Essay name: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
Author:
Lance Edward Nelson
Affiliation: McMaster University / Religious Studies
This is a study and English translation of the Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati (16th century)—one of the greatest and most vigorous exponents of Advaita after Shankara-Acharya who was also a great devotee of Krishna. The Bhaktirasayana attempts to merge non-dualist metaphysics with the ecstatic devotion of the Bhagavata Purana, by asserting that Bhakti is the highest goal of life and by arguinng that Bhakti embodies God within the devotee's mind.
Page 528 of: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
528 (of 553)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
NOTES: CHAPTER NINE 516 27 madekaÅ›araṇatÄmÄtram moká¹£asÄdhanam na karmÄ-
nuá¹£á¹hÄnam karmasamnyÄso vÄ, GAD 18.57; Pan, p. 746.
vidhiyate
28 na hy atra karmatyÄgo vidhi̇yate apitu vidyamÄne
'pi karmaṇi tatrÄnÄdareṇa bhagvadekaÅ›aranatÄmÄtraq
brahmacarigá¹›hasthavÄnaprasthabhiká¹£uṇam sadharaṇyena
sarveá¹£Äm tu Å›ÄstrÄṇÄm paramam rahasyam
IÅ›varaÅ›araṇataiveti tatraiva Å›ÄstraparisamÄptir bhagavatÄ
ká¹›ta tÄm antareṇa samnyÄsasyÄpi svaphalÄparyavasayitvÄt /
tasmÄt samnyÄsadharmesv apy anadarena
bhagavadekaÅ›araṇatÄmÄtre tätparyam bhagavataá¸�, GAD 18.66;
Pan, 753-754.
�
29. tasyaivÄham mamaivÄsau sa evÄham iti tridhÄ /
bhagavaccharaṇatvam syÄt sadhanÄbhyÄsapÄkataá¸� // viÅ›eso
varnito 'smabhi� sarve bhaktirasayane
ambarisa-
prahladagopiprabhá¹›tayaá¸� cÄsyÄm bhÅ«mikÄyÄm udahartavyaá¸�, GAD
18.66; Pan, p. 754.
30GAD
�
3.20, Pan, pp. 159-160; GAD 18.56, Pan,
pp. 744-746; GAD 18.63, Pan, pp. 749-750. See following
three notes.
3larjunam ca ká¹£atriyam samnyÄsÄnadhikÄrinam prati
saṇnyÄsopadesayogat, GAD 18.66; Pan, p. 754. See note 53.
At GAD 3.20, Madhusudana outlines the whole orthodox
argument for this position, and explicitly rejects the more
liberal interpretation of Suresvara:
"[Only Brahmins are eligible] because the saying of the
Upanisads enjoining renunciation, namely, `Brahmins,
having overcome the desire for sons, wealth, and heaven,
practice the life of mendicants' [BU 3.5.1], intends
only Brahmins, as the injunction, The king desiring
dominion should perform the rÄjasÅ«ya sacrifice,' intends
only Kṣatriyas. And the smrti declares, ‘Brahmins have
four stages of life, Kṣatriyas three, and Vaiśyas two.'
And in the PurÄnas the absence of samnyÄsa for Ká¹£atriyas
and Vaisyas is also declared: 'This dharma which bears
the mark of Viá¹£nu is for the Brahmins; it is not taught
for the Ksatriyas and the Vaisyas.' You [Arjuna], whose
body was acquired through actions that led to birth as a
Ká¹£atriya, even though you may be a knower, are qualified
only to perform action for the sake of the well-being of
the world, like Janaka and the others. You are not able
to renounce, because of not having obtained birth as a
Brahmin. This is the meaning. It was determined by the
Blessed author of the Commentary [Samkara], who knew the
intention of the Blessed Lord to be such, that samnyÄsa
is for Brahmins only, not for others. We note, however,
that the author of the Värttika [on the BU, Suresvara]
has made the merely audacious assertion that
renunciation is for Ká¹£atriyas and Vaisyas as well"
