365bet娱乐

叠丑补谤补迟补产丑腻峁�y补m (1097-1154 C.E.) or 厂补谤补蝉惫补迟墨-丑峁沝补测腻濒补峁卥腻谤补丑腻谤补 of 狈腻苍测补诲别惫补, does not contain any references to Kohala per se. But a study of Kohala through the eyes of Abhinavagupata indicates the relevance of this work. While commenting on the 骋补迟测补诲丑测腻测补 (Chapter 12) of the 狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补, Abhinavagupta, on many occasions refers to 迟腻濒补蝉 (such as 蝉耻产丑补诲谤腻, 诲丑腻谤腻, 办丑补帽箩补办补 et.) that were spoken of by Kohala. The names or defintions of these 迟腻濒补蝉 are not seen in works like Dattilam or 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 and for that matter even Abhinavagupta does not explain these 迟腻濒补蝉. The editor of the GOS edition of 狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补 and 础产丑颈苍补惫补产丑腻谤补迟墨, M. R. Kavi gives definitions in the form of citations from Kohala and Tumburu for many of these 迟腻濒补蝉 (ref.para 2.1.14). Unfortunately, he does not mention his source for this information. However, on a study of the manuscript of 叠丑补谤补迟补产丑腻峁�y补^[1] many of these were found in the section dealing with 产丑补峁単补 迟腻濒补蝉. Dhruv膩 g膩na included some 迟腻濒补蝉 which were classified as 产丑补峁単补, vi产丑补峁単补 and upa产丑补峁単补 迟腻濒补蝉. In the commentary of the thirty second chapter of 狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补, Abhinava suggests that these 迟腻濒补蝉 were created out of the process of 产丑补峁単补 (breaking up, 迟腻濒补蝉 like 肠补肠肠补迟辫耻峁璦) which was also clearly delineated by Kohala. From Abhinava鈥檚 words, it appears that the process of arriving at these 产丑补峁単补 迟腻濒补蝉 as well as the individual descriptions of each of these was explained by Kohala in his work. The 产丑补峁単补 迟腻濒补蝉 have not been spoken of by Bharata, nor do they find a place in any of the 诲别艣墨 works like 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨, 厂补峁単墨迟补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补 etc. It is Bharata-产丑腻峁�y补 which offers us information regarding these 产丑补峁単补 迟腻濒补蝉 (which could even be a reproduction of what was found in Kohala鈥檚 work) and hence is significant from the perspective of understanding Kohala.