Markandeya Purana (Study)
by Chandamita Bhattacharya | 2021 | 67,501 words
This page relates ‘philosophy of Yoga (Introduction)� of the study on the Markandeya Purana, one of the oldest of the eigtheen Mahapuranas preserving the history, civilisation, culture and traditions of ancient India. The Markandeyapurana commences with the questions raised by Rishi Jaimini (a pupil of Vyasa), who approaches the sage Markandeya with doubts related to the Mahabharata. This study examines various social topics such as the status of women, modes of worship, yoga, etc.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
The philosophy of Yoga (Introduction)
Yoga and ṃkⲹ may be considered to belong to the same family. ṃkⲹ refers to the theoretical concept whereas Yoga may be treated as its practical counterpart. The word Yoga comes from the English word ‘yoke� meaning to join.[1] Yoga joins the divinity within us with the pervasive divinity around us.[2] Basically, Yoga is the joining of the ٳ and brahman. The word Yoga is found to have several meanings used in several senses. In the ṻ岹, Yoga literally means “yoking� or “connecting� which practically means to yoke the mind in order to increase the concentration power of the mind to achieve the unachieved.[3] The word ‘yoking� was found in the later Vedic period also.[4]
Śī岵ī explains both ṃkⲹ and Yoga together:
The word Yoga is derived from the root yuj with the suffix ñ which have two meanings, union (yujir Yoge) and concentration (yuj samādhan) i.e. the union of the individual soul and the supreme soul.[6] Śī岵ī explains the word in both senses.[7] However, both these meanings equally hold well in the ī. But, according to ʲٲñᲹ, Yoga does not mean union. He puts forward another significant meaning of Yoga which is complete suppression of mental modes. According to ʲٲñᲹ and Kapila, Yoga means to achieve stability in the mental state in order to have commendable control over the mind which, in turn, enables one to discriminate between ʳܰṣa or the soul and the Prakriti.[8] Thus the term Yoga designated as viyoga i.e. separation between ʰṛt and ʳܰṣa.[9]
The Yoga Philosophy
According to 貹Ծṣa, controlling the senses is known as Yoga.[10] The ṣa gives the definition of Yoga.[11] The ñⲹ states that the combination of the individual soul and the supreme soul is yoga.[12] The ʳܰṇa explain the definition of Yoga in various ways.
According to the վṣṇܱܰṇa,
ātmaprayagtnasāpekṣ� viśiṣṭā yā manogati� /
ٲ ṇi saṃyogo yoga ithyabhidhīyate /[13]
Here Yoga means the intellectual activity specified by one’s own efforts by which one becomes united with Brahman.
According to 첹Ի岹ܰṇa,
cittavṛttinirodhākhya� yogatattva� prakīrtitam //[14]
I.e. the element of Yoga signifies to contain the control of the instability of the mind. The Բܰṇa also states that acquiring the knowledge of everything in this world is called Yoga.[15] According to the Ҳḍaܰṇa, the unity among the Brahman and ٳ is called Yoga.[16] The Ծܰṇa states that, Yoga is a kind of mental activity. Yoga depends upon one’s own effort and union with Brahman.[17] It is defined as the connection of accurate coordination between the mind and the senses. The ܰṇa states that only sitting in 貹峾Բ and concentrating on the tip of the nose is not considered to be Yoga.[18]
Ѳṣi ʲٲñᲹ is known as the founder of the Yoga system. Pātanjali’s Yoga system yet this fact cannot be denied that Yoga has been followed by people from the ancient time.
The oldest recorded text book of Yoga is the ۴Dzūٰ of Ѳṣi ʲٲñᲹ. At the very outset of the book, ʲٲñᲹ made the readers very clear that yoga only means complete suppression of the mental modes which requires immense concentration power of the mind i.e., ٳٲṛtپԾǻ�.[19] The ۴Dzūٰ consists of four chapters or 岹, containing different objectives and the explanations. The first chapter, 岹, primarily concentrates on the nature and aim of or meditative absorption in 51 ūٰ. The second chapter called Բ岹, containing 55 ūٰ, elaborates the ways to find the path to the end. The third chapter namely ūپ岹 describes in 55 ūٰ, the different techniques of Yoga practices to achieve supernatural powers. The fourth chapter 첹ⲹ岹, which contains 34 ūٰ, discusses the nature and ways for liberation.[20]
It has been already stated that Yoga and ṃkⲹ are subjects that are correlated and there is only a little difference in the philosophical principles between the two. One striking difference between the two is that Yoga clearly points out the ways following which one can attain the knowledge of distinction between the self and the not self which ṃkⲹ seems to lack. But ultimately both aim at attaining the most important knowledge of life, the discriminative knowledge (viveka-پ). According to Mukta Biswas, “for all practical purposes ṃkⲹ and Yoga may be treated as the theoretical and practical sides of the same system.�[21] The Yoga philosophy admits the existence of God. Even though, it acknowledges the presence of God, It does not deviate from the principles laid down in the ṃkⲹ. Therefore, Yoga philosophy is also regarded as theistic ṃkⲹ in many instances. Both Yoga and ṃkⲹ philosophy favour the dualism of ʳܰṣa and ʰṛt. ʰṛt is unique and is non intelligent whereas ʳܰṣa is many in number and is conscious. The ṃkⲹ acknowledges twenty five principles and so does Yoga. However, there is an additional principle that can be found in Yoga philosophy which is God. But according to Yoga, God is only a special form of ʳܰṣa or the self who is eternally liberated and can see or sense the eternal truth.[22] Perception, inference and testimony are the three ṇa accepted by the Yoga philosophy.
