365bet

Bhagavatpadabhyudaya by Lakshmana Suri (study)

by Lathika M. P. | 2018 | 67,386 words

This page relates ‘Greatness of Guru and Manisha Panchakam� of the study on the Bhagavatpadabhyudaya by Lakshmana Suri: a renowned Sanskrit Scholar from the 19th century. The Bhagavatpada-abhyudaya is a Mahakavya (epic poem) narrating the life of Shankara-Acharya, a prominent teacher of Advaita Vedanta philosophy. This essay investigates the socio-spiritual conditions of 8th century AD in ancient India as reflected in Lakshmanasuri’s work.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

The Greatness of Guru and Manisha Panchakam

Śī Śṅk reached ś and preached the Advaita philosophy to everybody there. He also wrote commentary on the 󳾲ūٰ. One day, a young Brahman boy Sanandana came there with the purpose of learning Advaita philosophy from him. But Śṅk was sitting on the other side of the river and called Sanandana to come forward. He had to cross the river and Ganges was overflowing with floods. But Sanandana without any hesitation started crossing the river obeying the orders of his master. Because of such greatness of faith on his Guru when each step Sanandana took, a lotus sprouted at each foot creating a bridge of flowers for him to walk across the river. After this incident he came to be known as Padmapāda or lotus footed. He was one of the foremost disciples of Śī Śṅk and travelled with him throughout the country. This story shows the strong bond between the Guru and Śṣy in the Advaita system.

Once on the banks of river Ҳṅg a candāla with four dogs appeared before him. Śī Śṅk asked him to clear away from the path. To this Candāla replied:

annadannamayamathavā caitanyameva caitanyāt
dvijavara dūrīkartu� vāñchasi ki� brūhi gaccha gaccheti
[1]

Meaning: you are asking something to get away. What should get away from what? Is it your intention that the body made of flesh and bones etc. Which is a product of food should get away? What is your view, Oh, the best among Brahmins, please give me a reply.

Śī Śṅk was dumb struck at this question. He immeditaely realised the Lord himself had come in this form to question whether he had realised in himself what he was preaching others. Śṅk uttered a śǰ첹 in five verse called �Ѳīṣāpñ첹mwhereby he declares that whoever teaches him the oneness of Brahman, he who teaches him the concept of self realisation is fit to be his Guru irrespective of whether he is a Brahmin or a Candāla.

Ѳīṣāpñ첹 (Manisha-panchakam)

jāgratsvapnasuṣuptiṣu sphuṭatarā yā saṃvidujjṛmbhate yā brahmādipipīlikāntatanuṣu protā jagatsākṣiṇ� |
saivāha� na ca dṛśyavastviti dṛḍhaprajñā'pi yasyāsti ceccaṇḍālo'stu sa tu dvijo'stugururityeṣ� īṣ� mama |
brahmaivāhamida� jagacca 첹� cinmātravistārita� sarve caitadavidyayā triguṇayā śṣa� kalpitam |
ittha� yasya ṛḍ پ� sukhatare nitye pare nirmale caṇḍālo'stu sa tu dvijo'stu gururityeṣ� īṣ� mama ||
śaśvannaśvarameva viśvamakhila� Ծśٲⲹ ܰǰԾٲⲹ� brahma ԾԳٲ� ṛśaٲ nircyājaśāntātmanā |
ūٲ� ca ṣkṛt� pradahatā saṃvinmaye pāvake prārabdhāya 辱ٲ� svavapurityeṣ� īṣ� mama ||
yā tiryaṅnaradevatābhirahamityanta� saphuṭ� gṛhyate yadbhāsā hṛdayākṣadehaviṣayā bhānti svato'ٲ� |
tā� bhāsyai� pihitārkamaṇḍalanibhā� sphūti� 屹ⲹ Dzī nirvṛtamānaso hi gururityeṣ� īṣ� mama ||
yatsaukhyāmbudhileśaleśata� ime śakrādayo nirvṛtā yaccitte nitarā� praśāntakalane labdhvā munirnirvṛta� |
yasminnityasukhāmbudhau galitadhīrbrahmaiva na 󳾲ⲹ� kaścitsa surendravanditapado ūԲ� īṣ� mama ||
[2]

1. In the waking state, dream and sleep the consciousness clearly shines. This Chaitanya as a witness dwells in beings from an ant upto the Brahma. I am this consciousness not an objective of perception. One who knows this perception, he is my Guru irresepecive of whether he is a 䲹ṇḍ or a Brahmana. This is my firm conviction.

