365bet

Vakyapadiya of Bhartrihari

by K. A. Subramania Iyer | 1965 | 391,768 words

The English translation of the Vakyapadiya by Bhartrihari including commentary extracts and notes. The Vakyapadiya is an ancient Sanskrit text dealing with the philosophy of language. Bhartrhari authored this book in three parts and propounds his theory of Sphotavada (sphota-vada) which understands language as consisting of bursts of sounds conveyi...

This book contains Sanskrit text which you should never take for granted as transcription mistakes are always possible. Always confer with the final source and/or manuscript.

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation of verse 3.7.73:

अन्तर्भूतणिजर्थाना� दुह्यादीना� णिजन्तवत� �
सिद्धं पूर्वे� कर्मत्वं णिजन्त� नियमस्तथ� � ७३ �

antarbhūtaṇijarthānā� duhyādīnā� ṇijantavat |
siddha� pūrveṇa karmatva� ṇijanta� niyamasٲٳ || 73 ||

73. In the case of roots like √dܳ which involve the meaning of the causative affix, cow, etc. become objects by the first rule (P. 1.4.49) as in the case of roots ending in the causative affix. That is why there is restriction in regard to the roots ending in the causative affix.

Commentary

It is now stated that, according to some, the object is the main one in the case of these enumerated roots also.

[Read verse 73 above]

(The last part of the should be: ṇiᲹԳٲԾⲹ ٲٳ).

[Others think that the object taught under P. 1.4.51 can be looked upon as the main object, because the roots enumerated under that ūٰ imply the idea of somebody causing somebody else to do something (ṣa), that is, the meaning of ṇi. Something becomes the karma of ṇi by P. 1.4.49. gā� dogdhi paya� = “he extracts milk off the cow� would be explained as: Kṣarantī� gā� kṣārayati = ‘he prompts the cow which drips (milk) to do so. Here, in reality, milk is more important than the cow, but linguistically, it is vice-versa, that is why in �gaur duhyate paya� = ‘the cow is milked milk, the verb expresses the fact of the cow being the object and not that of the milk. Strictly speaking, the cow being the starting point of the milk, it should be Բ and take the fifth case-affix, but it becomes the object because the latter is taught later. All the roots enumerated under P. 1.4.51 can be explained as involving the meaning of the causative affix. The restriction taught in P. 1.4.52 does not apply to these roots because that restriction applies only to roots ending in the causative affix and these roots are not so.]

It is now explained how the important and the unimportant can both become the object.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: