Formal Education System in Ancient India
by Sushmita Nath | 2016 | 63,563 words
This page relates �8th century Vikramashila Mahavihara� of the study on the (formal) education system in Ancient India with reference to Vedic and Buddhist period, investiging educational institutions and universities which existed during this time. Professional educational methods were found in ancient Sanskrit literature (Brahamanas, Dharma-Shastras, Puranas, Jatakas, etc.), including rules, ceremonies and duties of pupils in ancient India.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
The 8th century վś Ѳ屹
The վś Ѳ屹 was founded by King ٳ in the eighth century A.D. It was the late contemporary of Ի վ. The name of վś had faced many debates. Different authorities have different opinion about its name. According to life of Atisa translated by Ś Candra Das, the Monastery was named վś because of the high moral character of the Monks. The Tibetan sources mention that the վ was named after a ۲ṣa called Vikrama suppressed here. But R.C.Mazumdar mentions that it was another name of ٳ who founded վś. It was known as the Royal University of վś in that period[1].
The place of վś had been variously identified by different scholars. According to one authority it was started on a hillock on the banks of the Ganga in northern Magadha (). Another authority mentioned that it was situated about three miles from Baragaon, the village named Silao, near ancient Ի and sixth miles to the north of Rajgir. But this identification of the site was uncertain. Dr. S.C. Vidyābhuṣan and S.C.Das identified the վś was located in Sultanganj in 岵ܰ district. This identification of the site was best identification. Many of the authorities support this identification[2].
King ٳ[3] constructed վś վ in a very good design. Like Ի the buildings of վś վ was also constructed in a very well planned way. The whole վ was enclosed on all sides by strong wall. There were one hundred and eight temples, six college buildings, a central hall called the House of science and free broad Hostels. There was also a large quadrangle which could accommodate an assembly of eight thousand persons. Like Ի, these colleges� buildings were so beautiful that all the outer wall of Monastery was adorned with the beautiful paintings. In its front wall was adorned with beautiful paintings of 岵ܲԲ, once the head of the Ի Monastery. The other walls of the Monastery were also adorned with the paintings of the famous teacher’s images, who earned fame for learning and character[4].
The administration of the University of վś belonged to a very high order. The administrative work of վś was under the control of Board of eminent scholars. The administrative board decided the rules and regulations of the Monastery. The different departments were under the control of this administrative board. The different eminent scholars were the members of this administrative board. These members of the board were assigned to different administrative duties like–the ordination of the novices, supply and supervision of servants, distribution of food and fuel, assignment of monastic work and many more. But it is very interesting to mention here that 峾 ٳ mentioned that, this board of վś University also administered the affairs of the Ի University. Many distinguished authorities did not accept this statement[5]. But R.K.Mookerji[6] in his book Ancient Indian Education mentions that, it was probably the time, when King ٳ being the head of both the Universities. So, the administrative boards of both the Universities were same. They were the sisters Universities. The administrative work of both Universities was controlled by one board. Like the administrative board, the academic administration of the վś University, was vested in a council of six ٷ-ʲṇḍٲ. These six ٷ-ʲṇḍٲ (Gate Keeper) were the guards of six gates of վś University[7].
During the reign of Canaka (955-983 A.D), the following eminent scholars, acting as ٱ-ʲṇḍٲ viz.:
-) 鲹첹śԳپ was placed at the East Gate.
-) 岵īśīپ of Benaras at the West Gate.
-) Naropa at the North Gate.
-) ʰ첹پ at the South Gate.
-) Ratnavajra of śī at the Central Gate.
-) Բśīٲ of Ҳḍa at the Second central Gate.
They were all the erudite scholars of վś University. These six ٷ-ʲṇḍٲ examine the candidates. So, it is not easy for the learner to enter in to the University, without the permission of the ٷ-ʲṇḍٲ. Like Ի, the students were also had to give a Pre-admission test, before they admitted to the University. The capable students satisfying the ٷ-ʲṇḍٲ, had to clear the test and take admission in վś University.
For a long period վś was regarded as the queen of educational institution. But we are very unfortunate that we do not know much about the վś University. վś was not as fortunate as Ի. But from the Tibetan scholars or from foreign pilgrims we learn something of the history of this վś University. Tibetan scholars would take վś as a model monastery. They used to come վś to learn at the feet of Indian ʲṇḍٲ. Almost for four centuries, the Tibetan scholars used to come վś for the sake of education. The Գٰ Buddhism was the main specialized subject of վś University. The other subjects like Grammar, Logic, Metaphysics and Ritualistic literature were some of the subjects also popular at the վś University. But nothing is definitely known of the curricula at վś. It may be assumed that the curricula, rules and regulations closely resembled those to Ի. But according to Tibetan scholars we further learn that in the վś University, the teachers and students engaged themselves with the task of copying manuscripts and translating books. The copying and translating works were done by the teachers. ī貹ṃk ŚīñԲ himself translated many books in native language of Tibet with the help of learned monk named īⲹṃh. Tibetan used to propogate Indian culture in their own country. ī貹ṃk ŚīñԲ was a versatile scholar of վś University composing several works on Tibetan Buddhism and translating Sanskrit works in Tibetan. Many other scholars like Āⲹ Buddha, Jnānapāda, Āⲹ Vairocana Raksita, Āⲹ Jetārī, Āⲹ 鲹ٲ첹-ŚԳپ, Āⲹ ñԲ-ī-mitra, Āⲹ Ratnavajra, and Āⲹ Vāgīśvara Kīrti also worked in Tibet and propagated education in that Himalayan country[8].
But at the end of thirteen century, Bukhtyar Khilji at the time of Muhammad Ghori destroyed the Monastery. But after this destruction, վś continued to live a long life in the history of Tibet. Some scholars like the Monk Sri Bhadra (the head of the վś University) and a few others, who escaped the general slaughter started their life and propagated education.
Footnotes and references:
[2]:
[3]:
Mazumdar, R.C.Ancient India, Motilal Banarasi Dass Publishers, Delhi 2007, P.268.
[4]:
[5]:
Bose, Phanindranath. Indian Teachers of Buddhist Universities, Theosophical Pub. House, Madras, 1923, P.35.
[6]:
Mookerji, R.K. Ancient Indian Education (Brahmanical and Buddhist), Motilal Banarasi Dass Publishers, Delhi 2011, P. 587.
[7]:
Dutta, Sukumar, Buddhist Monks and Monasteries of India: their history and their contribution to Indian culture, Motilal Banarasi Dass Publishers, Delhi, 2015, P.361.
[8]:
Altekar, A.S. Education in Ancient India, Vishal Kaushik Printer, Delhi, 2009, P.128.; Mookerji, R.K. Ancient Indian Education (Brahmanical and Buddhist), Motilal Banarasi Dass Publishers, Delhi 2011,P.589-595.