Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita (comparative study)
by Ranjni M. | 2013 | 54,094 words
This page relates ‘Maya in Advaita� of study dealing with Pratyabhijna and Shankara’s Advaita. This thesis presents a comparative analysis of two non-dualistic philosophies, Pratyabhijna from Kashmir and Shankara’s Advaita Vedanta from Kerala, highlighting their socio-cultural backgrounds and philosophical similarities..
Go directly to: Footnotes.
6. in Advaita
The doctrine of is one of the key concepts of Advaita ձԳٲ propounded by Śṅk. As in ʰٲⲹñ, in Advaita also is narrated as the power of the ultimate reality.[1] In ūٰṣy, it is called Avyaktā Bījaśakti, without which the Supreme Lord cannot create the universe.[2] Here is illustrated as an indeterminate principle, which is non-different from the Brahman.[3] It is also considered as ignorance and as the great sleep, in which all worldly beings are immersed without recognizing their own self.[4] In վ첹ū峾ṇi, Śṅk gives a clear definition of illustrating all its features. Here also is described as the power of the Supreme Lord which is called as Avyakta (indeterminate). , which is beginning-less nescience having three constituents (ҳṇa), is the origin of the universe. It is neither real nor unreal nor both; neither different nor non-different not both; neither having limbs nor lacking limbs nor both. It is indefinable and so miraculous.
It cannot be perceived through senses, but can only be inferred from its effects by intelligent people:
avyaktnāmnī parameśaśakti� anādyavidyā triguṇātmikā 貹 |
kāryānumeyā sudhiyaiva yayā jagatsarvamida� prasūyate ||
sannāpyasannāpyubhayātmikā no bhinnāpyabhinnāpyubhayātmikā no |
sāṅgāpyanaṅgāpyubhayātmikā no mahādbhutānirvacanīyarūpā || [5]
In ʰśԴDZ貹Ծṣy is illustrated as some sort of false deportment by which a man appears outwardly in one manner and acts in another:
Like ʰٲⲹñ, Śṅk’s Advaita also consider as a Ѵdzī, the fascinating principle of the Lord, by which He Himself becomes as if fascinated:
Following the Vedic sages, who were the seekers of the ultimate reality, Śṅk also viewed the mystic principle as the cause of the mystery of the world. This fact is already dealt with due importance in almost all 貹Ծṣa. ṻDZ貹Ծṣa says thus:
峾Գٲ ٲ� ⲹ� ī� paṇḍitammanyamānā� |
dandramyamāṇāḥ pariyanti mūḍhā� andhenaiva nīyamānā� yathāndhā� || [8]
Like 貹Ծṣa, 岵ī also illustrated frequently. While explaining the Upaniṣadic passages and ī Śṅk had developed these ideas and connected to his non-dualism. It is said that the Śāṅkarabhaṣya is not a commentary in the usual sense of the word.[9] � Its primary aim is to elucidate a text (although it may do this with considerable thoroughness), but rather to construct a philosophy on the basis of the authoritative text selected.�[10] His philosophy, which perceives unity in diversity, has included a tenet known as , which has a power for exhibiting diversity in unity. As a cosmological principle relates with cosmos. As an epistemological principle it obscures the knowledge of Brahman and connects more with the multitude of the universe. As a metaphysical principle it divides the ultimate non-duality into duality.[11]
In Advaita is being used in different names like ñԲ, Ѿٳ, , , Avyakta, Jagat etc. in various contexts. At the same time it constitutes a status of doctrine (theory) which works in different levels, viz. real (ٳ첹), phenomenal (Prātibhāsika) and conventional or empirical (ղ屹첹). Considering the ٳ첹-satya, is not a power of Brahman, but merely an illusion based on ignorance. It doesn’t create the world, but the world is only an imagination or mental conception like the snake imposed on a rope.[12] Even though it seems contradictory to the earlier statements, it is also suited to the indeterminateness of . Śṅk accepts this to maintain the non-duality of the Supreme Being. Thus the principle of became an indivisible component of the system. Paul David Devanandan rightly remarks thus, “The philosophic exposition of this mystery of the world, of life, of its essential undemonstrable, unspeakable and indefinite nature is the doctrine of in Advaita ձԳٲ.�[13]
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
[3]:
[4]:
Īśٲⲹñ-, 1.5.7.
[5]:
Īśٲⲹñ-, 1.4.2.
[6]:
[7]:
ata eva vedyaikībhāvalakṣaṇapūrṇatāmayāt svātantryāt �. | Īśvarapratyabhijñā-ṛtپ, 1.5.16.
[8]:
pūrṇamada� pūrṇamida� pūrṇātpūrṇamudacyate | pūrṇasya pūrṇamādāya pūrṇamevāvaśiṣyate || Īśāvāsyopaniṣad, Śāntipāṭha; ṛhṇy-貹Ծṣa, 5.1.
[9]:
BUSB, 5.1.
[11]:
پ� pratyavamarśātmā 貹 vāksvarasoditā | svātantryametanmukhya� tadaiśvarya� paramātmana� || Īśٲⲹñ-, 1.5.13.
[12]:
ṻDZ貹Ծṣa, 2.18.