365betÓéÀÖ

Guhyagarbha Tantra (with Commentary)

by Gyurme Dorje | 1987 | 304,894 words

The English translation of the Guhyagarbha Tantra, including Longchenpa's commentary from the 14th century. The whole work is presented as a critical investigation into the Nyingma School of Tibetan Buddhism, of which the Guhyagarbhatantra is it's principle text. It contains twenty-two chapters teaching the essence and practice of Mahayoga, which s...

Text 3.11 (Commentary)

[Guhyagarbha-Tantra, Text section 3.11]

Their nature Itself does not degenerate from reality�
Genuine reality, dualistic in an illusory manner.
Does not differentiate between possessor and possessed.
It is the pure expanse itself, the unique mode. [11] ...

[Tibetan]

rang-bzhin nyid-las nyams-pa-med /
yang-dag sgyu-ma'i tshul-gnyis-su /
bdag-dang bdag-gi gzhan-med-de /
rnam-dag dbyings-nyid tshul-gcig-go / [11]

Commentary:

[Teaching that from the very moment of this appearance its nature is reality:]

Although it appears as such, the nature (rang-bzhin) of this ²õ²¹á¹ƒsÄå°ù²¹ does not degenerate from (las nyams-pa med) the reality (nyid). sameness or great perfection of primordial liberation. This is because its nature is indeed emptiness.

Accordingly it also says in the King of Contemplation (T. 127):

The conquerors� son destroys objective form.
All existences that there are are primordially empty.
Those who uphold the extreme of ephemeral emptiness
And those who are puerile sophists cannot dispute this.

From the very moment when ²õ²¹á¹ƒsÄå°ù²¹ appears, it does not actually exist but is the abiding nature of genuine reality (yang-dag). It does appear to be dualistic in a (gnyis-su) mere relative or illusory manner (sgyu-ma'i tshul), but when analysed does not differentiate between (gzhan-med-de) the possessor (bdag) or subject of ²õ²¹á¹ƒsÄå°ù²¹ and the possessed (dang bdag-gi) objects of a ²õ²¹á¹ƒsÄå°ù²¹ and ²Ô¾±°ù±¹Äåṇa. Just as the the appearances in a dream and the dreamer's own mind are not dualistically differentiated. Mind-as-such is perceived in that manner.

It says accordingly in the ³§Å«³Ù°ù²¹ of the Descent to ³¢²¹á¹…kÄå (T. 107):

Mind-as-such, where there is no object,
Is mistakenly seen as an external object.
Through habitual tendencies, the agitated mind
Actually comes into appearance.

However, when ²õ²¹á¹ƒsÄå°ù²¹ appears it itself (nyid) is the unique (gcig) primordial mode (tshul) in the pure (rnam-dag) and self-manifesting expanse (dbyings). the pure reality. Thus the Intention of the spontaneous perfect buddha-body of reality is one of unique (gcig-go) equilibrium in its great primordial pervasion of all ²õ²¹á¹ƒsÄå°ù²¹ and ²Ô¾±°ù±¹Äåṇa.

It says in the Root Stanzas of Madhyamaka entitled Discriminative Awareness (T. 3824):

There is not the slightest difference
Between ²õ²¹á¹ƒsÄå°ù²¹ and ²Ô¾±°ù±¹Äåṇa.
The distinctions between these two
Do not even minutely exist.

And in the Ornament of Emergent Realisation (T. 3786):

There is sameness with respect to existence and quiescence.

[The fourth, (teaching that bewildering appearances are the miraculous display of mind, comments on Ch. 3.12):]

[Read next page]

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: