365bet娱乐

笔补峁囜笉颈迟 惭补丑腻尘补丑辞辫腻诲丑测腻测补 M 尝补办峁�m补峁嘺 S奴rin was a renowned Sanskrit Scholar and writer who lived about a century ago. He was born in August 1859 in the village of P奴nalveli near 艢r墨villiputhur, Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu. He made an intensive study of Vy膩karana and Vedanta and had deep erudition in both these 艢膩str膩s. He was a disciple of Subba Dik峁�itar a well known scholar of that time. He worked as a Sanskrit 笔补峁囜笉颈迟 at the age of 46 (1896) at the famous St. Peters College, Tanjore and continued there till the year 1907. After 1907 he was employed as a 笔补峁囜笉颈迟 in the Pachayappa鈥檚 High school and continued there till 1920. After retirement he delivered discourses on the 叠丑补驳补惫补诲驳墨迟补, 叠丑腻驳补惫补迟补 and 痴别诲腻苍迟补蝉奴迟谤补蝉 in many places in South India. He passed away on the 17^th May 1928.

He was a talented poet and composed twenty four works in total. Among them two Mah膩k膩vy膩s, seven Laghu 碍腻惫测腻蝉, four Prose works, Three dramas, one Philosophical works and seven commentaries.

Among them 叠丑补驳补惫补迟辫腻诲腻产丑测耻诲补测补 is considered as his best work. It is a 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补 which narrates the legendary biography of 艢补峁卥补谤腻肠腻谤测补 of K膩ladi (788-820 AD) in simple and beautiful Sanskrit. The 办腻惫测补 is modelled on the 艢补峁卥补谤补digvijay膩s of the medieval writers but it stands out as a work composed during the time of Indian Renaissance, underlining the spiritual unity and cultural identity of our nation.

In the present thesis entitled 鈥楤HAGAVATPADABHYUDAYA OF LAKSMANA SURIN -A CRITICAL STUDY鈥� an attempt is made to study this 办腻惫测补 and bring to light its contributions to Sanskrit literature.

Scope and Relevance

Though the book is a product of Modern age, no serious study has been carried out so far. The poem unveils the legendary incidents of 艢补峁卥补谤补鈥檚 life. No one can deny the fact that he was able to create a feeling of 鈥渙neness鈥� in society through the Advaita philosophy. The author, 尝补办峁�m补峁嘺 S奴rin, is of the view that the idea of 艢补峁卥补谤补 will go a long way towards to unite the people of Modern India. As he is a staunch nationalist, he has spent much of his time in learning more and more about traditional Sanskrit knowledge and the propagation of its better side and values. He has turned 艢补峁卥补谤补 as an icon for unifying the people of India culturally and socially. In this aspect he shows the legacy of the era of Indian Renaissance.

The thesis contains four chapters. The first chapter deals with life and works of 尝补办峁�m补峁嘺 S奴rin. Sanskrit and its contribution to Indian Renaissance, the role of Sanskrit scholars who wrote Mah膩k膩vy膩s on great heroes of India, 艢补峁卥补谤补 an icon unity of Indian glorious past, and such contextual features relevant for the study, along with the poetic experience, 惫峁泃迟补, 补濒补峁卥补谤补, rasa etc of the 办腻惫测补. The second chapter presents the content analysis of 叠丑补驳补惫补迟辫腻诲腻产丑测耻诲补测补. Here important ala峁卥膩r膩s 惫峁泃迟补 and rasa are mentioned. The third chapter deals with the discussion of 艢补峁卥补谤补鈥檚 philosophy as found in the references to it in 叠丑补驳补惫补迟辫腻诲腻产丑测耻诲补测补. It discusses the socio-spiritual conditions of 8^th century AD, the condition of Hindusim in the 8^th century A D and follows the major themes of 艢补峁卥补谤补鈥檚 Advaita Vedanta, Brahman or the Supreme Reality, 闯墨惫补 or Individual Soul, Jagat or Universe, 莫艣惫补谤补 or God, 惭腻测补 or Illusion, 惭辞办峁�a or Liberation and Means of Liberation. Further 艢补峁卥补谤补鈥檚 definition of Bhakti, relation between 闯帽腻苍补 and Bhakti, theory of Causation, Cosmology, Subtle Body, Gross Body etc are also mentioned. The fourth chapter describes similarities and dissimilarities between important 艢补峁卥补谤补digvijay膩s and 叠丑补驳补惫补迟辫腻诲腻产丑测耻诲补测补. The disputes over 艢补峁卥补谤补鈥檚 birthplace, disputes over Upanayana, place of 厂补尘腻诲丑颈, death of mother are discussed along with the common similarities of different 艢补峁卥补谤补digvijay膩s.

As a Sanskrit 办腻惫测补 written in the early twentieth century, it makes one proud of India鈥檚 glorious past. Going through the lines of the poet a reader has to recognise the wonderful life of 艢补峁卥补谤补. 叠丑补驳补惫补迟辫腻诲腻产丑测耻诲补测补, undoubtedly gives a vision of aesthetic, social, cultural, spiritual richness of the country. The methodology used in this study is analytical and descriptive. Unfortunately the text of 叠丑补驳补惫补迟辫腻诲腻产丑测耻诲补测补 is now out of print and difficult to produce. Therefore it is reproduced in the appendix. There have not been any previous studies conducted on 叠丑补驳补惫补迟辫腻诲腻产丑测耻诲补测补. So, there has been a lack of information from any perspective on this subject.

I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude to my supervising Teacher, Dr. V.N Damodaran Unni, Former Campus Director in Regional Centre, Koyilandy, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady for his valuable guidance and suggestions regarding the matter and manner.

I have no words to express my gratitude for the immense support given to me Dr. T Vasudevan, Visiting Professor in Comparative Literature, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady. His erudition and deep insight into the subject have been a constant source of inspiration.

I would like to record my gratitude to Prof. Dr: P.K Dharmaraj, Vice Chancellor and Former Head of the Department of Sanskrit Sahitya, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady.

Much Gratitude is also hereby recorded to Dr. V.R Muralidharan, Prof and Head of the Department of Sanskrit Sahitya, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady.

I am also grateful to Prof. P.C Muraleemadhavan (Retd) Head of the Department of Sanskrit Sahitya, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady. I am thankful to my Principal Krishnadas O.K, Pavandoor Higher Secondary School, Kozhikode.

I am obliged to the Librarian and other staff of the library at Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Regional Centre, Koyilandy, and the main centre Chief Librarian and other staff of the library. I express my thanks to the Madras University Library, Adayar Library, Calicut University Library, Kerala University Library and the Library of Govt. Sanskrit College, Trippunithura.

The following personalities have also been immensely helpful to this endeavour and I wish to thank each of them. They are: Dr. T.S. Nishad (Assit. Prof, Department of Vedanta), Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Regional Centre Koyilandy, Dr. N.P. Sreejisha (Guest Lecture), Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Koyilandy, M.I. Seena (HSST English), Pavandoor Higher Secondary School, Kozhikode, A.K. Padmakumar (HSST Malayalam), Pavandoor Higher Secondary School, Kozhikode etc.

The emotional support provided by staff and non teaching staff of Pavandoor Higher Secondary School, My friends each one are special in his or her own way, is gratefully remembered here.

I further express my indebtedness to my parents, husband and daughters and all over family members who have inspired me in the core of my work. I thankful to one and all for their noble services rendered to me directly or indirectly through out.

LATHIKA M. P

Koyliandy,