365bet

Essay name: Paumacariya (critical study)

Author: K. R. Chandra
Affiliation: Research institute of Prakrit, Jainology and Ahimsa Vaishali

This is a critical study of the Paumacariya: the earliest Jain version of Rama's life story, written in Prakrit by Vimalasuri dating to the 4th century AD. In this text, Rama (referred to as Padma) is depicted with lotus-like eyes and a blooming face. The Paumacariya places emphasis on the human aspects of characters rooted in Jain values, contrasting with the divine portrayal in Valmiki’s version.

Page 370 of: Paumacariya (critical study)

Page:

370 (of 671)


External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)


Download the PDF file of the original publication


Warning! Page nr. 370 has not been proofread.

SOCİAL CONDITIONS 341 Guardian's Responsibility:-The act of marriage is often denoted
by the term 'pāniggahana' (7.75;24.33;98.56). It was a symbol of
'sva-karana" which entailed the transfer of the authority of the parents
over the girl to the husband and for that the offering of the bride to
a bride-groom is indicated by the word 'dinna' (15.38). Thus the
responsibility of marriage lay with the guardians. King Mahendra
was worried for the marriage of his daughter, Añjanā (15.36). Vānara
Sugrīva was in anxiety for getting a suitable husband for his daughter
Padmarāga (19 37; See also 51.18; 36.11). In these cases the initiative
is taken by the fathers of the girls and they get success in negotiations.
Sometimes the father of a boy took initiative. Vidyadhara Puspottara
had demanded the sister of Vānara Śrīkaṇṭha for his son (6.6). In
the absence of the father, the elder brother was responsible for the
marriage of his younger ones (6.6; 9.28, 50). In the case of Lavaṇa
and Ankusa the two sons of Sītā, their guardian king Vajrajangha
arranged their marriage (98.1). In the absence of any guardian the
suitor himself made demand for a bride from her guardian (10.4-8).
Thus the PCV reveals that generally the guardians settled the marriage
of their sons and daughters. In the case of contest type of 'svayamvara'
marriage the father of the bride proposed a feat and in the selection
type too it must have depended upon the father of the bride to invite
or not a to invite a particular candidate. Further the accompanying
of the parents with the promising condidates in a 'svayaṃvara' indi-
cates that the consent or the wishes of the parents prevailed in the
‘svayaṃvara' marriage also. Kaikeyi's initiative and then Dasaratha's
consent to the marriage of their son, Bharata with Subhadra the
daughter of Kanaka, the brother of Janaka of Mithila (28.131) indicates
that generally the father and the mother both were unitedly responsible
for the marriage of their children. One thing is to be noted that
though the marriage of the children dependend on the wishes of their
parents but in no case the marriage was a failure.
Wishes of the Children :-It is true that the parents settled the
marriage of their children but the wishes of the latter ware not altoge-
ther neglected. King Mahidhara betrothed his daughter to some other
person when he lost all hopes of getting Lakṣmaṇa who was greatly
cherished by his daughter. But when Lakṣmaṇa went there per chance
Mahidhara gladly gave his consent to his daughter to marry him.
(36.9-40). Vidyādhara Candragati tried his best to accomplish the wish
of his adopted son Bhāmandala who wanted to marry Sītā (28.9-75),
1. Pradanam svāmya karaṇam'-Manu, 5.152.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: