Essay name: Tilakamanjari of Dhanapala (study)
Author:
Shri N. M. Kansara
Affiliation: Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda / Department of Sanskrit Pali and Prakrit
This is an English study of the Tilakamanjari of Dhanapala, a Sanskrit poem written in the 11th century. Technically, the Tilaka-manjari is classified as a Gadyakavya (“prose-romance�). The author, Dhanapala was a court poet to the Paramara king Munja, who ruled the Kingdom of Malwa in ancient west-central India.
Chapter 16 - The Tilakamanjari as a Sanskrit novel
132 (of 138)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
1012
Another short-coming of Dhanapāla is his overfondness
for alliterations which at times lands him into unnecessa-
ry elaboration, a few specimens of which have been given in
chapter fifteen.
To the modern mind not fully steeped in the knowledge
of Epic and Puranic mythological stories and their great po-
pularity not only among learned few but also among the gene-
ral populace in India, Dhanapāla's occasional allusions to
mythological stories, to various tenets of popular religi-
ous and philosophical systems seem to be a prominent flaw.
But, as has been aptly put in another context by Prof. S.V.
409 Dixit,
these literary by-ways were highly appreciated in
those times as 'striking speech' (vakrokti) and one of the
essential decorations of poetry. In Dhanapala's TM they are
never recondite. As an occasionaal literary device, sparing-
ly as it is used by Dhanapāla, it provides a new source of
intellectual entertainment. And the appeal of this style as
a decorative device has not become less or out-of-date even
in modern times in contemporary English writings%; only
the subjects of allusions have changed from the classical
Epics to modern works of European languages and literature !
Dhanapāla's tendency to box stories into stories giving
rise to a great complexity of structure to plot may be rega-
rded by some as a weakness as it often confounds the reader
409. BHLL, pp.112-113.
