365bet

Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita (comparative study)

by Ranjni M. | 2013 | 54,094 words

This page relates ‘Upayas for Moksha in Advaita� of study dealing with Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita. This thesis presents a comparative analysis of two non-dualistic philosophies, Pratyabhijna from Kashmir and Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta from Kerala, highlighting their socio-cultural backgrounds and philosophical similarities..

Go directly to: Footnotes.

4.2. ⲹs for Ѵǰṣa in Advaita

Advaita Vedanta suggests three means Śṇa, Manana and 徱Բ, to be practiced by the aspirants of liberation. By following this exegetical triple method, one is believed to be realized his own self after annihilating . The practice of these methods is recommended to a qualified candidate of Advaitic studies. So Advaita ձԳٲ demands some other pre-requisites also for attaining the liberation. It is generally called as the Sādhanacatuṣṭayasampatti (achievement of four necessary tools for realization). After achieving these, one is expected to practice the above mentioned three methods.

1. Sādhanacatuṣṭaya

Sādhanacatuṣṭayasampatti is considered as the basic qualification to learn ձԳٲ and as a means for attaining the highest knowledge. The four 󲹲Բ are:

1) Discriminatory knowledge of real and unreal things

2) Renunciation of all desires to enjoy the fruits of actions here and hereafter

3) Attainment of Ś (tranquility), Dama (self control), Uparati (withdrawal of senses from their objects), վپṣ� (forbearance) Ś (faith in Vedāntic teachings) and Բ (contemplation of mind); and

4) Longing for liberation.

Śṅk has described these while commending on the word �Atha� of the first 󳾲ūٰ.[1] To a candidate having the above qualities, the teacher transmits the knowledge of Brahman.

Knowledge is the actual form of Brahman in Advaita. So the highest path or for liberation is only the acquisition of knowledge, which is the real or genuine nature. The peculiarity is that the goal and the path are the same, i.e. the knowledge.

[The following] are the Śܳپ which confirm the oneness of the goal and its means:

tato brahmavidāpnoti param,[2]

tameva 徱ٱ atimṛtyumeti nānya� panthā vidyate'yanāya,[3]

ñԲԲԻ岹� brahma[4].

The actions, which lead to bondage, are never helpful for reaching Ѵǰṣa. But good and desire-less actions help a man to purify the mind and to attain the highest goal.

2. Śṇa, Manana and 徱Բ

According to Advaita ձԳٲ the non-dual Ѵǰṣa can be attained through Śṇa, Manana and 徱Բ.[5]

The Śܳپ direct the aspirants to hear, to see, to meditate and to contemplate upon the Brahman:

ٳ ' ṣṭⲹ� śdzٲ Գٲⲹ� nididhyāsitavya� |[6]

Out of these three means, the third one 徱Բ is having the power to annihilate . With the pensive thoughts deep-seated as a stable frame of the mind (徱Բ) the object loses its diversity, which is the distinction between the character and the characterized. The other two leads to the third.[7]

Literally Śṇa is the function of ear, one of the sense organ. But in the philosophical mood Śṇa is the hearing about the non-dual reality Brahman to create attention of the mind in it. In fact it is also a mental process.[8] It stands for knowing from the mouth of teacher about Brahman as the logical conclusion and the only intention of all 貹Ծṣa. Manana is the logical thinking for knowing the ideas of non-dual Brahman already heard.[9] 󾱻Բ is defined as concentrated contemplation of the non-dual being already heard and thought. It is the continuous flow of one and the same knowledge devoid of differentiated knowledge like that of body, resulted from the inborn instincts.[10] It is considered as the straight pathway to the realized experience Ѵǰṣa.[11]

Even though the particular ideas with particular names of the means for liberation seen in ʰٲⲹñ are not seen in Advaita and vice versa, the notion of continuous contemplation of the one and the same non-dual principle is similar to both systems. It seems Sādhanacatuṣṭayasampatti and Śṇamanananidhidhyāsanas are acceptable to an extent to all Indian idealistic philosophies. There may be difference in the matter what to be heard or thought or to be contemplated according to the concept of ultimate reality in each system. Hence these are applicable to ʰٲⲹñ also. In both the ⲹs are meant for the gradual realization of the non-duality of the ultimate reality.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

saṃsārabījamañԲ� kāmakarmapraṛtپkāraṇam | ԴDZ貹Ծṣa-śṅk-ṣy, Introduction.

[2]:

Īśٲⲹñ-ṛtپ, 3.2.18.

[3]:

ayameva grāhyagrāhakabhedāvabhāsa� śabdamaya� paśubhāve saṃsārabandha� | Īśٲⲹñ-ṛtپ, 4.8.

[4]:

māyāto bhediṣu kleśakarmādikaluṣa� 貹ś� | Īśٲⲹñ-, 3.2.3.

[5]:

ātmana� māyā' | ṇḍūⲹ-śṅk-ṣy, 3.10; indriyaprajñāyā� amayatvena māyātvābhyupagamādadoṣa� | māyābhi-rindriyaprajñābhi� arūpābhirityartha� | ṇḍūⲹ-śṅk-ṣy, 3.24.

[6]:

malamajñānamicchanti saṃsārāṅkurakāraṇam | ղԳٰǰ첹, 1.23.

[7]:

śaktistirodhānakarī māyābhidhā puna� | Īśvarapratyabhijñā-, 3.1.7.

[8]:

ṣa Ի� ṃsī karmabandhana� | Īśٲⲹñ-, 3.2.2. 164

[9]:

ñԱ屹ṛt� ñԲ� tena muhyanti jantava� | 󲹲-ī, 5.15.

[10]:

bhrāmayan sarvabhūtāni yantrārūḍhāni māyayā | Bhagavad-ī, 18.61.

[11]:

saiva bhagavato māyā vimohinī śپ� | Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vimarśini, 첹ī, Part I, p. 58.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: