Traces of Mysticism in Jainism (Study)
by Sadhvi Madhystha Prabha | 2021 | 103,765 words
This page relates ‘Concept of God in Upanishads� of the study on the concept of Mysticism in Jainism exploring key concepts such as Jaina metaphysics and Jain ethics. The present research is divided into six chapters, beginning with an introduction to mysticism, examining its characteristics from both Western and Eastern perspectives. Subsequent chapters delve into the mystical aspects of Brahmanic and Shramanic literature, analyzing texts from the Shvetambara and Digambara traditions to unearth traces of Jain mysticism.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
4.2. Concept of God in 貹Ծṣa
[Full title: Concept of God: A Mystical Reality (2) God in 貹Ծṣa]
The 貹Ծṣa are monotheistic in nature. The Ultimate Reality that mystic seer experiences is named as �Brahman�.
It is proclaimed that�
“T Brahman is the Rahasya (mystical).�
Anything or any uttering about him is mysticism.
While describing the �Brahman�, the unitive state with Brahman or identification of Brahman and atman or self-realization, the mystic feels himself as un-expressible, but still, they express partly the ultimate reality in negative as well as in positive ways:
1. Positive and Negative Expression
Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa �
�tasya 峦ī dik ̄cah sa esa neti netyatma; agrhyo na hi gṛhyate, aśīryo nahi siryate, asango na hi sajyāte, asito na vyathatena riṣyati; ⲹṃv janaka�
This self is that which has been described as ‘not this, not this�. It is imperceptible, for it is never perceived; undecaying, for it never decays; unattached, for it is never attached; unfettered. It never feels pain, and never suffers injury[2]�
Kena 貹Ծṣa enigmatically describes Brahman �
�anyadevatadviditādatho aviditādadhi��
It is not uttered by speech, that by which speech is revealed; that which man does not comprehend with the mind, that by which mind is encompassed; that which cannot be seen through eyes but where power helps the eye to see, that is Brahman[3].
The ṻ 貹Ծṣa describes the Self �
�Asadamasparśamarupamavyaya�, tatha rasam�..tanmṛtyumukhāt pramucyate.�
It is “Soundless, touch less, colorless, undiminishing and also tasteless, eternal, odourless, without beginning and end, distinct from mahat and ever constant[4].�
He is eternal among non-eternals, the principle of intelligence among the intelligent, the one who alone dispenses the desired objects to many, for such alone is eternal peace and for non-else.[5]
Emphasizing the omnipresence quality of Brahman, the ѳṇḍ첹 貹Ծṣa explains it with the metaphor as the whole cosmos is assumed as the body of Brahman and its part as various limbs. It states -�Heaven as his head, the moon and the sun as his two eyes, the directions as two ears, revealed Vedas as His speech, air and heart and it is the form whose two feet emerged the earth.�[6] While explaining the glory of Brahman, ѳṇḍ첹 貹Ծṣa describes, “t divine truth is vast and beyond all imagination; that is, it is smaller than the smallest, the greater than the greatest. It is farthest as well as very near in the heart�[7].
2. Paradoxical Nature
When Yajnavalkya was challenged by Gargi in the assembly of Janaka, he expounded Brahman in paradoxical manner.
This immutable Brahman is that so�
�havāca etadvai tadakṣaram gārg na tadaśnati kaṣcave�
“It is neither gross nor fine, neither short nor long, neither redness nor oiliness, neither shadow nor darkness, neither air nor ether unattached, neither savour nor odour, without eyes or ears, without it does not eat anything, nor does anybody eat it[8] �.
The Īśa 貹Ծṣa describes the paradoxical nature as Brahman �
“T moves, that does not move; that is far off, that is very near; that is inside all and that is outside all[9] �.
3. Abode of Brahman
When it is questioned that where does Brahman reside? To this the Keno 貹Ծṣa ٲٱ:�
�ٲⲹⲹٲԲ�
“Truth is his abode[10]�.
Mundaka 貹Ծṣa ٲٱ�
“He is seated in the cavity of heart[11]�.
Whereas, the Mandukya 貹Ծṣa ԳپDzԲ�
“t Supreme Reality is hidden into the Supreme word �AUM�.[12]
4. Form and Nature of Brahman
While explaining the form and nature of Brahman, the mystic says�
�Brahman is a pure intelligence[13]; he is truth, knowledge and infinite[14] �.
�Hiranyamaye pare kośe virajam braham�.yadatma vido viduh[15] Ũ�
“T innermost sheath of the golden hue, dwells Brahman, the stainless and indivisible. He is purity he is light of lights.�
5. Non-Comprehensible and Inexpressible
The mystic seer in expressing the Brahman states that the reality (that is united in this state is) cannot be comprehended with the senses, mind and intellect as it is said in Taittirya 貹Ծṣa�
�yato vācānivartante. Aprāpya manasa saha�
�Brahman is not the subject of speech or mind. In fact, speech or mind turns back from it[16]�.
Kena 貹Ծṣa Բ�
�anyad eva tadviditādatho avidhitādadhi....�
“T Brahman is surely different from the known and again it is above the known[17]�.
Moreover,
�na tatra cakṣurgacchati na vāggacchatti na manah na vidmo na vijānīmo �
“T eyes does not go there, nor speech, nor mind. We do not know Brahman to be such an; hence we are not aware of any process of instructing about it[18]�.
Accordingly states ṻ 貹Ծṣa[19] -Āٳ/Brahman is superior over intellect, mind, object and senses[20].
6 Āٳ and Brahman
The illumined seers who have reached the final stage of realisation, declares that the self and the God are one.[21]
Describing the marked difference of nature between self and Brahman, The Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa ٲٱ�
“As a lump of salt is without interior or exterior, entire, and purely saline in taste, even so is the Self (Brahman) without interior or exterior, entire and pure consciousness/ Intelligence alone. The self (individual being) comes out as a separate entity from these elements; this separateness is destroyed with them. After attaining this oneness, it has no more particular consciousness.�
“T Brahman that is immediate and direct and the self that is within all.�[22]
The enlightened says this (self) indeed is that Brahman[23]. This immutable Brahman is never seen but is the witness, is never heard but is the hearer, it is never thought but is the thinker, it is never known but is the knower.[24]
The ṻ 貹Ծṣa explains it with the analogy of two birds ٳ�
“Tre are two birds, where one enjoys sweet and bitter fruits of trees and other just sees[25]�
I.e. the observer or witness is Brahman.
In the enlightenment experience the illusion of separateness ceases. The mystic realises that which identity has always been the truth.
Therefore, the mystic expresses his unity of the self with the Supreme principle, Brahman as:
�idam sarvarh brahma�[26]—“All this is Brahman, Aham Brahmāsmi[27]ŨĔI am Brahman,
�Tatt tvamasi{GL_NOTE:258961:ŨĔyou are that,
�Ayamātmā Brahman[29]ŨĔThis atman is Brahman,
�Prajnanam Brahma[30]Ũ�Brahman as consciousness or knowledge.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
ṻ 貹Ծṣa, 1.3.17.
[2]:
The Message of Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 4.2.4; 2.3.6; 3.9.26.
[3]:
[4]:
ṻ 貹Ծṣa, 1.3.15.
[5]:
Ibid 2.2.13
[6]:
ѳṇḍ첹 and Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa, Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa, 2.1.4.
[7]:
Ibid 3.1.7, ṻ 貹Ծṣa 1.2.20.
[8]:
The Message of Bṛhadāṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 3.8.8 p. 457.
[9]:
Īśa 貹Ծṣa, verse 5
[10]:
Kena 貹Ծṣa, 4.8
[11]:
ѳṇḍ첹 and Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa, ѳṇḍ첹 貹Ծṣa, 2.1.10.
[12]:
Ibid, Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa, verse.8
[13]:
The Message of Bṛhadāṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 2.4.12.
[14]:
Taittariya 貹Ծṣa, 2.1.1.
[15]:
ѳṇḍ첹 and Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa, Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa, 2.2.9.
[16]:
Taittariya 貹Ծṣa, 2.4.1.
[17]:
Kena 貹Ծṣa, 1.4.
[18]:
Kena 貹Ծṣa, 1.3.
[19]:
ṻ 貹Ծṣa, 2.3.2.
[20]:
The Message of Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 4.1.3.20.
[21]:
History of Mysticism, p. 39; The message Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 2.5.1.
[22]:
Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 3.4.1.
[23]:
ṻ 貹Ծṣa, 2.2.8.
[24]:
Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 3.8.11.
[25]:
ṻ 貹Ծṣa, 2.1.1.
[26]:
The Message of Bṛhadāraṇyaka 貹Ծṣa, 4.5.7.
[27]:
Ibid, 1.4.10.
[28]:
Chāndogya 貹Ծṣa, 6.8.7.
[29]:
ѳṇḍ첹 and Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa, Māṇḍukya 貹Ծṣa verse 2.
[30]:
Aitreya 貹Ծṣa, I.2.