365bet娱乐

叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 is considered as an outstanding figure in the history of Indian linguistic thought. He led Grammar into philosophy proper, by making a case for 痴测腻办补谤补峁嘺 as a 诲补谤艣补苍补, a view about ultimate things, eventually about liberation. Gaurinath Sastri therefore aptly refers to his work as an "astoundingly original system of thought which to the best of my knowledge has no parallel" (Introduction, 1959, p.xxiv). 痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补 became the most extensive work in the medieval period which represented the most fruitful epoch of Indian thought. 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 was also the major architect of 厂辫丑辞峁璦 theory, which is regularly identified as the contribution of grammarians to the philosophical problem of meaning. His linguistic philosophy is to be considered as unique and singular among the linguistic thoughts in India.

Although 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 is a renowned grammarian, philosopher and author in Sanskrit literature, we have very little information about his personal life and date. There are references of many Bhs and one may find different traditions about him in different places. 叠丑补峁�峁�颈, the author of the grammatical poem 叠丑补峁�峁�颈k膩vya, was also known as 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈. There are references to another 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈, who was the ruler of Malwa, in 罢腻谤腻苍腻迟丑补's History of Buddhism. He also mentions a 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 who was intimately connected to the King and one of the nine great siddhas of the 狈腻迟丑补辫补苍迟丑墨测补 religious order. But neither the King nor the siddha is known to have been a poet (K V Sharma, Introduction, 1969, p.8). One of the traditions says that, 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 was the youngest son of a Brahmin who had four wives from four different casts and that 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 was the son of 艣奴诲谤补 wife. Another tradition says that 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 was a king, perhaps a brother of either 痴颈办谤补尘腻诲颈迟测补 or 艢奴诲谤补办补, who gave up his worldly life and became a 蝉补苍苍测腻蝉颈苍. 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈's life has been dramatized by Harihara in his 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈nirveda. In this story, 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 is portrayed as a student of Gorak峁Ｄ乶膩tha, from whom he learns Yoga and renounces the world (Coward, 1980, p.11). However, these traditions cannot be taken as evidence to fix the date of 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈. Since he had commented upon the 惭补丑腻产丑腻峁�y补 of 笔补迟补帽箩补濒颈 (150 BCE), the date of 惭补丑腻产丑腻峁�y补 can be taken as the upper limit.

His major work 痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补 is referred to by 痴腻尘补苍补 and 闯补测腻诲颈迟测补 in 碍腻艣颈办腻惫峁泃迟颈 (650 CE).

adhik峁泃ya k峁泃e granthe, (笔腻峁噄苍颈, 4.3.87). 艣颈艣耻办谤补苍诲补测补尘补蝉补产丑补诲惫补苍诲惫别苍诲谤补箩补苍补苍腻诲颈产丑颈艣肠丑补岣�, (笔腻峁噄苍颈, 4.3.88). taditi vartate. adhik峁泃ya k峁泃e granthe iti ca. dvandv膩t (dvit墨y膩samarth膩t) cha岣� pratyayo bhavati adhik峁泃ya k峁泃e granthe. 艣abd膩rtasambandh墨yam prakara峁嘺m. 痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补m." (Under 笔腻峁噄苍颈, 4.3.87-88)

Hence 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 can be placed within the limits 150 BCE-650 CE. Much of the evidence regarding his date supports him being placed nearer to the latter date. I-tsing, the Chinese traveller and a Buddhist, who studied at the Nalanda monastery in 670 CE, reported 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 died forty years earlier. If this report is accepted as authentic, 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 probably died in 630 CE. But I-tsing also reported that 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 was a contemporary of 顿丑补谤尘补辫腻濒补, who lived from 530 to 561 CE. Here it can be noted that I-tsing's opinions are self contradictory and unacceptable. More reliable evidence can be seen in the Tibetan translation of 罢谤补颈办腻濒测补 笔补谤墨办峁Ｄ� of the famous Buddhist author 顿颈峁卬腻驳补. He quotes two verses from the 厂惫辞辫补箩帽补惫峁泃迟颈 (hereafter 痴峁泃迟颈) of 痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补. This evidently says that 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 must have preceded 顿颈峁卬腻驳补, who flourished between 480-540 CE. Some autobiographical references can be seen at the end of the second 办腻峁囜笉补 of 痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补, where he mentions his teacher with great respect (2. 478-487). 笔耻峁噛补谤腻箩补, in his commentary, makes it clear that it is Vasur膩ta, the teacher of 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 (痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补, 2.481). The Tibetan translations of 顿颈峁卬腻驳补 and some works of a Jaina writer Simhas奴riga峁噄 suggest that Vasur膩ta was a Brahmin and a brother-in-law of B膩l膩ditya, a pupil of the great Buddhist scholar Vasubandhu, whose date is fixed as 400 CE (Coward, 1980, p.11).

We can collect as many references supporting the latter date limit of 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈. In 艢补迟补辫补迟丑补产谤腻丑尘补峁嘺, while commenting on the portion 'v膩gv膩 anu峁ａ弓ub, v膩co v膩 idam sarvam prabhavati' (1-3-2-16),

Harisw膩mi quotes two verses from 痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补 as follows.

v膩co v膩 ity膩di. 惫腻肠补岣� 艣abdasya sak膩艣膩t 'idam' sarvamarthaj膩ta峁� prabhavati. ata eva jagata岣� 艣abdavivartam膩hu岣�. tadyath膩-

补苍腻诲颈苍颈诲丑补苍补峁� brahma 艣补产诲补迟补迟迟惫补峁� yadak峁�aram vivartate' rthabh膩vena 辫谤补办谤颈测腻 jagato 测补迟补岣�. iti.
tath膩nyatr膩pi 艣abdavedh膩t tatk膩ryatvam arthasyoktam-na so' sti pratyayo loke ya岣� 艣膩bd膩nugam膩d峁泃e
anuviddhamiva 箩帽腻苍补峁� 蝉补谤惫补峁� 艣abdena bh膩sate. iti. " (1-3-2-16)

Harisw膩mi was evidently lived in the sixth century CE. Another important reference that historians point out is that of Kum膩rilabha峁�峁璦 who flourished in the fifth century CE. He quotes several verses of 痴腻办测补辫补诲墨测补 in his famous work 罢补苍迟谤补惫腻谤迟颈办补. In the light of all these discussions, it may be deduced that the date of 叠丑补谤迟峁沨补谤颈 can be fixed between 450 -500 CE.