Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita (comparative study)
by Ranjni M. | 2013 | 54,094 words
This page relates ‘Brahman: The Ultimate Reality in Advaita� of study dealing with Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita. This thesis presents a comparative analysis of two non-dualistic philosophies, Pratyabhijna from Kashmir and Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta from Kerala, highlighting their socio-cultural backgrounds and philosophical similarities..
Go directly to: Footnotes.
1.2. Brahman: The Ultimate Reality in Advaita
The ultimate reality in Advaita ձԳٲ is Brahman otherwise called as ʲٳ or Parabrahman. There are a lot of 貹Ծṣaic Mantras which uphold the nature of Brahman. 貹Ծṣa describes that before the origin of the universe this Brahman was here.[1] This eternal Brahman only is in front and is in behind; on the right and on the left, below and above. This world is the highest Brahman only.[2] Ten major 貹Ծṣas are commented by Śṅk with a view to establish the concept of ultimate and real nature of Brahman, which is the substratum of the Universe.
Brahman is considered as omnipresent. It is in everywhere in ether, air and in every sentient body. It is bodyless, soreless, sinewless, pure and untainted by sin.[3] It is un-uttered by speech, unthinkable with the mind, invisible with plain eyes, non-smellable and non-hearable with ear. In short it is beyond all sensory organs.[4] In order to highlight the uniqueness and greatness of Brahman Advaita ձԳٲ put forward several adjectives collected from the 貹Ծṣas.
They are:
akṣaram, śreṣṭham, param, ālambanam, vibhu, aśabdam, asparśam, arūpam, avyayam, 徱, dhruvam |[5]
adṛśyam, avyavahāryam, agrāhyam, alakṣaṇam, acintyam, avyapadeśyam, ekātmapratyayasāra� śԳٲ� śivam, advaitam |[6]
In the midst of worldly experiences one cannot distinguish the unnamable, formless, and indescribable character of Brahman. It might be known only through firm intuition or soul experience. This can be attained through the negation of the worldly pleasures. The characteristics of Brahman are unchangeable and it exists as an everlasting principle. The three divisions of time as past present and future do not enter into its nature.[8] It is devoid of all adjuncts and verities.[9] The very nature of Brahman is the pure existence, consciousness and bliss.[10]
In Advaita ձԳٲ Brahman has really neither a characteristic nor any definition. But to communicate ideas about Brahman, it depend the Śܳپ as valuable means of knowledge. 貹Ծṣas proclaim that the creation, preservation and destruction of the universe are imposed on the Brahman.[11] This concept is logically established by Śṅk in his ṣy on ūٰ.[12]
Footnotes and references:
[2]:
[3]:
sa yathokta ٳ paryagātpari samantādagādgatavānākāśavadvyāpītyartha� | śܰ� śܻ� jyotiṣmaddīptimānityartha� | akāyamaśarīro liṅgaśarīravarjita ityartha� | avraṇam akṣatam | asnāvira� snāvā� ś yasminna vidyanta ityasnāviram | avraṇamasnāviramityabhyā� sthūlaśarīraپṣe� | śܻ� nirmalamavidyāmalarahitamiti ṇaśī- پṣe� | apāpaviddha� dharmādharmādi pāpavarjitam | IUSB, 8.
[7]:
ղٳپīDZ貹Ծṣa, 2.1.
[8]:
bhūtācca atikrāntāt kālāt bhavyācca bhaviṣyataśca tathā vartamānāt | kālatrayeṇa yanna paricchidyate | ṻDZ貹Ծṣa-śṅk-ṣy, 2.14.
[11]: