365betÓéÀÖ

Essay name: The Nyaya theory of Knowledge

Author: Satischandra Chatterjee
Affiliation: University of Calcutta / Department of Philosophy

This essay studies the Nyaya theory of Knowledge and examines the contributions of the this system to Indian and Western philosophy, specifically focusing on its epistemology. Nyaya represents a realist approach, providing a critical evaluation of knowledge.

Page 228 of: The Nyaya theory of Knowledge

Page:

228 (of 404)


External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)


Download the PDF file of the original publication


Warning! Page nr. 228 has not been proofread.

CHAPTER X
EXTRAORDINARY PERCEPTION (ALAUKIKA
±Ê¸é´¡°Õ³Û´¡°­á¹¢A)
I. SÄmÄnyalaká¹£aṇa or the perception of classes
In the ancient school of the NyÄya we do not meet with
the distinction between laukika or ordinary and alaukika or
extraordinary perception. This distinction appears in the
modern Nyaya beginning with Gangeśa. In laukika or ordinary
perception there is a normal sense-contact with objects present
to sense. In alaukika perception, however, the objects are not
actually present to sense, but are conveyed to it through an
extraordinary medium. In it there is a special kind of sense-
object contact (alaukika-sannikará¹£a). Extraordinary percep-
tion is of three kinds, namely, sÄmÄnyalaká¹£aṇa, jñÄnalaká¹£aṇa
and yogaja.
SÄmÄnyalaká¹£aṇa is the perception of a whole class of
objects through the generic property (sÄmÄnya) perceived in
any individual member of that class. Thus when we perceive
something as a pot we judge it as belonging to the class of pots.
But to know that the thing belongs to the class of pots is also
to know all other pots belonging to the same class. To say that
'this is a pot' is to know, by implication, what all other pots
are. Hence in perceiving one thing as a pot we perceive all
other pots. But the other pots are not present to sense in the
same way in which one is present. How then can there be any
perception of the other pots? If there is to be any perception
of the other pots, they must be in some sort of contact (sanni-
kará¹£a) with our sense. According to the NaiyÄyikas, when we
perceive one pot we perceive the universal potness' as its
defining property. It is this perception of the universal
27-(O.P. 103)

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: