Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita (comparative study)
by Ranjni M. | 2013 | 54,094 words
This page relates ‘States of Experience� of study dealing with Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita. This thesis presents a comparative analysis of two non-dualistic philosophies, Pratyabhijna from Kashmir and Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta from Kerala, highlighting their socio-cultural backgrounds and philosophical similarities..
Go directly to: Footnotes.
5.5. States of Experience
Every individual in the universe experiences different states with respect of their activities. Advaita accepts four states of experiences, in which the ultimate self is the all-round experiencer. The four states are 岵 (waking state), Svapna (dreaming state), ṣuپ (state of deep-sleep state) and ճܰīⲹ (transcendental state). Among these the first three states are only belonged to the limited individual self and remain in the world. The fourth one is the ultimate experience, where the individual self is realized as the Supreme Self. ʰٲⲹñ also accepts these four states. According to ʰٲⲹñ, the waking state corresponds to the impure and dreaming state corresponds to the conscious nature and , dreamless is the pure knowledge level and the ճܰīⲹ is the ś level. ʰٲⲹñ accepts one more state Turyātītā, where one gets the Ś.
1. Waking State
Waking state may be useful for all purposes of life, but it cannot be regarded as the necessary self. Only after the experience one can realize the true nature of the beings in the world. The reason is that waking life is characterized by the duality of self and non-self, subject and object, doer and the act and so on. But the reality is non-dual. According to Advaita ձԳٲ waking life is illusory, because in higher states of consciousness the objects revealed by waking life come to be sublated.
2. Dreaming State
Dreaming cannot be the essential nature of the self, for it is found to be unreal on waking. Besides, dreaming is as much dualistic as the waking state is, in contrast with reality which is an undifferentiated unity. Again dreaming largely repeats the experiences of the waking state. In Svapna the ī is self manifested. With reference to the dream state the self luminosity of the self is mentioned in the ṛhṇyDZ貹Ծṣa.[1] ʰśԴDZ貹Ծṣa also put forth the same point.[2]
Even though the physical world is accepted as real in ʰٲⲹñ, like the Advaita Vedāntin, Utpala and Abhinavagupta describe the waking state and dreaming state as Bhrama (Illusory).
These are illusory similar to the vision of two moons because these seem as common to other subjects and exist in a short duration:
�.. svapnapadam | anyapramātṛsādhāraṇarūpādyābhāsānuṛtپta� kālāntarānanuvṛtterbhrāntireṣ� | sarvāntarbahiṣkaraṇaśaktyā sṛṣṭirjāgarā, tatrāpi pūrvavad dvicandrādiԳپ� |[3]
tadyadyapi yāvadbhāti tāvat tathaiva, tathāpyuttarakāla� prabuddhasya na tathā, -iti parāmarśena tadrūpa� nirmūlatvenāvabhāti, -iti bhrāntam | …tenobhayamapi bhrāntamucyate, bhrāntatvameva cāsthairyam | �.jāgradabhimatamapi vā dīrghadīrgha� kālāntare niścayānuṛtپrirodhāt jāgradantarāpekṣayā svapna eveti mantavyam |[4]
Śṅk also had used the same simile that seen used in ʰٲⲹñ: ekaścandra� sa dvitīyavaditi |[5] The general notion that ʰٲⲹñ accepts the reality of the mundane world in contrary to Śṅk, who considers it as illusory, is to be examined minutely. It seems that ʰٲⲹñ also accepts the illusoriness of the world by calling the waking state as Bhrama.[6]
101
3. State of Deep Sleep
Both systems equally accept the uniqueness of deep sleep, which is the state without any exuberance in livelihood of the universe. In dreamless sleep one gets a foretaste of what the state of self-realization may be. In this state the sleeper hasn’t any desires, sees no dreams and is beyond the state of subject-object distinction. It is a state in which all distinction swallowed up. In this time “the psychic states seem to cease functioning altogether—sense organs remaining in active. The associational as well as the perceptive aspects of mind seem to be conspicuous by their absence. One misses even the sense of I which recurs subsequently. It is a seeming blankness in experience.�[7]
ṇḍūDZ貹Ծṣa defined this state thus:
yatra supto na 첹ñԲ 峾� kāmayate na 첹ñԲ Բ� paśyati tatsuṣuptam |[8]
For the three states the sleep is common. So to distinguish this state from other two it is defined specially using the prefix su.[9] Hence it is a state beyond good and evil. ʰٲⲹñ defines the deep sleep as a state where the subtle body is resting like in the Pralaya.[10] It is a state of Ahantā, which is characterized by consciousness and the nature of action.[11] Abhinavagupta has mentioned various forms of deep sleep like , ū, Գ岹 and .[12]
4. Transcendental State
This is the real state where there is no dream, no object beyond any sense-experience and at the same time practicing the blissful nature of the pure consciousness. This state is reached by emptying the mind of all objects outer and inner. Thus this state shows the real reaching of self without knowing willing or feeling of the objects of universe.
ṛhṇyDZ貹Ծṣa describes the ճܰīⲹ state: where there is no dual nature for knowledge, being devoid of action, cause, effect, unspeakable, incomparable, indescribable what is that? It is impossible to say.[13] Śṅk has established the importance of this forth state saying that the ճܰī屹ٳ is nothing but the calm and blissful non-dual Brahman experience, where there are no distinctions:
In ʰٲⲹñ the ճܰīⲹ state also contains the egotism:
Here ʰٲⲹñ accepts one more state known as Turyātītā, beyond the fourth, where the Self is in վśٳ첹 ʲś form devoid of all differences.[16] K.C.Pandey rightly noticed that both these, Turya and Turyātītā, are two kinds of concentrated states, Samādhyavasthas.[17] The common individual selves are not the perceivers of these and these are experienced by the concentrated mind holders. Abhinavagupta says that these two are the states of īnmukta, the liberated while living. It is also called as 屹ś (unification with the Supreme).[18]
In both systems it is accepted that the individual self, who is in the middle of diverse subjects and objects in waking and dreaming states of the worldly life, gradually attains the transcendental state and realizes the non-dual Ultimate Reality through the advises of great teachers and self-contemplations.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
ٲⲹԳٲٲ� ⲹ� jyotirātmā svapne bhavatītyabhiprāya� |…�..…tasmātprasiddhyāpi svapne ⲹ�-jyotiṣṭvamasya gamyate | BUSB, 4.3.14.
[2]:
tasmādyuktā svapna ātmana� svayañjyotiṣṭvopapattirvaktu�, śruteryathārthatattvaprakāśakatvāt | PUSB, 4.5.
[6]:
Here the observations of Steven Jeffrey Kupetz are remarkable and are to be subjected to more investigations. He doubts whether Abhinavagupta is a crypto Vedāntin. See The Non-dualistic Philosophy of Kashmir Ś: An Analysis of the ʰٲⲹñ School, p. 89ff.
[7]:
[8]:
ṇḍūDZ貹Ծṣa, 5.
[9]:
[11]:
[12]:
Īśٲⲹñ-śԾ, 첹ī, Part II, p. 261.
[13]:
ṛhṇyDZ貹Ծṣa, 2.4.14.
[14]:
ѳṇḍDZ貹Ծṣa-śṅk-ṣy, 7.
[15]:
첹ī, Vol. II, p. 258.
[16]:
turyātīte dikkālānavacchede pūrṇe pravāhatā� hitvātinirbharāvastho vāyanasaṃstha� | Īśٲⲹñ-ṛtپ, 3.2.20; īԱ 109 tu bhede sarvavedyarīśirūpatattvabhūtabhuvanavargātmakadehavyapanarūpeṇa prāṇaṛtپrvyānarūpā viśvātmakaparamaśivocitā turyātītarūpā | Īśٲⲹñ-śԾ, 첹ī, Part II, p. 275.
[17]:
Abhinavagupta, p. 333.