Yajnavalkya-smriti (Vyavaharadhyaya)—Critical study
by Kalita Nabanita | 2017 | 87,413 words
This page relates ‘Vyavaharapadas Enumerated in the Vyavaharadhyaya� of the study on the Vyavaharadhyaya of the Yajnavalkya-smriti: one of the most prominent Smritis dealing with Dharmashastra (ancient Indian science of law), dating to the 1st century B.C. The Yajnavalkyasmriti scientifically arranges its contents in three sections: Acara (proper conduct), Vyavahara (proper law) and Prayashcitta (expiation). Vyavahara deals with judicial procedure and legal system such as substantive law and procedural law.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Chapter 2.2a - The Vyavahārapadas Enumerated in the ղⲹⲹ
The topic or subject-matter of ⲹ is known as ⲹpada. According to Manu, pada means ٳԲ.[1] ñⲹ states that if a person, oppressed by one or more persons in a manner, transgressing the law of ṛt and established usages, applies or complains to the king (or any officer in charge of the administration of justice), then it forms the ⲹpada.88 Vijñāneśvara explains the word pada as ṣaⲹ, meaning subject-matter.[2] 貹첹, commenting on it says, 貹岹� ٳԲ� nimittamiti yāvat.[3]
This definition shows three elements necessary to constitute a ⲹpada, i.e.
- the breach of a rule prescribed by the ṛt or by a customary rule,
- injuring forcibly or illegally someone from violation of that rule
- and finally the complaint of the victim.
From this definition, given by ñⲹ, it appears that ⲹ貹岹 indicates and includes those disputes, which are started or brought before the court at the instances of the parties.[4] The word 岹貹岹 is used by some writers like ṭiⲹ, 岹, etc., instead of ⲹ貹岹.[5] Sometimes, ñⲹ seems to have distinguished between 岹 and ⲹ. վ岹 is used in the sense of lawsuit or case, whereas ⲹ is used to denote judicial procedure.[6] Therefore, ⲹ貹岹 indicates the process of defining and classifying disputes or offences under different heads, which are known as titles of law.
For convenience, the disputes have been classified under eighteen heads or titles generally called ⲹ貹岹 or 岹貹岹. It signifies various kinds of disputes existed among people in those days. The formal enumeration of eighteen 岹貹岹s are found in the ѲԳܲṛt.
Manu has recognized the eighteen 岹貹岹s in the following manner[7] :-
- ṛṇԲ (non-payment of debts),
- Ծṣe貹 (deposit and pledge),
- 峾ⲹ (sale without ownership),
- ūⲹ-ܳٳٳԲ (concerns among partners or partnership),
- 岹ٳٲԲ貹첹 (resumption of gifts),
- ٲԲ (non-payment of wages),
- ṃv屹ⲹپ (non-performance of agreement or conventions),
- ⲹԳśⲹ (recession of sale and purchase),
- svāmipāla岹 (disputes between the owner (of cattle) and herdsman),
- sīmā岹 (disputes regarding boundaries),
- 岹ṇḍṣy (assault and violence),
- ṣy (use of abusive words and defamation,
- steya (theft),
- (robbery and violence),
- ٰīṃgṇa (adultery),
- ٰīṃd (duties of man and wife),
- 岵 (partition) and
- ūٲⲹ (gambling and betting).
ñⲹ, in the ղⲹⲹ of his work, has not provided any separate list of ⲹ貹岹s like that of the ѲԳܲṛt. Rather he has treated eah title distinctly with heading as one 첹ṇa.
Thus, ñⲹ’s enumeration of ⲹ貹岹s are found as follows:-
- ṛṇԲ (non-payment of debts),
- upanidhi (laws relating to deposits),
- dāya岵 (divisions of property among heirs),
- sīmā岹 (disputes regarding boundaries),
- svāmīpāla岹 (disputes between the owner (of cattle) and their herdsmen),
- 峾ⲹ (sale without ownership),
- 岹ٳԾ첹 (laws relating to gift and its acceptance),
- īԳśⲹ (rescission of purchase),
- ܱٲśśūṣ� (laws relating to breach of contract of service),
- ṃv-ⲹپ (breach of established usage),
- ٲԲ (non-payment of wages),
- ūٲⲹ (gambling and betting),
- ṣy (use of abusive words and defamation)
- 岹ṇḍṣy (assault and violence)
- (robbery and violence)
- īṃpԲ (non-delivery after sale),
- ūⲹ-ܳٳٳԲ (trading by partnership),
- steya (theft),
- ٰīṃgṇa (adultery) and
- īṇa첹 (miscellaneous rules).
ñⲹ in the ղⲹⲹ has not followed the eighteen divisions of ⲹ as given by Manu. It is necessary to take a glance at the divergence, as to the order, number and nomenclature of the ⲹpadas found in ñⲹ with that of in Manu and 岹. It would throw light on ñⲹ’s thinking and his maturity in treating the titles of law or ⲹ.
The difference of the ⲹpadas in Manu, ñⲹ and 岹[8] is shown below:-
ѲԳܲṛt 1. ṛṇԲ, 2. Ծṣe貹, 3. 峾ⲹ, 4. ūⲹ-ܳٳٳԲ, 5. 岹ٳٲԲ貹첹, 6. ٲԲ, 7. ṃv屹ⲹپ, 8. ⲹԳśⲹ, 9. svāmipāla岹, 10. sīmā岹, 11. 岹ṇḍṣy, 12. ṣy, 13. steya, 14. , 15. ٰīṃgṇa, 16. ٰīṃd, 17. 岵, 18. ūٲⲹ. |
ñⲹsmṛti 1. ṛṇԲ, 2. upanidhi, 3. dāya岵, 4. sīmā岹, 5. svāmīpāla岹, 6. 峾ⲹ, 7. 岹ٳԾ첹, 8. īԳśⲹ, 9. ܱٲśśūṣ�, 10. ṃv-vyatikrama, 11. ٲԲ, 12. ūٲⲹ, 13. ṣy, 14. 岹ṇḍṣy, 15. , 16. īṃpԲ, 17. ūⲹܳٳٳԲ, 18. steya, 19. ٰīṃgṇa, 20. īṇa첹. |
岹smṛti 1. ṛṇԲ, 2. Ծṣe貹/ upanidhi, 3. ūⲹ-ܳٳٳԲ, 4. 岹ٳԾ첹, 5. ܱٲśśūṣ�, 6. ٲԲԲ첹, 7. 峾ⲹ, 8. īṃpԲ, 9. īԳśⲹ, 10. ⲹԲ貹첹, 11. sīmā岹, 12. ٰīṃsDz, 13. ⲹ岵, 14. , 15. ṣy, 16. 岹ṇḍṣy, 17. ūٲⲹ, 18. īṇa첹. |
From the arrangement of the ⲹpadas in Manu, ñⲹ and 岹 which is mentioned above, it can be observed that the number of ⲹpadas is highest in the ñⲹsmṛti. In the ղⲹⲹ of the ñⲹsmṛti, the duties of husband and wife (ٰīṃd) are not included which is described as one of the ⲹpadas in the ѲԳܲṛt and in the 岹smṛti. ñⲹ might have considered it as a subject not falling within the proper domain of ⲹ or law. Therefore, the same is described under the section named as the 峦ⲹ.[9]
ñⲹ has introduced two more topics viz. (1) ܱٲśśūṣ� and (2) īṇa첹, thereby deviating from the eighteenfold division of ⲹpadas as given by Manu. Moreover, the topic ⲹԳśⲹ is divided into two, thus raising the ⲹpadas, in all, twenty. 岹 also follows the changes introduced by ñⲹ. He has added the two topics and split one topic into two like ñⲹ. Svāmīpāla岹 has been separately discussed in Manu and ñⲹ, but 岹 deals it as a part of sīmā岹. ñⲹ has treated adultery or ٰīṃgṇa as an independent topic, while 岹 discusses it under the title ٰīṃsDz. Both Manu and ñⲹ have treated ṣy and 岹ṇḍṣy as individual title of laws, while 岹 describes both in one chapter. 岹 includes steya under and in the appendix. These are the main characteristics of ⲹpadas in Manu, ñⲹ and 岹, which help to show the contribution and advancement of ñⲹ towards the branches or divisions of law that regulated the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal proceeding.
The ñⲹsmṛti does not provide or make a clear division of ⲹpadas into civil and criminal laws. However, an indication of the distinction between civil and criminal disputes seems to have appeared among the ⲹpadas of the ñⲹsmṛti when the author speaks of artha岹.[10] In later stages, the ṛt writers have developed the distinction among the eighteen ⲹpadas into two groups. ṛh貹پ, as quoted in the ṛtcandrikā, states that there are two kinds of ⲹ, those arising out of wealth and those arising out of injury. Fourteen of them have the origin in wealth and four in injury or violence.[11]
It is to be mentioned here that these classifications of ⲹpadas should not be considered as exhaustive. Manu suggests this fact after giving the names of eighteen ⲹpadas. He says, “Depending on the eternal law, let him (king) decide the disputes of men which mostly (ū⾱ṣṭ�) contend on the titles just mentioned.�[12] Commentators like ѱپٳ, Kullūka, etc., have made this point clear that the word ‘most� i.e. ū⾱ṣṭ� used by Manu indicates that there can be more ⲹpadas than eighteen. These ⲹpadas do not include all disputes but only the largest and most important among them.[13] These classifications of ⲹpadas and their rules seem to have been derived directly from actual life and is in agreement with the necessities of the life of those days.[14]
Thus, it can be that the ⲹpadas enumerated by ñⲹ in the ղⲹⲹ is having some difference from the traditional number of eighteen ⲹpadas as mentioned by Manu, and perhaps the reason is that it embraced most of the disputes, which arose among people during those periods.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
[3]:
貹첹, Ibid., 2.5
[4]:
Kane, P.V., Op.cit., Volume 3, page250
[6]:
ñⲹsmṛti,2.8, 305
[7]:
teṣāmādyamṛṇԲ� nikṣepo’svāmivikraya�/ sambhūya ca samutthāna� 岹ٳٲԲ貹첹ca// vetanasyaiva cādāna� ṃvaśca vyatikrama�/ krayavikrayānuśayo 岹� svāmipālayo�// sīmā岹dharmaśca pāruṣye daṇḍavācike/ ٱⲹ� ca � caiva ٰīṃgṇameva ca// strīpuṃdharmo 岵śca dyūtamāhvaya eva ca/ padānyaṣṭādaśaitāni ⲹsthitāviha// ѲԳܲṛt, 8.4-7
[8]:
岹smṛti, 1.16-19
[9]:
ñⲹsmṛti,1.51-89
[10]:
[11]:
ṛtcandrikā, ղⲹṇḍ 1, page20
[14]:
Jolly,J., Hindu Law and Custom, page35