Satirical works of Kshemendra (study)
by Arpana Devi | 2017 | 60,954 words
This page relates ‘Prominent Satirical Works in Sanskrit� part of the study on the Satirical works of Kshemendra: an 11th century poet from Kashmir, who composed three satirical works. Kshemendra himself says that in composing the satirical works his only motive is to reform the mindset of the people.—He exposes all the vices and follies prevailing in the society with the intention to reform it.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
7. Prominent Satirical Works in Sanskrit
Searching for the base of satirical literature in Sanskrit appears to be a rather difficult job. It is a fact that in satire, there is the involvement of suggested meaning which is termed ղⲹñᲹ[1] in Sanskrit rhetorics. But the meaning conveyed or supported to be conveyed by ղⲹñᲹ are difficult to be said as similar to those suggested in a composition of satirical nature. Same is the observation in respect of Vakrokti[2] also. The meanings conveyed through Vakrokti bears importance mostly of poetic importance. However, the meanings conveyed through satirical texts become more suitable or of more importance for practical life. Of course, ղⲹñᲹ and Vakrokti both having base on suggestion, are two different literary elements which are appealing more for literary purpose; while satire is more focused upon utility of the meanings, not for mere poetic pleasure.
Pure satirical writing in Sanskrit is not much in quantity. In fact, of satire or satiric verses in the proper sense, Sanskrit has very little to show.[3] Sanskrit composition in which vices and follies are primarily ridiculed is not much available in Sanskrit literature. Satire as a separate literary form or genre does not find its position. Early Sanskrit ālaṃkārikas also did not mention satire as a distinct form of literature. Generally, what is understood by the word ‘satire� such as caricature, ridicule, skit etc. all these were totally absent from the purport of Sanskrit literary compositions. Ancient literature was based on devotional themes narrating the doings of divine or semi-divine personages. Therefore, there was little scope for depicting humour and satire on the part of the poet. Most of the Sanskrit literature is based on the theme of love story of kings and queens and lacks in depicting the common life of people. Therefore, there is hardly any scope for satire. In Sanskrit literature, there are also few comic elements having erotic themes, but these works cannot be designated as satire. These works may contain satiric elements presented through the acts of the fools, cheats or rouges, but these are not portrayed with anger and disdain; on the contrary they are lampooned in mild way.
In Sanskrit literature, the works based on social topic is not much available. The works based on social topics reveal various phases of the contemporary society. These types of works depict common life of people with all their frailties. A writer, in such works may satirize such frailties incidentally or as a whole. It was ṣeԻ who utilized satire as an effective weapon to expose vices and follies prevailing in the society. In his works namely the 屹, the and the ٱśDZ貹ś, he depicts a real picture of the society and such narratives are not so much in volume and character in regard to most of the writers of Sanskrit literature. In Sanskrit literature there is no other work like ṣeԻ having amusing social picture. Therefore, the works of ṣeԻ based on social topics finds special attention of the scholars. In Sanskrit, generally there is a tradition to depict the characters of legendary personalities like ṛṣṇa, 峾, etc. as heroes and heroines with a motive to portray their ideals in the society. But ṣeԻ is unique in this respect. It may be said that ṣeԻ hostiles to the tradition to which generally Sanskrit poets are attached. He introduces a new trend in Sanskrit literature. He is not ready to show the ideals only but also wants to present before the readers a real picture of the society. ṣeԻ selects ordinary men and women from different walks of life living in the society. He depicts real like characters to represent the contemporary society.
However, if one is pinning down to a beginning of Sanskrit satire then some earliest datable ṇa works like , ʲ峾ṛt첹, ٳūٲṭaṃv岹 and 岹ḍiٲ첹 may be helpful in which satire is incidentally introduced. These ṇa[4] works or monologue plays prove ideal for Sanskrit satire.[5] These four oldest datable ṇa plays are collectively known as ٳܰṇ�. According to A.B. Keith, ‘none of these plays need be older than 1000 A.D.�[6] In the ٳܰṇ�, low humour and polite satire is recognizable, which gradually disappears from the later ṇa plays. Later ṇas are entirely erotic.
Besides these ṇa works, there are some other Sanskrit works of writers prior to or contempories of ṣeԻ, in which satire is incidentally introduced. Among them some prominent works have been discussed below-
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
[2]:
anyasyānyārthaka� vākyamanyathā yojayedyadi/
Բⲹ� śleṣeṇa kākvā vā sā vakroktistato dvidhā// ibid.,X.9
[4]:
Among the ten types of Sanskrit Dramas, as narrated by Bharata, ṇa is one of them which contain a single Act and a single character. The վṭa is the sole character of the ṇa play. The վṭa carries imaginary conversation with other characters but they do not appear on the stage. The ṭa is depicted as a friend of the hero in his love affairs.
[5]:
Chaitanya, Krisna, History of Sanskrit Literatre, p.354
[6]:
Dey, Sunil Kr., Aspects of Sanskrit Literature, p.1