Vakyapadiya of Bhartrihari
by K. A. Subramania Iyer | 1965 | 391,768 words
The English translation of the Vakyapadiya by Bhartrihari including commentary extracts and notes. The Vakyapadiya is an ancient Sanskrit text dealing with the philosophy of language. Bhartrhari authored this book in three parts and propounds his theory of Sphotavada (sphota-vada) which understands language as consisting of bursts of sounds conveyi...
This book contains Sanskrit text which you should never take for granted as transcription mistakes are always possible. Always confer with the final source and/or manuscript.
Verse 3.7.25
Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation of verse 3.7.25:
द्रव्यादिविषयो हेतु� कारक� नियतक्रियम� �
कर्त� कर्त्रन्तरापेक्ष� क्रियाया� हेतुरिष्यत� � २५ �dravyādiviṣayo hetu� 첹� niyatakriyam |
kartā kartrantarāpekṣa� yā� heturiṣyate || 25 ||25. The cause (hetu) has substance etc. as its scope whereas an accessory (첹) is restricted to action. When an agent depends upon another for the accomplishment of the action, it is also called cause (hetu).
Commentary
The author now points out the difference in the scope of �hetu� and �Բ� though they both produce effects.
[Read verse 25 above]
[The difference between �hetu� and 첹 is this. That which can bring about a substance (dravya), quality (ṇa.) or action () is hetu, as in the following sentences: īṅkܰ� = ‘tdzܲ the seed, the sprout,� dhanena kulam = ‘tdzܲ wealth, the family, vidyayā yaśa� = ‘tdzܲ learning, fame, śilpābhyāsena naipuṇyam = ‘tdzܲ practice of a craft, skill,� agninā 첹� = through fire, cooking. That which helps in the accomplishment of the action but is not presented as performing any operation is called �hetu�. That is why fire is the �hetu� of cooking (첹) and takes the third case-ending. The same is true of the other sentences. An accessory (첹) can bring about action only. Each one performs some operation or other. There is only one thing which performs some operation and is yet called �hetu�: that which prompts another to do something (P. 1.4.55).]
The difference between �hetu� and 첹ṇa� is now stated.