According to Yoga philosophy, the mind (also citta or buddhi) experiences a constant modification throughout the life. These mental modifications take place as a result of gain of knowledge. Yoga philosophy acknowledges pain as a mode of citta. To get rid of this pain, one has to have complete control over his mind so that no modification of citta can take place. All the pains cease as the further modification in the citta ceases.[23] This is why, Ѳṣi ʲٲñᲹ, emphasizes on complete suppression of mental modes in his book ۴Dzūٰ. On the ۴Dzūٰ, ղ wrote a commentary called ղbhāṣya or ۴Dzṣy. After that some scholars Vācaspati Miśra, Vijñānabhikṣu, Bhojorāja etc. have developed this Yoga system.
Yoga in the 첹ṇḍⲹܰṇa
Almost all the ʳܰṇa, specially the Ѳٲܰṇa,[24] the 첹Ի岹ܰṇa,[25] the վṣṇܱܰṇa,[26] the ūܰṇa,[27] the ṅgܰṇa[28], the Ծܰṇa[29] , the Ҳḍaܰṇa[30] , the 岵ٲܰṇa,[31] the ܱܰṇa,[32] the ܰṇa,[33] etc. describe the different aspects of Yoga philosophy. Manvantara, Yoga, method of computation of a Yoga and division of time, Yoga in relation to events and personalities etc have been discussed in the ܱܰṇa.[34] The realization of the ultimate reality through the attainment of Brahmahood as Ѳś has been also discussed in this ʳܰṇa. This is called apavarga.[35] This realisation is achieved through the manas and buddhi. It also discusses the attainment of Brahman. This can be attained through the power of the Yoga.
The Brahma-bhakti, which may be ⾱첹, 峦첹 and Բ첹, Vaidiki and Āٳ쾱 have been delineated in the ʲ峾ܰṇa. This Āٳ쾱 bhakti is further subdivided into the Yoga bhakti and ṃkⲹ bhakti.[36] In the ʲ峾ܰṇa, the practice of ṇa峾 and meditation upon Lord , is called Yoga bhakti.[37]
The Ѳ첹ṇḍⲹܰṇa is one of the oldest and most important of the extant ʳܰṇa. Among the 134 chapters, this ʳܰṇa contains five chapters viz, 36 to 40 chapters dealing with ṛtپ dharma or Yoga. In this ʳܰṇa, Dattatreya said to Alarka how one can get final emancipation through the attain yoga or control of the breath, control of the senses, meditation etc.
Footnotes and references:
[3]:
Rgveda, 1.34.9, 7.6.7.8, 2.27.2, 10.30.11; Surendranath Dasgupta, A History of Indian Philosophy, Vol., p.226
[5]:
Śī岵ī, 4.4
[6]:
ṣṭ⾱, 7.1.71
[7]:
yogaśٳٲṛtپԾǻ�, Śī岵ī,. 6.23
[9]:
cf. S. Radhakrishnan, Indian Philosophy, Vol.II, p. 337
[10]:
tā� yogamiti manyante sthirāmindriyadhāraṇam... Kathopanisada, 2.6.11; Candogyopanisad, 6.8.6
[12]:
saṃyogo yoga ityukto jīvātmaparamٳoriti, ñⲹṣmrti, 1.2
[13]:
վṣṇܱܰṇa, 6.7.31
[14]:
첹Ի岹ܰṇa, 55.11.1
[15]:
sarvārthajñānaniṣpattirāsrayo yogo ucyate / Բܰṇa, 8.3 a
[16]:
brahmٳothadaiktva� sa yogaścottamottama� // Ҳḍaܰṇa, 227.49 b
[18]:
na ca 貹峾Բd yogo na nāsāgranirīkṣaṇāt/
manasaśceindriyāṇāñca saṅyogo yoga ucyate // ܰṇa, 234.28
[19]:
۴Dzūٰ, 1.2
[20]:
J. Sanyal and K.N. Mallick, Indian Philosophy, p. 1
[21]:
Mukta Biswas, ṃkⲹ-yoga Epistemology, p.34
[22]:
Tattvavaiśāradī on ۴Dzūٰ, 1.29
[23]:
J. Sanyal and K.N. Mallick, Indian Philosophy, p. 2
[24]:
Ѳٲܰṇa., 9,12,13,15,21,43,45,70,109,135,154,164,171,180,183,185,282
[26]:
վṣṇܱܰṇa, 2.13.42-44; 5.10.15; 6.6.1-3; 6.7.25,31-41, 47-74,76-77,79-81,83-92
[27]:
ūܰṇa, Pūrvārdha,12,13; ٳٲ,1,7,11,12,45
[28]:
ṅgܰṇa, 1.8.9,88; 2.55
[29]:
Ծܰṇa, 26.1-7; 161.19-25; 165.7-18; 214.1-41; 372.1-36; 373.1-21; 374.1-33;
375.1-22;
376.1-44; 379.24-27; 381.34
[30]:
Ҳḍaܰṇa,pūrvakhaṇḍa, 14.49.218.227.
[31]:
岵ٲܰṇa, 2.2; 3.28; 4.4; 11.14,15,19,28
[32]:
ܱܰṇa, 9-12,16-18,20,23
[33]:
ܰṇa, 127-131
[35]:
Philosophical Speculations of Selected ʳܰṇa, p. 506
[36]:
ʲ峾ܰṇa, 1.15,164-177
[37]:
Ibid., 187-190