365bet娱乐

As in the case of native place, even with regard to 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍's date scholars have proposed their findings based on some evidences. These are surveyed for arriving at an approximate date of the author:

According to Prof. Mm. 驰耻诲丑颈峁ａ弓丑颈谤补 M墨m膩峁僺ak:

(a) The following points are presented by Prof. Mm. 驰耻诲丑颈峁ａ弓丑颈谤补 M墨m膩峁僺ak in arriving at the date of 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍鈥�

(i) The mention of a grammarian 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 in 搁腻箩补迟补谤补峁単颈峁嚹� of 碍补濒丑补峁嘺 who was invited specially by King 闯补测腻辫墨岣峚 to revive the study of 惭补丑腻产丑腻峁�y补 which had decayed (IV. 488-89):

de艣膩ntar膩d膩gamayy膩tha vy膩cak峁Ｄ佱箛膩n k峁�m膩pati岣� |
pr膩vartayad vicchinna峁� 尘补丑腻产丑腻峁�y补峁� svama峁囜笉ale ||
k峁Ｄ玶膩bhidh膩n膩cchabdavidyop膩dhy膩y膩t sambh峁泃a艣ruta岣� |
产耻诲丑补颈岣� saha yayau 惫峁沝诲丑颈峁� sa jay膩p墨岣峚pa峁囜笉ita岣� ||

The reign of 闯补测腻辫墨岣峚 is fixed between 751-782 A.D.

Prof. 驰耻诲丑颈峁ａ弓丑颈谤补 M墨m膩峁僺ak considers 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 the author of 础尘补谤补办辞艣辞诲驳丑腻峁璦苍补, as different from the one referred to by 碍补濒丑补峁嘺.

(ii) It is evident in both the works of 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 namely 碍峁Ｄ玶补迟补谤补峁単颈峁嚹� and 础尘补谤补办辞艣辞诲驳丑腻峁璦苍补, that he has expressly quoted from works of Bhoja. Bhoja is assigned to 1018-1053 A.D.

(iii) 痴补谤诲丑补尘腻苍补 in his 骋补峁嘺谤补迟苍补尘补丑辞诲补诲丑颈 (1110 A.D.) cites 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 in two instances:鈥�

(a) IV. 303; p. 183鈥�
jyot墨峁冡梗i grahanak峁�atr膩d墨ni vetti 箩测辞迟颈峁�i办补 iti v膩manak峁Ｄ玶asv膩minau |

Avariant reading of the same reads鈥�

jyot墨峁冡梗i grah膩d墨nadhi办峁泃ya 办峁泃o grantho jyauti峁�a岣� jyauti峁�a峁� veda jyauti峁�aka岣� |

This variant reading is found to tally with the reading in 础尘补谤补办辞艣辞诲驳丑腻峁璦苍补 (II. 8. 14; p. 179);

(b) VII. 430; p. 238鈥�
办峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍腻 尘腻峁�a 尘腻谤颈峁�a ityapi yath膩 par峁�at pari峁�aditi 峁�墨k膩y膩峁� viv峁泃am |

Avariant reading of the same 谤别补诲蝉鈥�

mar峁�a峁嚹乼 sahan膩t mari峁�a岣� | m膩r峁�o'pi | yath膩 pari峁�at |

Even in this case the variant reading agrees with the reading in 础尘补谤补办辞艣辞诲驳丑腻峁璦苍补 (I. 6. 14; p. 51).

(iv) Hemacandra (1088-1172 A.D.) in his autocommentary on 贬补颈尘腻产丑颈诲腻苍补 cites 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 by name in the following instances鈥�

(a) III. 541, p. 350鈥�
k峁Ｄ玶asv膩m墨 tu - k膩峁ａ弓hamupalak峁�a峁嘺m k膩峁ａ弓h膩艣m膩dimay墨 jaladh膩ri峁嚹� 诲谤辞峁嚹� iti vy膩cakhyau |

This agrees with the reading in 础尘补谤补办辞艣辞诲驳丑腻峁璦苍补 (I. 9. 11; p. 63); (b) IV. 211, p. 461鈥�

丑颈迟补箩补濒腻辫补产丑谤补峁兣沘 丑颈箩箩补濒补岣� iti k峁Ｄ玶asv膩m墨 |

This agrees with the reading in 础尘补谤补办辞艣辞诲驳丑腻峁璦苍补 (II. 4. 61; p. 96). These citations prove that 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 preceeded Hemacandra.

(v) The colophon at the end of 碍峁Ｄ玶补迟补谤补峁単颈峁嚹� 谤别补诲蝉鈥�

ka艣m墨rabhuvama峁囜笉ala峁� jayasi峁僪an膩mni vi艣vambhar膩pariv峁涐笉he d峁涐笉had墨rghador峁ａ箛i |
艣膩satyam膩tyas奴nurim膩峁� lilekha bhakty膩 svaya峁� dravi峁嘺v膩napi dh膩tup膩峁環am ||

It is taken to mean that the son of a minister of 闯补测补蝉颈峁僪补 had transcribed the work of 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 The date of the above mentioned 闯补测补蝉颈峁僪补 is 1128-1138 A.D.

