365bet娱乐

The definitions and characteristics of figures have varied in course of time in Sanskrit Poetics. But the basic characteristics of the majority of figures have more or less remained unchanged. Yamaka and 补苍耻辫谤腻蝉补 can be regarded as the core figures of word whereas 耻辫补尘腻 holds the crown of supremacy among 补谤迟丑腻濒补峁僰腻谤补蝉. 笔耻苍补谤耻办迟补惫补诲腻产丑腻蝉补 seems to be the only prominent member of the 尘颈艣谤腻濒补峁僰腻谤补 section.

A detailed and comparative discussion on definitions and characteristics of the figures mentioned by 痴腻尘补苍补 has been carried out in the previous two chapters of this work. 痴腻尘补苍补 treats yamaka and 补苍耻辫谤腻蝉补鈥攖he two most prominent figures of words. He furnishes a detailed discourse on the mother figure 耻辫补尘腻. He follows the common or traditional notion on the characteristics of some figures like ananvaya, 苍颈诲补谤艣补苍腻, sahokti, 辫补谤颈惫峁泃迟颈, 耻辫补尘别测辞辫补尘腻 etc. The treatment of some of the figures like 补谤迟丑腻苍迟补谤补苍测腻蝉补, 补辫谤补蝉迟耻迟补辫谤补艣补峁僺腻, 蝉补尘腻蝉辞办迟颈, prativastu, sasandeha, 惫测腻箩辞办迟颈 etc. by him seems to indicate the primary developing stage of the individual figures. Again, the treatment of some individual figures like 腻办峁�e辫补, vakrokti, karma, 迟耻濒测补测辞驳颈迟腻, 惫颈艣别峁�o办迟颈 etc. by him is distinctive in the history of Sanskrit Poetics. It is probably his rigidness to stick to the principle of similarity in defining individual figures which has made his doctrine different from others.

It is also worth mentioning that the particular definitions of most of the individual figures put forth by 痴腻尘补苍补 are very much unique from his predecessors as well as his followers. This could be because of the fact that 痴腻尘补苍补 has formulated his work on the 鈥�蝉奴迟谤补-惫峁泃迟颈鈥� format of the Grammarians. The chief characteristic feature of a 蝉奴迟谤补 is its terseness and compactness. So, 痴腻尘补苍补鈥檚 definitions of individual figures which are in the form of 蝉奴迟谤补s are also very terse and compact in nature.