365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

啶班ぅ啶� 啶灌ぐ啷囙い啷� 啶氞ぞ啶о�嵿さ啶班�嵿く啷佮ぐ啷嵿が啷嵿ぐ啶灌�嵿ぎ啶距そ啶оぞ啶ㄠ�� 啶� 啶掂ぞ啶溹た啶ㄠぎ啷� 啷�
啶灌�嬥い啶� 啶掂ぞ啶洁お啶� 啶灌ぐ啷囙う啶多�嵿さ啶�啷佮う啷嵿�椸ぞ啶む�� 啶氞ぞ啶�啷嵿く啶ㄠ�� 啶曕�嵿ぐ啶�啷� 啷� 啷ㄠウ啷� 啷�

ratha峁� haret c膩dhvaryurbrahm膩'dh膩ne ca v膩jinam |
hot膩 v膩'pi hareda艣vamudg膩t膩 c膩pyana岣� kraye || 209 ||

At Fire-laying, the Adhvaryu shall take the chariot, and the Brahman the horse; or the 贬辞迟峁� shall take the house: and the 鲍诲驳腻迟峁� shall take the cart at the Soma-purchase.鈥�(209)

 

Medh膩tithi鈥檚 commentary (manubh膩峁�ya):

At the rite of Fire-laying the Adhvaryu shall take the chariot; and the Brahman or the 贬辞迟峁� shall take the swift horse.

In certain rescensional texts, these form the 鈥榮acrificial fee鈥� for the rite of Fire-laying.

At, the rite of 鈥楽oma-purchase,鈥� there is a cart, which is to be taken by the 鲍诲驳腻迟峁�. To this cart one calf is yoked, and another unyoked: and it is on this cart that the purchased Soma is carried. Others hold that the rites laid down in connection with the 鈥榩urchase of Soma鈥� have some transcendental purpose, and their use does not lie only in the obtaining of the Soma; because there is no new character produced in the Soma by its being purchased in the peculiar manner prescribed.

This verse has described how the fees prescribed in connection with the subsidiary details are to be distributed among the several persons concerned; the next verse is going to describe the rule concerning the distribution of the sacrificial fee prescribed in connection with all rites in general.鈥�(209)

 

Explanatory notes by Ganganath Jha

This verse is quoted in 痴颈惫腻诲补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补 (p. 120), which adds the following notes:鈥擣or the followers of certain recensions it is laid down in connection with the fire-kindling rites that the Adhvaryu is to receive the chariot the Br膩hma峁嘺 priest a swift horse, the 鲍诲驳腻迟峁� priest, the cart in which the Soma is carried.鈥斺��Kraye鈥� means at the purchase of Soma.鈥擧ence the answer to the question raised in the preceding verse is that the special fee prescribed for a particular priest is to be given to that priest only; as it is only thus that the 鈥�giving鈥� would be done in its real sense; the mention of the priests in the texts prescribing the fees could not but be for this perceptible purpose; while in any other case such naming would have to be taken only as serving some transcendental purpose.

This verse is quoted also in 笔补谤腻艣补谤补尘腻诲丑补惫补, (Vyavah膩ra, p. 221), to the effect that it is only the general fee prescribed in connection with the performance as a whole that it is to be divided among the priests,鈥攏ot so the special fee prescribed in connection with a particular priest, who alone is to receive this latter fee;鈥攁nd in 碍峁泃测补办补濒辫补迟补谤耻 (90a), which says that this answers the question raised in the preceding verse, the answer being that wherever the texts prescribe a certain article as to be given to a particular person, it has to be given to that person only.

 

Comparative notes by various authors

痴颈峁ａ箛耻 (痴颈惫腻诲补谤补迟苍腻办补谤补, p. 120).鈥�(Same as Manu).

叠峁沨补蝉辫补迟颈 (Apar膩rka, p. 837).鈥�(Same as Manu).