365bet娱乐

1034
fashioned on those of Subandhu's VK, and there are numerous
parallel's in thought, arrangement and general treatment bet-
29 ween the Kad. and the VK. Inspite of all these, none of
the veterans have called B膩na an imitator of Subandhu!
As has been aptly put by Dr. J.M.Shukla, it was a re-
gular practice of Indian poets to lift an idea or an expre-
ssion from an earlier writer, dress it in a different garb
and try to demonstrate his superiority in skill.30 If, them,
Dhanap膩la utilizes all these devices for his purpose in a
appropriate places and proper occasions in the scheme of his
quite independently well-knit plot-structure, how can one
possibly brand him as an "imitator", and get away with it
without being unreasonable or irrationally careless ?
From the forty-four parallel passages cited by Prof.
31.
Amaranath Pandey, it may be proved that Dhanap膩la had kept
before his mind's eye the style of B膩峁嘺, with a view to im-
ms prove upon, and try to surpass, it while sailing safe
of his worthy predecessor's flaws of too much fondness for
incessant prose, too long descriptions comprising too long
compounds, and too much proneness to pun. B When such a
sensitive Sanskrit veteran rhetorician like Anandavardhana
32 would not brand such a tendency as "imitation", what locus
standi do the modern critics of Dhanapala have to rush in
to denegrate such a first-class Sanskrit poet and a versatile
29.VK(S),Introduction,p.45./30.ibid.,p.46./31.BAP,pp.63-71.
32. DHL, IV, 16: 啶�鈥�啶�啶� 啶むう啶�啶� 啶班ぎ啷嵿く啶� 啶�啶傕い啷嵿�� 啶侧�嬥�曕じ啷嵿く 啶曕た啶炧�嵿�氞た啶む��, 啶膏�嵿か啷佮ぐ啶む�� 啶膏�嵿か啷佮ぐ啶苦い啶�啶苦う
啶�啶苦い啷�啶�
啶�啷佮う啷嵿ぇ啶苦ぐ啶�啷嵿く啷佮�溹�嵿�溹�� 啶灌�嬥い啷� 啷� 啶呧え啷佮�椸い啶�啶�啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿さ啶氞�嵿�涏ぞ啶�啶�啶� 啶掂じ啷嵿い啷� 啶膏い啶� 啶曕�� 啶むぞ啶︵�冟�曕�傕��, 啶膏�佮�曕さ啶�-
啶班�傕お啶ㄠた啶�啶о�嵿え啶ㄠ�嵿え啶苦う啷嵿く啶むぞ啶�
啶侧�嬥お啶�啶むた 啷�
[pi tadapi ramya峁� ya峁僼ra lokasya ki帽cit, sphurati sphuritamida
尘颈迟墨测补
buddhirabhyujj膩 hote | anugatamapi p奴rvacch膩yay膩 vastu sataha ke t膩d峁沰奴峁�, sukavi-
谤奴辫补苍颈产补诲丑苍补苍苍颈诲测补迟腻峁�
lopayati ||
]