2. I am Brahman (consciousness). The world is a form of the consciousness. It is made of nescience. This world is an imagined one constituted by three qualities. One who deeply believes in Brahman, whether he was of 䲹ṇḍkula or Brahmanakula, no doubt He is my Guru. This is my firm conviction.

3. Hearing the advice of Guru, one who believe the world is temporary and one who burns past and future deeds in the fire of knowledge that person definitely gives his body to ‘prārabhda karmās�, He is my Guru. This is my firm conviction.

4. Which Ahamboda is situated in birds, animals, humans, Devas, which is the cause of Acetana like mind, Indriya, body, վṣaⲹ etc, and like Surya covered by cloud which consciousness is covered by �ʰٲⲹṣa padārthās� like mind senses and body. One who imagine these matters carefully and meditation on that pure consciousness no doubt He is my Guru. That is my firm conviction.

5. By a little portion of the eternal bliss of Brahman Gods like Indra are blessed. By meditating on the self a calm sage gets fulfilment. The person identified with self is not a mere knower of Brahma but he in the Brahman itself. Which a person, who ever he may be, is one whose feet are worshipped by God Indra etc. This is my firm conviction.

Śṅk’s Six schools of devotion

Śṅk defeated scholars who argued against the Advaita philosophy and established the identity of Brahman and soul.

But he also cared for the less intelligent people who lived as devotees of God.

Ծśś� 貹� ٲٳٱ� gocarīkartumakṣamā� || 4 ||
ye bhaktimanta� śraddhāḍhyā mandāsteṣvanukampayā |
ṣaṇmٲٳ󲹱貹Բ� ṛt sarvānanvagrahīdvibhu� || 5 ||
śivaviṣṇavambikābhānugaṇādhipakapāliṣu |
yatra yasya bhavetprītirdevatāyāmupāsitum || 6 ||
sa 𱹲� tā� bhajatā� śraddhābhaktipuraḥsaram |
śrutiprasiddhā� ṣaḍimā 𱹲� kāmitapradā� || 7 ||
phalābhisandhimucchinnā bhajatā� mokṣadāśca tā� |
śrutismṛticāraviruddhānyatra yāni vā || 8 ||
liṅgacakrāṅkamāṃsāsṛgucchiṣṭāsthimukhāni tu |
varjanīyānyavadyāni tāni tantroditānyapi || 9 ||
tāni pāṣaṇḍamohārthamūcurhariharādaya� |
śrutighaṇṭhāpathe mokṣamābhiniṣkrāmati sthite || 10 ||
kimartha� vā'tidurgeṇa cañcūryadhve kadadhvanā |
anuśiṣṭā� ṣaḍapyeva� bhajanta� sveṣṭadevatām || 11 |
tameva paramācāryamamanyanta ṛt󲹰 ṛt󲹰 |
ٲٲ� śrīśaṃkarācāryo jagadgururitīryate || 12 ||
[3]

The statements contradictory to Veda thought and other contradictory statements in the field of Advaita philosophy Śṅk rectified by his Advaita thought. He condemned the arguments of the Dvaitins. Later he spread his divine thoughts to every nuke and corner. The Advaita thoughts could not be grasped by common people. In order to spread these thoughts to ordinary people Śṅk made ‘Ṣaṇmatas� or six schools of devotion. They are Ś, Vaiṣnavism, Śٲ (Śٲm), Saura (Sauram), ṇa貹ٲⲹ (ṇa貹ٲⲹm), վⲹ첹 (վⲹ첹m) etc. Those who worshipped these favourite Gods with purity, detachment to results and full attention will satisfy theirdesire for liberation. Śṅk abandoned the erroneous worship of evil forces, black magic, Liṅgadharam, Cakradhāranam, ṃs-ܻ徱-ṣṭ-Asthi-Mugha etc and always promoted the purity of mind by devotion to God. This he thought, will lead eventually to the final release of the soul.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

ṣmṇa ū, 󲹲ٱ岹ܻ岹ⲹ, IV, p.52.

[2]:

H.R Bhagavat, Minor Works of Śī Śṅk峦ⲹ, p.364.

[3]:

ṣmṇa ū, 󲹲ٱ岹ܻ岹ⲹ, IX, 4-12.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: