365bet娱乐

Sa峁単墨ta谤补迟苍腻办补谤补 (1250 C.E.) of 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 is one of the most important works in Classical Music literature. Interestingly, there are only two references to Kohala, one while listing out the 辫奴谤惫腻肠腻谤测补蝉 and another while describing nine types of breathing techniques (ref. para 2.2.7). 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 cites nine types of breathing techniques as mentioned by Kohala namely svastha, cala, 辫谤补惫峁沝诲丑补, nirasta, 耻濒濒腻蝉颈迟补, vimukta, vismita, skhalita and 辫谤补蝉峁泃补. These breathing techniques are found almost verbatim (with a few variations) in 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补 of A艣okamalla. Also, both the commentaries on 厂补峁僩墨迟补-谤补迟苍腻办补谤补 i.e. 碍补濒腻苍颈诲丑颈 of Kallin膩tha and 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉耻诲丑腻办补谤补 of Si峁僪abh奴p膩la bear references to Kohala, which are being taken up later.

艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补鈥檚 single reference to Kohala is regarding breathing techniques. He is also the first to make such a reference. No author prior to 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 has mentioned Kohala name in this context. Some post-艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 authors have mentioned the same types of breathing techniques, notably A艣okamalla, the author of 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补. It is strange that every important treatise on 蝉补峁単墨迟补 or 苍腻峁瓂补 has a different account of Kohala. Also, 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 has frequently referred to 础产丑颈苍补惫补产丑补谤补迟墨 in his work and was perhaps one author who had this work in his posession. It is strange that when Abhinava quotes Kohala on so many subjects, 艢ar峁単adeva does not mention any of those but gives a new reference altogether. If Abhinava was not his source who else was? Or is it possible that 艢腻谤峁単补诲别惫补 had an entirely different work of Kohala in his possession?