365bet娱乐

Mantra 2.8.1.

1. Now is taught the seven-fold. Let one meditate on the seven-fold Harmonious in a sentence. Pradyumna in that sentence which has 鈥榟i峁呪�� in it, 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补 in that which has 鈥�Para鈥�; 痴补谤腻丑补 in that which has 鈥樐佲��.鈥�112.

[Note鈥擜di岣モ�攖he aspect of Lord called 膧di岣�, because in the beginning (膧di) He appears as a boar (痴补谤腻丑补); this 痴补谤腻丑补 aspect is called 膧di.]

Mantra 2.8.2.

狈腻谤腻测补峁嘺 is in that sentence which has the syllable 鈥淯t鈥� in it, Aniruddha in that which has 鈥�Prati,鈥� 狈峁泂颈峁僪补 in that which has 鈥淯pa鈥� and 厂补峁卥补谤峁�a峁嘺 in that which has 鈥淣i鈥� in it.鈥�113.

摆狈辞迟别.鈥扩辫补诲谤补惫补岣モ赌攃补濒濒别诲 upadrava, the cause calamity or upadrava. In this aspect the Lord is called 狈峁泂颈峁僪补 and is the cause of all national calamities or misfortunes.]

Mantra 2.8.3.

3. The Lord gives to him Release which is the milk of speech. He becomes rich in food, and able to consume food (healthy), who knowing Him thus, meditates on the seven-fold Harmonious.鈥�114.

Madhva鈥檚 commentary called the Bh膩峁�ya:

Having thus described the five-fold meditation on the Lord, the 艢谤耻迟颈 now mentions seven-fold meditation on him. The words Hi峁卥膩ra, 笔谤补蝉迟腻惫补, 鲍诲驳墨迟丑补, and 笔谤补迟颈丑腻谤补, have already been explained before, as the names of the various forms of the Lord; namely, Pradyumna, 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补, 狈腻谤腻测补峁嘺, Aniruddha, and 厂补峁卥补谤峁�a峁嘺. Two more names are now mentioned. They are 膧di, and Upadrava.

The Commentator, therefore, explains these two words by quoting an authority:鈥�

Thus it is said:鈥斺�淭he Lord is called 膧di because He is the cause of the beginning of a Kalpa, (and the word 膧di means beginning). The sportful Lord 碍别艣补惫补 Himself in the beginning of a Kalpa assumed the form of a 痴补谤腻丑补 (boar), therefore, this form is called 膧di. The Lord is called Upadrava (or 鈥榩ublic calamity鈥�) in his 础惫补迟腻谤补 of 狈峁泂颈峁僪补, because in this form He destroyed the great evil-doer called 贬颈谤补峁噛补办补艣颈辫耻.鈥�

(Lest one may think that the syllables Hum, Pra, 膧, Ut, Prati, Upa, and Ni are identical with Pradyumna, etc., the Commentator now explains this 艢谤耻迟颈:鈥�)

In a sentence containing the syllable 鈥楬um,鈥� the Lord in His aspect of Pradyumna constantly resides; in a sentence containing the syllable 鈥溎�鈥� the Lord in the form of 痴补谤腻丑补 (Boar) has His abode, in a sentence having Pra, dwells 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补; similarly, the Lord in His aspect of 狈腻谤腻测补峁嘺 is in that sentence which has the syllable 鈥淯t,鈥� in His aspect of Aniruddha, He is in the sentence which has the syllable 鈥淧rati鈥�; in His aspect of 狈峁泂颈峁僪补 (man-lion), He is in that sentence, which contains the syllable 鈥淯pa鈥�; in His aspect of 厂补峁卥补谤峁�a峁嘺, He is in the sentence that has the syllable 鈥淣i.鈥�

This shows that the syllables 鈥淗um,鈥� 鈥淧ra, 鈥渆tc., are not names of mere syllables; had it been so, the proposition 鈥渙ne should meditate on the seven-fold Lord in the sentence,鈥� becomes meaningless. These, therefore, are rightly explained as syllables occurring in a sentence. A question arises here, what is the 顿别惫补迟腻 of that sentence in which some one of these seven syllables does not occur?

To this the Commentator replies:鈥�

If any one of these syllables is absent from a sentence, so many as are present in it, they will be the 顿别惫补迟腻s of the sentence.

If of these syllables any one is omitted, so many as remain will regulate the 顿别惫补迟腻 of the sentence.

Thus he who meditates always on the All-pervading 痴颈峁ａ箛耻 called V膩k, in His seven-fold aspect, for Him the Lord becomes the Giver of all desires and objects (literally becomes the milker of all objects for him.)