365bet娱乐

[Post-Dhvani Theory of Sanskrit Poetics (9): 颁颈迟谤补尘墨尘腻峁僺腻, 碍耻惫补濒补测腻苍补苍诲补 and 痴峁泃迟补惫腻谤迟颈办补 of 础辫辫补测补诲墨办峁�i迟补 (16th century A.D.)]

South Indian polymath 础辫辫补测补诲墨办峁Ｄ玹补 was a great writer on Sanskrit literary criticism and philosophy. However he is known to have written hundred books^[1], but his three contributions of Indian poetics are鈥�痴峁泃迟补惫腻谤迟颈办补, 碍耻惫补濒补测腻苍补苍诲补 and 颁颈迟谤补尘墨尘腻峁僺腻. In the 痴峁泃迟补惫腻谤迟颈办补 he has discusses about the word and meaning. The 碍耻惫补濒补测腻苍补苍诲补 is the elementary work on 础濒补峁僰腻谤补艣腻蝉迟谤补 which is dealt with various 础濒补峁僰腻谤补蝉 and in the history of Sanskrit poetics 碍耻惫补濒补测腻苍补苍诲补 is the only work where largest number of 础濒补峁僰腻谤补蝉 (poetic figures) have been treated. It have seems that it is based on the 闯辞测诲别惫补鈥檚 颁补苍诲谤腻濒辞办补, where he profusely borrowed from the latter. The famous incomplete work 颁颈迟谤补尘墨尘腻峁僺腻 discusses about the division of 办腻惫测补 (poetry) with the treatment of few figures of speech.

Following the footsteps of 顿丑惫补苍颈办腻谤补 膧苍补苍诲补惫补谤诲丑补苍补, Appayadik峁Ｄ玹a classified 办腻惫测补 (poetry) into three types鈥�Dhvani 办腻惫测补, Gun墨bh奴tavya峁単ya 办腻惫测补 and Citra 办腻惫测补, then he enunciates definitions of each of them. In the view of Dhvani办腻惫测补, 础辫辫补测补诲墨办峁�i迟补 stated the suggested excels.

From the study of 础辫辫补测诲墨办峁�i迟补鈥檚 three poetical works we found on noteworthy feature that from the standpoint of originality they have little merit. But there he has given the elaborate treatment of the largest number of poetic figures and tried to gives some new lights of thought on some vexed problem of Sanskrit poetics. Lastly we can say that his all poetical works are elementary text-books where he integrated in a systematic manner the speculation of his ancient Sanskrit poeticians.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

Gupta, D. K. A critical study of 顿补峁囜笉颈苍 and his works, 1969, Pp-25, 38