Preksha meditation: History and Methods
by Samani Pratibha Pragya | 2016 | 111,074 words
This page relates ‘Launch of Preksha-Dhyana� of study dealing with Preksha-Dhyana: a meditation technique created by Acharya Shri Mahapragya (Acarya Mahaprajna) in the late twentieth century. It synthesizes ancient Jain ascetic methods, ritualistic practices, and modern scientific insights, appealing to a global audience. The thesis explores its historical context, theoretical foundations, and the rise of contemporary Jain meditation systems.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
9. Launch of ʰṣ�-Dhyāna
In 1975, ṣ�-Բ was then launched officially in Jaipur, after a long period of textual research and Mahāprajñā’s personal and ṅg level experiments and experiences. The term ṣ� was first used in the Āṅg-ūٰ, Sūtrakṛtāṅga-ūٰ and ٲś첹-ūٰ-ū.[1] Mahāprajña attempted to revive and restore this ancient practice of Jaina meditation in the 20th century. Mahāprajña (2010a: 172) stated that ṣ� and 貹 were both used as terms for meditative practice in Jaina canonical literature. However, since the term 貹 was already used in Buddhist meditative practice, the term ṣ� was adopted to denote a specifically modern form of Jaina meditation.
The term ṣ� literally means “perception�. However, Mahāprajña (1980a: 1) used it to refer to an intimate awareness of the physical, mental and “spiritual� phenomena associated with the individual embodied soul. ʰṣ� thus became the ability to “see�, “perceive� or become aware of consciousness as the innate quality of the soul at all levels of the soul-body duality. It means “to perceive carefully and profoundly� as attention to “the internal and innate phenomena of consciousness�, and “not an external vision� (Mahāprajña, 2003a: 3).
Whilst ordinarily conventional virtuous meditation (dharma-Բ) in Jainism is defined, as having an analytical view of reality (vicaya-Բ), involving contemplation and concentration of thought on a particular subject for a certain length of time (ղٳٱٳ-ūٰ1, 9.37), in the context of ṣ�-Բ, it refers to concentration or attentive perceptual awareness. It is thus different from any thinking and conceiving processes. The mind (manas) is an instrument of attention and is used here primarily as a medium for meditative focus. Unlike thinking, where the mind “runs after� or moves restlessly across a variety of objects, meditative uses of the mind restrict it so that it is “strictly concerned with the phenomena of the present� (Mahāprajña, 1999a: 1�2).
This awareness of “present� is elaborated further:
It (perception) means blocking out the past, closing the future and focussing on the present moment. When past and future do not obscure the present, you begin to perceive. You have entered the state of meditation. (Mahāprajña, 2003a: 232).
ʰṣ� considers such attentive engagement of the mind as essential. Mahāprajña claims that the mind cannot be engaged in thinking and perceiving at the same time (Mahāprajña, 2011a: 18). As soon as the perceptual focus and awareness begins, conceptual activity recedes as the mind steadies itself in perceiving or having perceptual awareness. Perceiving refers strictly to phenomenon in the present, and subjugating memories of past and imaginations of the future. It is indeed perceptual events and occurrences of the present moment, the here and now, which are the “reality� of conscious awareness or conscious perception that must be attended to. Various methods and approaches used in ṣ�-Բ, thus rely on a notion of perceiving as attentive awareness of phenomena in the present moment, or a continuous awareness of the present contents of one’s perceptual awareness.
Perception plays a strategic role in this practice and it is intriguing to consider why it remains the underlying basis of all practices of ṣ�-Բ. Attentive focus on the present awareness is thought to cultivate experiential awareness, which is devoid of the dualities of like and dislike, pleasure and pain, etc. Such perception is thought to give rise to impartial and equanimous experience, a “neutrality� of perception or perceiving insofar as this is devoid of the emotions of attachment and aversion, pleasure and displeasure. These emotional states should be closely and carefully observed but not be experienced (岹). The idea is to merely observe and “perceive� attachment and aversion but not to associate or identify oneself with them. It is by such introspective observation of the emotions that it becomes possible to reject them and assume a “neutral� or dispassionate view (Mahāprajña, 1999b: 3).
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
Āṅg-ūٰ, 3.83. je kohadaṃsī se māṇadaṃsī, je māṇadaṃsī se māyadaṃsī, je māyadaṃsī se lobhadaṃsī, je lobhadaṃsī se pejjadaṃsī. je pejjadaṃsī, se dosadṃsī, je dosadaṃsī, se mohadaṃsī. je mohadaṃsī se gabbhadaṃsī, je gabbhadaṃsī se jammadaṃsī. je jammadaṃsī se māradaṃsī, je māradaṃsī se nirayadaṃsī. je nirayadaṃsī se tiriyadaṃsī, je tiriyadaṃsī se dukkhadaṃsī., SuS, 1.12.18. and ٲś첹-ūٰ- ܱ, 2.1. saṃpikhae appagamappeṇa�.