365bet娱乐

罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 is a rare work which deals with the subject of 罢腻濒补诲补艣补辫谤腻峁嘺蝉 in such detail. One very important piece of information that can be gleaned from this work is about the many 濒补办峁�a峁嘺驳谤补苍迟丑补蝉 that the author so often refers to. 

Ramakrishna Kavi has made the following observations about this work.

啶曕�冟し啷嵿ぃ啶︵�囙さ啶班ぞ啶�啶膏�嬥う啶班�囙�� 啶呧�氞�嵿く啷佮い啶班ぞ啶�啷囙�� 啶掂た啶班�氞た啶む�� 啷� 啶呧い啷嵿ぐ 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿さ啶距�氞ぞ啶班�嵿く啶�啶むぞ啶ㄠた 啶�啶灌�傕え啶� 啶むぞ啶侧さ啶苦し啶�啷� 啶栢ぃ啷嵿ぁ啶苦い啶距え啶� 啷� 啶むぞ啶侧�曕げ啶距さ啶苦げ啶距��, 啶膏�權�嵿�椸��啶むさ啶苦う啷嵿く啶距さ啶苦え啷嬥う, 啶溹�堗え啶�啶�, 啶膏�權�嵿�椸��啶むぎ啶距ぐ啷嵿��, 啶氞い啷佮ぐ啶膏き啶距さ啶苦げ啶距じ, 啶氞�佮ぁ啶距ぎ啶｀�� (啶膏�權�嵿�椸��啶む�氞�傕ぁ啶距ぎ啶｀た), 啶嗋�炧�嵿�溹え啷囙く啶�啶�, 啶ㄠ�冟い啷嵿い啶氞�佮ぁ啶距ぎ啶｀た, 啶膏�權�嵿�椸��啶むぎ啶｀た啶︵ぐ啷嵿お啶�, 啶曕ぞ啶む�嵿く啶�啶ㄠ��啶�, 啶膏�權�嵿�椸��啶むぞ啶班�嵿ぃ啶�, 啶班�權�嵿�椸ぐ啶距�溹き啶班い啶�啶距し啷嵿��, 啶曕お啶班�嵿う啷�, 啶�啶班ぎ啷囙ざ啷嵿さ啶班ぞ啶︵��啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶�啶むぞ啶ㄠ�� 啶栢ぃ啷嵿ぁ啶苦い啶距え啶� 啷� 啶熰��啶曕ぞ啶�啷佮�曕�嵿い啷嬥そ啶�啶� 啶椸�嵿ぐ啶ㄠ�嵿ぅ啶� 啷� 啶むぞ啶侧お啷嵿ぐ啶膏�嵿い啶距ぐ啶距ぇ啷嵿く啶距く啶距ぐ啶�啷嵿き啷� 啶膏��啶むぞ啶班ぞ啶�啶椸�佮ぐ啷佮�� 啶ㄠい啷嵿さ啶� 啶膏�嬥ぎ啶距き啶熰�嵿�熰�囙え 啶むえ啷嵿く啶む�� 啷� 啶椸�嵿ぐ啶ㄠ�嵿ぅ啷� 啶むぞ啶侧�曕げ啶距さ啶距ぐ啷嵿ぇ啷� 啶囙い啷嵿く啶膏�嵿い啶� 啷� 啶むじ啷嵿ぎ啶距う啶氞�嵿く啷佮い啶班ぞ啶�啶ㄠぞ啶�啷嵿え啶� 啶膏�嬥ぎ啶距き啶熰�嵿�熰�� 啶囙ぎ啶� 啶椸�嵿ぐ啶ㄠ�嵿ぅ啶� (啶むぞ啶侧�曕げ啶距が啷嵿ぇ啶苦��) 啶班�氞た啶むさ啶距え啶苦い啷嵿く啷傕す啷嵿く啶む�� 啷� 啶呧し啷嵿�熰ぞ啶掂ぇ啶距�� 啶膏�嬥ぎ啶ㄠぞ啶班�嵿く啶膏�嵿�� 啶ㄠぞ啶熰�嵿く啶氞�傕ぁ啶距ぎ啶｀た啶曕ぐ啷嵿い啷佮�� 啶椸�佮ぐ啷佮�� 啶膏��啶むぞ啶班ぞ啶�啶� 啷� 啶膏�嬥ぎ啶距き啶熰�嵿�熰�� 啶膏�嬥ぎ啶ㄠぞ啶班�嵿く 啶忇さ啷囙い啶� 啶掂ぞ 啶むい啷嵿じ啶む��啶班�嵿ぅ啷� 啶掂�囙い啶� 啶ㄠた啶多�嵿�氞く啶� 啷�

k峁涐梗峁嘺devar膩yasodare峁嘺 acyutar膩ye峁嘺 惫颈谤补肠颈迟补岣� | atra p奴rv膩c膩ryamat膩ni bah奴ni t膩lavi峁�aye kha峁囜笉it膩ni | 迟腻濒补办补濒腻惫颈濒腻蝉补, 蝉补峁単墨迟补惫颈诲测腻惫颈苍辞诲补, jainamata, 蝉补峁単墨迟补尘腻谤驳补, 肠补迟耻谤补蝉补产丑腻惫颈濒腻蝉补, 肠耻岣嵞乵补峁噄 (蝉补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄), 腻帽箩补苍别测补尘补迟补, n峁泃ta肠耻岣嵞乵补峁噄, 蝉补峁単墨迟补尘补峁噄诲补谤辫补峁嘺, 办腻迟测补测补苍墨测补, 蝉补峁単墨迟腻谤峁嘺惫补, 谤补峁単补谤腻箩补产丑补谤补迟补产丑腻峁�y补, 办补辫补谤诲墨, parame艣var膩d墨n膩峁� mat膩ni kha峁囜笉it膩ni | 峁�墨k膩yukto'ya峁� 驳谤补苍迟丑补岣� | t膩laprast膩r膩dhy膩y膩rambhe 蝉墨迟腻谤腻尘补驳耻谤耻峁� 苍补迟惫腻 som膩bha峁�峁璭na tanyate | granthe t膩lakal膩v膩rdhau ityasti | tasm膩dacyutar膩yan膩mn膩 蝉辞尘腻产丑补峁�峁�补岣� 颈尘补峁� 驳谤补苍迟丑补峁� (迟腻濒补办补濒腻产诲丑颈峁�) racitav膩nity奴hyate | 补峁ａ弓腻惫补诲丑腻苍补 蝉辞尘补苍腻谤测补sya n膩峁瓂ac奴岣嵞乵a峁噄kartu岣� 驳耻谤耻岣� 蝉墨迟腻谤腻尘补岣� | 蝉辞尘腻产丑补峁�峁�补岣� 蝉辞尘补苍腻谤测补 eveti v膩 tatsat墨rtho veti 苍颈艣肠补测补岣� |

He says that this work refutes the views expressed in several earlier 濒补办峁�a峁嘺驳谤补苍迟丑补蝉 such as

1. 罢腻濒补办补濒腻惫颈濒腻蝉补;
2. 厂补峁単墨迟补惫颈诲测腻惫颈苍辞诲补;
3. Jainamata;
4. 厂补峁単墨迟补尘腻谤驳补;
5. 颁补迟耻谤补蝉补产丑腻惫颈濒腻蝉补;
6. 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄;
7. 膧帽箩补苍别测补尘补迟补;
8. 狈峁泃迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄;
9. 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补峁噄诲补谤辫补峁嘺;
10. 碍腻迟测腻测补苍墨测补;
11. 厂补苍驳墨迟腻谤峁嘺惫补;
12. 搁补峁単补谤腻箩补产丑补谤补迟补产丑腻峁�y补;

Many of the works mentioned herein (罢腻濒补办补濒腻惫颈濒腻蝉补m etc.) are yet to see the light of day. 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 is our only source of information regarding many of these 濒补办峁�a峁嘺驳谤补苍迟丑补蝉. It is also quite fortunate for us that the author goes one step further and gives us actual quotations from these works. Thus, even though we do not have direct access to many of these works, we have the very words of those authors through this work鈥�罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘. Such a style, where several works are consulted, opinions discussed and conclusions reached, makes 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 a rare work where the 尘奴濒补 text itself is composed with a research-spirit that one might come across in commentaries. Another fact relates to the date of the work. It is a well-known fact that King 础肠测耻迟补谤腻测补 ruled between 1530 and 1543 C.E. and during this period composed the work 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘.

Some early 濒补办峁�a峁嘺驳谤补苍迟丑补蝉 in which we find the concept of 罢腻濒补诲补艣补辫谤腻峁嘺蝉 being dealt with as a composite unit are:

S.No.	Title of the Text	Author	Date
i.	厂补峁単墨迟补蝉奴谤测辞诲补测补	尝补办峁�m墨苍腻谤腻测补峁嘺	1509-1529 C.E.
ii.	搁补蝉补办补耻尘耻诲墨	艢谤墨办补峁囜弓丑补	1575 C.E.
iii.	厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补	狈腻谤补诲补	16th Cent C.E.
iv.	厂补峁単墨迟补诲补谤辫补峁嘺	Damodara	1625 C.E.
v.	厂补峁単墨迟补辫腻谤颈箩腻迟补	Ahobala	1650 C.E.
vi.	罢腻濒补诲补艣补辫谤腻峁嘺辫谤补诲墨辫颈办腻	笔辞濒奴谤颈 Govinda Kavi	17th Cent C.E.

From this, we can infer that 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 was probably one of the earlier works which spoke about the 罢腻濒补诲补艣补辫谤腻峁嘺蝉. Furthermore, it is significant that this work speaks of no other subject, unlike the other 濒补办峁�a峁嘺驳谤补苍迟丑补蝉 mentioned above. 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘 deals with the 罢腻濒补诲补艣补辫谤腻峁嘺蝉 alone. 

Further, in this work, he quotes several other authors who have composed works which carry information about the ten 辫谤腻峁嘺蝉. Therefore we can safely presume that, if 础肠测耻迟补谤腻测补 had access to all these works at the time of writing 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘, they must all pre-date Acyuta. This shows us that these concepts had reached a good level of refinement well before the time Acyuta wrote 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘. This work is very significant in the study of the evolution and concept of the 罢腻濒补诲补艣补辫谤腻峁嘺蝉 and is worthy for further research.

Connection with Kohala

After a study of the text 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘, it can be stated that 础肠测耻迟补谤腻测补 is the author of this work and not Kohala. The reasons for bringing the name of Kohala in connection with this work can at best be speculated. There is no evidence, except the introductory passage (which in itself might be an interpolation) to suggest that Kohala is the author of this work. But, analyzing the subject matter, which belonged to the period around the 16th century C.E. (more than a thousand years post-Kohala) prove that Kohala, the contemporary of Bharata, could not have been the author of 罢腻濒补濒补办峁�a峁嘺尘.