Samkhya elements in the Bhagavata-purana
by Jumli Nath | 2017 | 62,959 words
This page relates ‘Nature of Prakriti� of the English study dealing with the treatment of Samkhya elements in the Bhavata-Purana. The Puranas are a vast reservoir of Indian religious and cultural wisdom. Sankhya refers to one of the oldest and the authentic system of Indian philosophy ascribed to sage Kapila. This analytical study delves into the reflection of Samkhya philosophy within the Bhagavatapurana by researching original texts, translations, commentaries and scholarly articles.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Part 2.2 - Nature of ʰṛt
In ṃkⲹ philosophy, ʰṛt is regarded as the fundamental substance from which the universe is evolved. ʰṛt is the equilibrium state of the three ṇa viz., sattva, rajas and tamas.[1] ʰṛt is regarded as the uncaused cause, but it is the cause of all effects. It is the first and the root cause of this manifested world. ʰṛt is without beginning and without an end but she is always changing. Everything in ʰṛt is changing just like in a river, every movement the river gets a fresh body of water and the sum-total of all these bodies of water is the river, and yet the river is not a constant quality.
In the primal state, before manifestation ʰṛt exists in a balanced form. ʰṛt is regarded as the root cause of the universe. All worldly effects are latent in this uncaused cause. ʰṛt is that which existed before anything was produced, it is further the primary source of all things, the original substance out of which all things have come and into which eventually return. ʰṛt is also called primary matter (Բ) and unmanifested matter (avyakta). The unmanifested state of all effects is known as avyakta. The extremely subtle and imperceptible ʰṛt is called ԳܳԲ. Being extremely subtle in nature ʰṛt is imperceptible and which is inferred only from its effects.[2] As it is the unintelligent and unconscious principle, is known as Ჹḍa; and as the ever active unlimited power, it is also called śپ.
The synonyms of the word ʰṛt are:[3]
- śپ,
- Բ,
- avyakta,
- ٲ�,
- etc.
ʰṛt is the motive force behind the world process .
ʰṛt is called ū ʰṛt. It is stated in the ṃkⲹsūtra�
mūle mūlābhāvādaū�[4].
In the ṃkⲹ system, this fundamental or primal cause of the world is called ū ʰṛt. The rootless root is the first principle and the ultimate root of the universe. ʰṛt is the primary cause of everything, the ultimate seed from which everything emerges and the uncaused cause in which all things merge. It is the root cause of this manifested world.
In the ṃkⲹpravacanaṣy, Vijñānavikṣu says, ʰԲ is the first cause of the twenty three principles.[5] 峦貹پ Ѿś also says that primordial root matter is not a product; root matter is that which produces. It is called root (ū) because it is the source of the universe, which is an aggregate product, while it has no root.[6] Ҳḍa岹 treats ʰṛt as ū ʰṛt which is the root cause of the universe. Being the root cause of this universe itself has no root.[7] All worldly objects are latent in ʰṛt. All effects depend upon it. Again this ū ʰṛt is ṛt (changeless) since it is not the product of anything else.All material things have a cause. This world is a flow of cause and effect. But the ultimate cause of this world has no cause. It is not produced from anything else. Hence it is called ṛt.
ʰṛt is the material cause of the world which is dynamic. Its dynamism is attributed to its constituent ṇa. The ṇa are not only constituents, nor are they simply qualities but the ṇa are the very essence of ʰṛt.Prakriti is considered as homogeneous and its constituent ṇa cannot be separated. The ṇa are always changing, rendering a dynamic character to ʰṛt. Still a balance among the three ṇa is maintained in ʰṛt. The changes of the ṇa are two viz., Homogeneous transformation (svarupa 貹ṇām) and heterogeneous transformation (virupa 貹ṇām). Homogeneous changes do not affect the state of equilibrium in the ʰṛt. In this state, sattva changes into sattva, rajas into rajas and tamas into tamas. As a result, worldly objects are not produced. Heterogeneous changes involve radical interaction among the three ṇa. They disturb the state of equilibrium. This is the preliminary phase of the evolution. The important factor behind the disturbance is ʳܰṣa.
The derivative meaning of the term ʰṛt is prakaroti iti ṛt�.[8] Another derivation of ʰṛt is specified in the ṃkⲹsāra thus,
The ṃkⲹ kārikā illustrates the nature of ʰṛt. It accepts ʰṛt �
- ٰṇa (possessed of three ṇa),
- aviveki (indiscriminative),
- ṣaⲹ (object),
- 峾Բⲹ (general),
- acetana (nonintelligent),
- prasavadharmi (productive),
- ahetumat (causeless),
- nitya (eternal),
- 辱 (allpervading),
- Ծṣkⲹ (inactive),
- eka (one),
- śٲ (unsupported),
- ṅg nonmergent),
- niravayava (partless)
- svatantra (independent), and
- avyakta (unmanifest).[10]
Firstly, ʰṛt is the state of equilibrium of the three ṇa viz., sattva, rajas and tamas.[11]
In words of Anima Sengupta,
‘This state of equipose is absolutely indeterminate, undifferentiated and homogeneous and it exists only the possible source of energy of the whole world.�[12]
The three ṇa are not the attribute of ʰṛt but these three are the essential component of ʰṛt. These three components are indifference from the primal nature.
Secondly, ʰṛt possesses the nature of aviveki or non-discriminative. The ṃkⲹ philosophy opines that effects are non-different from the cause just as ʰṛt can not be distinguished from itself, so also the mahat etc.,cannot be distingushed from ʰṛt. Hence, aviveki may stand for the character of being cooperative.[13]
Thirdly, it is the object of enjoyment for all ʳܰṣas for which it is called as ṣaⲹ.[14] It is the root cause of all the twenty three principles, buddhi, ṃk etc.
Forthly, ʰṛt is 峾Բⲹ or common because it is apprehended by many ʳܰṣas.[15]
Fifthly, it is characterized by the nature of acetana or unconscious or nonintelligent. It is acetana as it is not conscious of pleasure, pain and delusion. Ҳḍa岹 says that it is unconscious as it can not experience pleasure, pain etc[16].
Sixthly, Productivity is the most important characteristic feature of ʰṛt. It is the most important criterion of the ʰṛt that it is prasavadharmi and also is always undergoing changes into various forms. Anima Sengupta remaks that nature is, no doubt, unconscious and unintelligent, still there is some inherent teleology (unconscious) in the ṇa as a result of which they produce this world.[17] In the ṃkⲹ philosophy, we haven’t found any other entity which stands as a substitute to ʰṛt.
Ҳḍa岹 also states that�
tathā prasavadhari vyaktam, Բmapi prasavadharmi.[18]
Seventhly, ʰṛt is called ahetumat because there is no parent cause of ʰṛt. It is the uncaused cause i.e., causeless. There is no other supreme entity than ʰṛt. Though ʰṛt possesses no cause, yet everything of this world always springs from a cause. One cause must have another cause and another cause must have the second cause and a third one and so on. Thus, each and every cause connects with one another. This connecting relation has no end.
All effects are underlying in the lap of ʰṛt.[19] But ʰṛt is not produced[20] .
Another important nature of ʰṛt is that ʰṛt is nitya or eternal, because it is neither produced nor destroyed.[21]
ʰṛt is all pervading i.e., 辱. ʰṛt is omnipresent. ʰṛt is unevovled, so it is not caused. That’s why, it is pervasive. It pervades all other effects. The effect is pervaded by the cause, not the cause by the effect. Mahat, ṃk etc., can not pervade ʰṛt (avyakta) because they are non-pervasive, while ʰṛt is pervasive.
