365bet娱乐

Sang墨ta谤腻箩补 (1456 C.E.) of Mah膩r膩峁嘺 Kumbha contains a number of references to Kohala. While discussing the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 (ref.para 2.1.4.2), Kumbha says that he does not agree with Kohala in this context and goes to explain that Kohala has followed 惭补迟补峁単补 in this instance. In fact, it is quite the other way around. It is 惭补迟补峁単补 who cites the authority of Kohala while explaining the 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara 尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻, thereby making these particular entries on Kohala contradictory and confusing. Subsequently, Kohala鈥檚 opinion that 驳腻尘产丑墨谤墨 产丑腻峁Ｄ� is 耻辫腻峁単补 as opposed to Dattila who holds it to be 产丑腻峁Ｄ佱箙ga is mentioned (ref.para 2.1.8). 骋腻尘产丑墨谤墨 has been listed under the 产丑腻峁�a峁単补 谤腻驳补蝉 by 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 and has been explained by Kallin膩tha. The mention of Dattila and Kohala together in this instance is worthy of mention. Dattila is well established as an author who confined his work to the field of 驳腻苍诲丑补谤惫补. The concepts of 谤腻驳腻峁単补, 办谤颈测腻峁単补, 产丑腻峁Ｄ佱箙ga and 耻辫腻峁単补 belong unmistakably to the 诲别艣墨 tradition. This again is a confusing reference. Then the alternate names of the 艣谤耻迟颈蝉 namely 艣谤耻迟颈, 苍墨迟颈, 蝉别苍腻, 办补惫颈迟腻 and 肠补尘辫奴 are listed. 

The 狈峁泃测补谤补迟苍补办辞艣补 contains the list of nine breathing techniques mentioned in 厂补峁単墨迟补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补 along with their explanations (ref.para 2.2.7). There are also long quotations from 碍补濒腻苍颈诲丑颈 of Kallin膩tha. Kumbha cites quotations on madhupa c膩r墨s and kara 惫补谤迟补苍腻蝉 from 厂补峁単墨迟补尘别谤耻 of Kohala while acknowledging the fact that he has drawn his material from Kallin膩tha鈥檚 work. As seen above, a delineation of these subjects (尘补诲丑耻辫补肠腻谤墨蝉 and 惫补谤迟补苍腻蝉) and the nine breathing techniques is also found in A艣okamalla鈥檚 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补. 

Though there is common material to be found between 厂补峁僩墨迟补-谤腻箩补 and 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补 with respect to the nine techniques of breathing. The names of the varieties match exactly except for one which is called prabaddha in 厂补峁単墨迟补raja and 辫谤补惫峁沝诲丑补 in 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补. Further, the verses explaining these are also different. The list of the nine varieties beyond doubt was spoken of by Kohala as it is seen repeatedly in three works namely, 厂补峁単墨迟补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补, 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补 and 厂补峁単墨迟补-谤腻箩补. But the same cannot be said of the 艣濒辞办补蝉 explaining these. First of all the explanations are not to be found in 厂补峁単墨迟补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补. Secondly those in 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补 and 厂补峁単墨迟补谤腻箩补 are different. Therefore it is probable that the explanations for the nine types of breathing techniques were supplied by the respective authors of these works and was not a contribution of Kohala. The Kohala perceived by Kumbha seems to bear strong links to 厂补峁単墨迟补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补 and 碍补濒腻苍颈诲丑颈. Except the reference to 诲惫腻诲补艣补-svara-尘奴谤肠肠丑补苍腻 and the names of 艣谤耻迟颈蝉, all citations lead to either of these works. The significant aspect about this work is that it is one of the few books that represent a strain that is found repeated in other 濒补办峁�a峁嘺驳谤补苍迟丑补蝉.