(vi) Maitreyarak峁�ita (1083-1108 A.D.) in his 顿丑腻迟耻辫谤补诲墨辫补 cites the view of 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 through words like kecit, eke, apare, etc. , in seven instances which prove 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍's precedence to Maitreyarak峁�ita.

(vii) 鲍惫补峁璦 in his commentary on Yajurveda mentions that he wrote the work during the reign of Bhoja鈥�

峁涐梗y膩d墨峁兣沜a namas办峁泃ya 膩vany膩muvva峁璷 vasan |
尘补苍迟谤腻峁嚹佱箖 办峁泃补惫腻苍 产丑腻峁�y补峁� 尘补丑墨峁� bhoje pra艣膩sati |

鲍惫补峁璦 also cites (when commenting on yaj 25/8) 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍's statement on 础尘补谤补办辞艣补 (II. 6. 5; p. 135)鈥�

h峁沝ayasya dak峁�i峁噀 测补办峁泃 kloma 惫腻尘别 辫濒墨丑腻 辫耻辫辫丑耻蝉补艣肠别迟颈 惫补颈诲测补岣� iti k峁Ｄ玶asv膩m墨 |

As mentioned earlier, 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 cites Bhoja in both his works; he, in turn, is cited by 鲍惫补峁璦.

From all these evidences Prof. 驰耻诲丑颈峁ａ弓丑颈谤补 M墨m膩峁僺ak comes to the conclusion that 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 should have lived before 1053 A.D. the extreme limit of Bhoja's date.

According to Prof. C. Vogel:

(b) Prof. C. Vogel in Indian Lexicography has deduced the date of 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 to be about early 12th C. A.D. He suggests this date since 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 cites Bhoja and is cited by 痴补谤诲丑补尘腻苍补 in his 骋补峁嘺谤补迟苍补尘补丑辞诲补诲丑颈. Vogel agrees with Bh膩nuji 顿墨办峁�i迟补 Leibech who interprets the colophon at the end of 碍峁Ｄ玶补迟补谤补峁単颈峁嚹� mentioned above, to have been copied by 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 himself during the reign of King 闯补测补蝉颈峁僪补 of Kashmir (1128-49 A.D.) under whom 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍's father was a minister. Further, Vogel differs from 驰耻诲丑颈峁ａ弓丑颈谤补 M墨m膩峁僺ak who has also mentioned that 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 is anonymously referred to by Maitreyarak峁�ita in his 顿丑腻迟耻辫谤补诲墨辫补 whose date according to M墨m膩峁僺ak is about 1108 A.D.

According to Prof. Borooah

(c) Prof. Borooah opines that the date of 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 can easily be arrived at as 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 cites Bhoja and is himself quoted by 痴补谤诲丑补尘腻苍补 (骋补峁嘺谤补迟苍补尘补丑辞诲补诲丑颈 dated 1140 C. A.D). Also he opines that Hemacandra, early 13th C. A.D. is indebted to 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 as he quotes the latter on some occasions; thus 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 must be earlier to Hemacandra and should have flourished before the 12th C. A.D.

According to Dr. Mahesh Raj Pant

(d) Dr. Mahesh Raj Pant asserts that 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 was a contemporary of Bhoja, based on the following internal and external evidences:

(i) 鲍惫补峁璦's citation of 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 in his commentary on V膩jasaney墨 sa峁僪it膩 and his mention that he composed his works during the reign of Bhoja implies that 鲍惫补峁璦 was a contemporary of Bhoja. This Bhoja, Dr. Pant emphasises was the ruler of 笔补谤补尘腻谤补 dynasty of 惭腻濒补惫补, who reigned from 1000-1055 A.D. 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 citing Bhoja in both his works 础尘补谤补办辞艣辞诲驳丑腻峁璦苍补 and 碍峁Ｄ玶补迟补谤补峁単颈峁嚹� and 鲍惫补峁璦 citing 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 confirm the fact that 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 was a contemporary of Bhoja.

(ii) Dr. Pant also mentions that the interpretation of the colophon made by Vogel and Liebich is to be examined. Dr. Pant clarifies that the use of verb 鈥�likh鈥� clearly suggests that the work was copied by the scribe with devotion; for Dr.Pant remarks that if it were the words of the author himself then the verbs employed would be 鈥�办峁�鈥� or 鈥�rac鈥�. Considering all the above facts, the main features that come to the fore are鈥攖he extensive and reverential references to Bhoja, familiarity with central India, 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 citing 驳补耻岣峚 (闯腻迟补谤奴辫补) and 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 being cited by 鲍惫补峁璦; from all these, the conclusion arrived at is that 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 was a contemporary of Bhoja. Thus, 碍峁Ｄ玶补蝉惫腻尘颈苍 belongs to early half of 11th C.A.D.