365bet娱乐

There are four references to Kohala in P膩r艣vadeva鈥檚 Sa峁単墨tasamayas膩ra (13th century C.E.). The first reference is in the 艣濒辞办补 venerating many 辫奴谤惫腻肠补谤测补蝉. The other three references occur in the portion about svara where P膩r艣vadeva quotes Kohala on the definition of svara and the nature of svara. The very same 艣濒辞办补s appear in 惭补迟补峁単补鈥檚 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣颈. It is interesting to note that P膩r艣vadeva does  not quote Kohala on the subject of the number of 艣谤耻迟颈蝉 or 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍补 (which have been cited in 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨). On comparison of the references to Kohala in this work and those in 础产丑颈苍补惫补产丑腻谤补迟墨, there are no matching entries found. It is strange that P膩r艣vadeva followed what was written in 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 which was nearly five centuries prior to his time rather that what was said by Abhinavagupta, who was just two centuries his predecessor. This is also a reflection on which authors had access to 础产丑颈苍补惫补产丑腻谤补迟墨. 狈腻苍测补诲别惫补, 艢膩rad膩tanaya, 闯腻测补, 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 and Kumbha seem to be only ones. It could mean that P膩r艣vadeva had access to that work of Kohala which was used by 惭补迟补峁単补, or that he merely used 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 as source material from which he obtained references of Kohala. In either case it would appear that the sources for the views of Kohala that Abhinavagupta and P膩r艣vadeva had were not the same.

厂补峁僩墨迟补-samayas膩ra has yet another connection with Kohala. There is an unpublished work called Kohalamatam, attributed to Kohala which has a lot of material that can be found verbatim in Sa峁単墨tasamayas膩ra. The subjects include the anatomical origin of svaras, reason for naming svaras, 谤腻驳补, prabandha, laya, list of 迟腻濒补蝉 and their 濒补办峁�a峁嘺, 办腻濒补, 补峁単补, 辫谤补蝉迟腻谤补, 惫补颈峁噄办补 濒补办峁�a峁嘺m, 苍腻峁瓂补, nartaka 濒补办峁�a峁嘺m, 蝉补产丑腻辫补迟颈, and 蝉补产丑腻 濒补办峁�a峁嘺m (ref. para 4.1.5). Though there is much material in common, the order of presentation of topics in each of these works is quite different. It is also quite clear (as will be discussed in detail in chap 4) that Kohalamatam is a much later work and could not possibly have been written in the time of Bharata. This appears to be a post-14th century C.E. work which was perhaps written by an author who was also incidentally called Kohala or the work of some other author who tried to gain some attention for his work by attributing it to a famous authority such as Kohala.