ʰṛt is not mobile. In the words of Ҳḍa岹 sakriya signifies migration.[22] According to 峦貹پ Ѿś, intellect and rest leave one body where they were combined and enter into the composition of another, and this is their transition mobility[23] (sakriya).
Again oneness of ʰṛt is an important nature, there is no plurality. It is one and nothing but the equilibrium state of three ṇa. Anima Sengupta states ʰṛt as one and is nothing but the unity of the three ṇa in a state of potentiality and incoherece.[24]
śٲ is another important nature of ʰṛt. ʰṛt is called as śٲ because it is not produced, so it is independent while all worldly things are produced from it. There is nothing greater than ʰṛt in which it can be placed.[25]
ʰṛt is also characterized by the nature of possessing ṅgm or nonmergent. All manifested objects viz., mahat and the rest are mergent because at the time of dissolution all these merge in their cause i.e., ʰṛt.[26]
Again, ʰṛt is not perceived, it is beyond the senses. ʰṛt is purely subtle and indivisible. It can be inferred only from its effects. Iśvarakṛṣṇa says that nonperception of ʰṛt is due to its sublety, not its non-existence. It can be apprehended through its effects.[27]
If there is no existence of ʰṛt, it will be impossible to get this world. Theos Barnerd sumps up the concept of ʰṛt by saying,
‘B logical implication, ʰṛt (cosmic substance) is the uncaused cause, therefore, it is eternal, indestructible and all pervasive. It is formless, limitless, immobile and immanent. It has position but no magnitude, its centre is everywhere, and its circumstances are no where. It is an ultimate and not a derivate principle, it is the root principle, the seat of all manifestation, the normal cause of the phenomenal world, the potential of power becoming, the instrumental cause of the world, the substance in which all attributes and action inherent. It is not produced, it brings everything else into existence, it is the support of all things, yet it is unsupported, it absorbes all things, yet it is not absorbed by anything alse�.[28]
Footnotes and references:
[4]:
ṃkⲹsūtra , 1.67
[6]:
[7]:
ū� ca sāprakṛtiśca ūprakṛtirviṛt�/ Ҳḍa岹ṣy on it.
[8]:
ṃkⲹtattva-첹ܻܳī on ṃkⲹkārikā , 3
[9]:
Sa S., 3;
rd chap, P.11
[10]:
[11]:
sattva rajastamasā� sāmyāvasthā ṛt�/ ṃkⲹsūtra , 1.61
[12]:
Sengupta, Dr. Anima, Classical ṃkⲹ: A critical Study, p.88
[13]:
aviveki yathā Բ� na svato vivicyate…� tadātmakatvāt, athavā sambhūyakārita’trāvivekitā/ṃkⲹtattva-첹ܻܳī on ṃkⲹkārikā , 2
[14]:
sarvapuruṣaṣaⲹbhūtatvād ṣaⲹ iti/ Ҳḍa岹ṣy on ṃkⲹkārikā , 11.
[16]:
Բmapi sukhaduḥkhamohān na cetayati/Ҳḍa岹ṣy on ṃkⲹkārikā ,11
[17]:
Sengupta, Dr. Anima, Classical ṃkⲹ: A critical Study, p. 90-91
[18]:
Ҳḍa岹ṣy on ṃkⲹkārikā , 11
[21]:
nityamavyaktamanutpadyatvāt, Ҳḍa岹ṣy on ṃkⲹkārikā ,10.
[22]:
[23]:
ṃkⲹtattva-첹ܻܳī on Ibid.
[24]:
Sengupta, Dr. Anima, Classical ṃkⲹ: A critical Study, p. 89.
[26]:
ṅgmaⲹٲ�, nityatvāt, mahadādiliṅga� pralayakāle paras貹� pralīyate, naiva� Բ�, tasmādṅg� Բm/ Ҳḍa岹ṣy on ṃkⲹkārikā , 10.
[27]:
ṃkⲹkārikā , 8
[28]:
Barnerd, Theos, Hindu Philosophy, p. 73-74