Traces of Mysticism in Jainism (Study)
by Sadhvi Madhystha Prabha | 2021 | 103,765 words
This page relates ‘Mystical Creation in Veda� of the study on the concept of Mysticism in Jainism exploring key concepts such as Jaina metaphysics and Jain ethics. The present research is divided into six chapters, beginning with an introduction to mysticism, examining its characteristics from both Western and Eastern perspectives. Subsequent chapters delve into the mystical aspects of Brahmanic and Shramanic literature, analyzing texts from the Shvetambara and Digambara traditions to unearth traces of Jain mysticism.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
3.1. Mystical Creation in Veda
Men of all ages have questioned that who has created the world? Why and how has it been created? This has been seen in contemplation by all mystics of every time. In unitive vision, the mystic reveals the fact of creation lost in the depth of eternal. So is the mystic in a unique position to explain ‘why and how� of creation.
ṇi tradition being theistic in nature believes that God or Brahman or Universal Consciousness have created this universe. The question to ‘why and how� about creation have different answers by diverse Hindu beliefs. There is no definite theory of creation in Hinduism. We find various mythical stories about creation in the various religious texts of the hindus but for the most part, creation seems to be a mystery of God or Brahman and it is not clear ‘when and how� it took place exactly.
According to Vedas, the creation is the divine art of the Lord/ God alone know how he workout this mysterious canvas. This art is beyond comprehension; it is only when fully manifested that we become conscious of it.
Vedas mention that the God has carved on the canvas of ṛt, the primordial matter. Devoid of any name or form, devoid of all attributes, and yet having an eternal existence, with the potential material causality as it’s only characteristic.
The Veda has at several places given an indication of this creation. Very often, the Veda talks about a creation is of different type, creation is our Lord’s sacrifice, a great ۲ñ in which He is primarily involved. There are no limits of this ۲ñ; it is spread far and wide and beyond dimensions. The whole process of creation and evolution of nature from a primeval state is expressed in mythological language in the Ṛg Veda. In the Hiranyagarbha Hymn–the mighty creator is known as Hiranyagarbha, the source of golden light, the Lord of divine effulgence. It is he who created the universe.
As it is stated:
ᾱṇy� sàmvartāgre bhūtasya ٲ� patireka āsīt sa dādhāra ٳī� dyāmutemā� kasmai ⲹ haviṣ� vidhema (1) ya atmadā baladā yasya ś upāsate praśiṣa� yasya � yasya chāyāmṛta� ṛt� kasmai…�. (2) ya� prāṇato nimiṩato mahitvaika idrājā jagato babhūva ya īśe asya dvipadaścatuṣpada� kasmai…�. (3) yasyeme himavanto mahivtā�..
1. In the beginning, there existed a Lord of divine effulgence; he was the sole Lord of all created beings. He fixed and held up this earth and heaven.
2. Who by this is grandeur has become the sole reeler of all the moving world that breathes and slumbers.[1]
The ʳܰṣa ūٲ[2] of Ṛg Veda details this creation is the cosmic sacrifice of the supreme self. The Cosmic Man who has thousands of eyes, heads and feet, envelopes this whole universe. Whatever all this is, whatever has been in the past, and whatever is going to be future, all that is in fact the Cosmic Man itself. …�.From that Cosmic Man, super luminescence is born and from super luminescence again the creative factor is born. Expanding all He exceeds the earth both forward and backward. Another hymn of Ṛg Veda mentions as: In the earliest age of Nature’s creation, the manifested is born out of the non-manifested; after that the regions are born, and after them comes out the further evolved (or the upward) creation.
The Yajur Veda’s ʳܰṣa ūٲ deals with the concept of creation as that is been explained in Ṛg Veda. It mentions that this ۲ň of cosmic creation is the supreme performance of the Cosmic ʳܰṣa, who is known as ʳܰṣa.[3] He is also ʰ貹پ.[4] The following verses of Yajur Veda[5] elucidates ۲ň as �Tasmādyajn͂āt sarvahutaṛca� 峾Ծ Tam yajn͂a� bahiṛsi praukṣan ʳܰṣa� ٲ.�
From the cosmic sacrifice, in which everything has been offered as oblations, the Ṛg Veda and 峾Բ are born. The cosmic Man, who is born earliest of all is placed on the cosmic sacrificial altar.
In Atharva hymn[6] the Devata is the creator Brahman, is termed as ṣṭ (the Remnant). This Remnant Lord is described as the source and also the pralaya or the final deluge, of the entire creation. When at the deluge, everything disappears, the Creator Lord still remains, and from him, again and again, the new creations arise.[7] Another hymn of Veda goes as: Āpo vatsam janayantirgarmomagre samairayan Tasyota jāvamānasyolba āsiddhiranyavah. In the beginning, generating offspring, the waters brought an embroyo into being; and even as it sprang in life, it had a covering of gold. That God alone, and none else, shall we adore with devotion[8]. Moreover, the �Skambha ūٲ�, of Atharva Veda devotes an entire extension hymn, to the cosmic creation, and the divine laws that sustain in it the marvellous way[9]. Thus, the Vedas reveal that this manifested creation is the unique art of the unmanifested Brahman. Therefore, the entire universe is regarded as the cosmic form of the Lord. This cosmic creation was thus conjoined with cosmic worship, and “by this knowledge, men were raised to the highest sublime position of ṛṣ.�[10] The Lord is a great weaver and He insenstanlty weaves with profoundest care and skill.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
[2]:
[3]:
Yajur Veda, Mantra in Sanskrit, With English Translation and Transliteration, trans. Swami Satya Prakash Saraswati and Udaya Vir Viraj, Delhi, Vol.1-3, 2nd edition, 2011, 31.18
[4]:
Ibid, Vol.3, 31.19
[5]:
Ibid, Vol.3, 31.7,9
[6]:
Atharva Veda: Mantra in Sanskrit with English Translation and Transliteration, Translated by Swami Satya Prakash Saraswati and Udaya Vir Viraj, DAV Publication Division, Delhi, 2012, Vol.1-5, 2nd edn., 11.7
[7]:
Ibid, Vol. 3, 11.7.1
[8]:
Ibid, Vol. 2, 4.2.8
[9]:
Ibid , Vol. 3, 10.7.1-44