Preksha meditation: History and Methods
by Samani Pratibha Pragya | 2016 | 111,074 words
This page relates ‘The Practice of Meditation on Liberated Souls (Siddhas)� of study dealing with Preksha-Dhyana: a meditation technique created by Acharya Shri Mahapragya (Acarya Mahaprajna) in the late twentieth century. It synthesizes ancient Jain ascetic methods, ritualistic practices, and modern scientific insights, appealing to a global audience. The thesis explores its historical context, theoretical foundations, and the rise of contemporary Jain meditation systems.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
3.1.3. The Practice of Meditation on Liberated Souls (Siddhas)
[Full title: Jayācārya’s Meditation (1) ḍ�-ٳԲ (Long Meditation) (3) The Practice of Meditation on Liberated Souls (Siddhas)]
Meditation on liberated souls is a traditional feature of Jaina practice for its soterological purpose. Jayācārya’s meditation on siddha has its presence in earlier texts like Ṣaṭkṇḍ岵 (Ṣaṭkṇḍ岵a, 13.5.4.29-31)[1], ٰⲹṃg (ٰⲹ-ṃg, 51) of Nemicandra. Ṣaṭkṇḍ岵 noting the siddha as the focus of meditation describes their qualities. ٰⲹṃg states, ‘He [siddha] has destroyed the eight karmas and the body, he is knower (and) perceiver of the world and the non-world. He has a human form, his soul is perfect. He abides at the top of the world. Meditate (upon him) (Dravya-ṃg, 51, tr. Balbir). He discusses it at length referring to the eight qualities of the siddha.
He writes:
This liberated soul (siddha) is free of birth, illness, death, grief, disease, sorrow, poverty, karma, doubt etc., with eight attributes present. He is always merged in the infinite happiness of the soul. He is free from the sticky black muddied world and the ocean of great affliction. On the liberated soul (siddha), meditate consciously with a focused and steady mind.[2]
This focus of meditation is to realise that one’s own true nature is similar to that of the siddhas: it is a kind of meditation on the sameness (ٳⲹ) of the ordinary soul and the enlightened one. The theory underlying this practice is that, due to the impurity caused by attachment of karmic particles to the pure soul, its real nature has become obscured under the worldly conditions generated by karma. The pure soul, in this case, can be recognised by meditation on its true nature, represented by the liberated souls of the siddhas. The practice which leads to this realisation is meditation on the fact that attachment, aversion, passions and the influx of karmas, are ‘not mine�, that I am separate from them and consist of infinite knowledge, perception, conduct, spiritual energy, that I am the pure, enlightened, and everlasting soul.
The qualities of the soul to be meditated on as truly mine are:
My soul is; 1. immutable (a-jara), 2. beginning-less (-徱), 3. infinite (an-anta), 4. imperishable (a-khaya), 5. immovable (a-cala), 6. entire (a-kala), 7. sinless (amala), 8. inaccessible (a-gama), 9. nameless (-Բī), 10. formless (a-ūī), 11. karma-less (a-karma), 12. bondage-free (-ṅd첹), 13. in an unrising state of karma (an-udaya), 14. karmas that cannot be brought forward (-ܻī첹), 15. free from three-fold activities of mind, body and speech (a-Dzī), 16. free from sensual enjoyment (a-Dzī), 17. disease-less (a-Dzī), 18. un-pierceable (-ī), 19. devoid of sexual feelings (-ī), 20. un-breakable (-ī), 21. devoid of sorrow (-ī), 22. passionless (-첹ṣī) 23. beyond colouring (-ī), 24. bodiless (-śīī), 25. devoid of speech (-ṣ�), 26. the state of not consuming (-ī), 27. free from obstruction (-), 28. always stable (agurulaghu), 29. beyond the senses (-ṅdī), 30. devoid of vital force (-ṇ�)[3], 31. free from birth (-Dzī), 32. liberated soul (-ṃsī), 33. immortal (a-mara), 34. alone (a-para), 35. succession-less (-貹ṃp), 36. non-pervasive (ī), 37. independent (-śٲ), 38. un-shakeable (-첹ṃp) 39. free (aviruddha), 40. devoid of karmic influx (-ś), 41. invisible (a-lakha), 42. sorrowless (-śǰ첹), 43. being in detachment (a-ṅgī), 44. shapeless (-첹), 45. knower of cosmic and super cosmic space (ǰǰ첹ñⲹ첹), 46. pure (sudha).[4] [5]
The source of this negation form of description can be found in the texts like Āṅg (Āṅg-ūٰ, 5.6.123-140)[6], Ṣaṭkṇḍ岵a (Ṣaṭkṇḍ岵a, 13.5.4.31)[7], Samayasāra (Samayasāra, 1.49)[8]. The meditation on such extended fourty-five qualities of the pure soul presents the Ծśⲹ naya, which is aligned with Kundakunda’s approach. Kundakunda says, ‘He who perceives the soul as not bound, not touched, not other than itself; steady without any difference and not-combined, know him as the niścaya naya or pure point of view� (Samayasāra, 1.14).[9]
The practitioner should not therefore attach himself to sensory objects which are of the nature of karmic particles (matter); for pure, intelligent and blissful nature is completely different from them. In this way, one must think of the difference between the nature of the soul and matter in meditation by considering that one’s soul is like that of a siddha, but is suffering because of karmas. The eight qualities of the soul are obscured by the eight karmas, the source of pain and pleasure for all worldly beings. Therefore one should neither become attached to such pleasures nor be tormented by such pains. Jayācārya’s process of meditation is analytical (vicaya), and a meditator discriminates himself from the physical, karmic existence. It is a process to connect with the pure self.
The assimilation of the true qualities of the soul, as what one really is, is meant here to displace the obscured understanding of the soul of the practitioner. Repetition of the true qualities of the soul is meant to achieve both insight and understanding of one’s real nature by ostensibly cutting-through and displacing erroneous notions of the soul, i.e., of oneself that have been cultivated in this life on the basis of one’s basic karmic predilections. Practice, mental, verbal and bodily, is a means of practical understanding of oneself, which when performed incessantly and intensely can mentally and finally ‘cutthrough� and achieve the separation (bheda) of soul and body.
As the terminology designating the liberated soul used by Jayācārya is found in Jaina texts like the Āṅg and the Ṣaṭkṇḍ岵a, this indicates that he did not ‘invent� the content, nor the methods of meditation, but, at best, elaborated the received paradigms. His innovativeness of, recontextualising the “textual content� for a meditational purpose, thus rendered a “new structured content� for traditional analytical meditations (ⲹ-Բ) that had only survived through their names, is his contribution.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
[2]:
Jayācārya, (n.d./1997a: 82, Prayoga-3) te sidha bagavāna janama, Ჹ, ṇa, soga, roga, ḥk, dālidra, karma, bharma rahita chai, āṭha ṇ� sahita chai | te Բṅt ātmika ܰ� � lahalīna chai | kalakalībhūta ṃs mahākalesa no 岵, te thakī chūṭ� chai | te siddha bhagavāna no dhyāna ekāgra cita mana thira rākhanai karaṇo |
[4]:
Jayācārya, (n.d./1997a: 82, Prayoga-3) 1. ajara 2. 徱 3. Բṅt 4. akhaya 5. acala 6. akala 7. amala 8.agama 9. Բī 10. aūī 11. akarma 12. abaṅdhaka 13. anudaya 14. Գܻī첹 15. aDzī 16. aDzī 17. aDzī 18. ī 19. ī 20. ī 21. ī 22. 첹ṣī 23. ī 24. īī 25. ī 26. ī 27. 28. agurulaghu 29. Աṅdī 30. aṇ� 31. Dzī 32. ṃsī 33. amara 34. apara 35. aparampara 36. ī 37. śٲ 38. akampa 39. avirudha 40. ś 41. alakha 42. asoka 43. aṅgī
[6]:
[7]:
Ṣaṭkṇḍ岵a, 5.4.31 akasāyamavedatta� akārayatta� videhadā ceva, acalattamalepatta� ca hoṅti accaṃtiyāi� se.