365bet

Kohala in the Sanskrit textual tradition (Study)

by Padma Sugavanam | 2011 | 95,782 words

This page relates ‘Citations of Kohala in the Tikasarvasva� of the thesis dealing with Kohala’s contribution to the Sanskrit textual tradition of ancient Indian performing arts. The study focuses specifically on music (Gita), dance (Nritya), and drama (Natya). Although Kohala’s original works have not been found, numerous references to him across Lakshana-Granthas (treatises) and works by modern scholars indicate his significance.

Part 7 - Citations of Kohala in the Ṭīkāsarvasva

The Ṭīkāsarvasva (1159 C.E.) work is the commentary of Vandyaghaṭīya ԲԻ岹 on 峾ṅgԳśԲ (popularly known as ś) of Amarasimha. Sarvānada cites Kohala in reference to the definitions of 첹ٳ and (ref.para 2.3.8) These terms are aspects of gadya 屹ⲹ or prose literature.Gadya 屹ⲹ are not part of the art of dramatic presentation. It is common for authors belonging to a certain tradition to follow certain conventions regarding topics dealt with etc. And treatises that belong to the ṭy tradition (and for that matter even the śī tradition) do not speak of gadya 屹ⲹ. Kohala was an authority of this ṭy tradition. It does appear unlikely that the Kohala who is believed to have written in ܱ貹ū貹첹-s, , īٲ etc. would have included delineations regarding 첹ٳ and . In that case which Kohala is ԲԻ岹 referring to? Perhaps, in his (ԲԻ岹’s) times, there was another author called Kohala who had written a work on 󾱳ٲⲹ from which he quotes this verse.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: