: p.125

[6]:

厂补峁単墨迟腻谤峁嘺惫补肠补苍诲谤颈办腻: 1995: V.1.226-227: p 36