Essay name: Kavyalankara-sara-sangraha of Udbhata
Author: Narayana Daso Banhatti
This is the Sanskrit edition Kavyalankara Sara Sangraha, including the Laghuvritti commentary of Induraja, an English introduction, notes and appendices. The 鈥淜avyalamkara Sara Samgraha鈥� by Udbhata is a significant work in the field of Sanskrit poetics, primarily focusing on poetic figures and rhetoric (alamkara). It dates back to the late 8th century.
Preface
256 (of 361)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
124
碍腻惫测腻濒补苍办腻谤补-蝉补谤补-蝉补苍驳谤补丑补.
unintelligible. It amounts to what Indur膩ja has given
as his explanation. It seems better to take in the
ordinary sense viz. 'action'. This word should include
under it 啶椸啶� [驳耻峁嘺 ] and 啶︵啶班さ啷嵿く [dravya ] by 啶侧啷嵿し啶｀ぞ. [濒补办峁峁嚹�. ] The expanded definition will
then become- 啶椸啶｀じ啷嵿く 啶掂ぞ 啶曕啶班た啶ぞ啶ぞ 啶掂ぞ ( 啶︵啶班さ啷嵿く啶膏啶� 啶掂ぞ ) 啶掂た啶班啶︵啶� - 啶呧え啷嵿く - ( 啶椸啶� - 啶︵啶班さ啷嵿く )
-啶曕啶班た啶ぞ - 啶掂啶� 啶む 啶掂た啶班啶о 啶掂た啶︵啶� [驳耻峁嘺sya v膩 kriy膩y膩 v膩 ( dravyasya v膩 ) viruddha - anya - ( 驳耻峁嘺 - dravya )
-kriy膩 - vaca岣� ta峁� virodha峁� vidu岣� ] etc, which is quite correct, intelligible
and suitable to the example given.
10-::
...
P. 64, L. 10 - 啶さ啶む啶ぞ啶� 啶曕啶曕ぞ啶ぎ啶距啶距ぐ啶� 啷� [产丑补惫补迟测腻岣� kk膩yam膩k膩ra岣� | ] In this example
the two opposite 啶椸啶� [驳耻峁嘺] s viz. 啶曕啶げ啶むぞ [办辞尘补濒补迟腻 ] and 啶むお啶� 啶ぞ啶熰さ [tapa岣� p膩峁璦va ] reside in the
same person (啶ぞ啶班啶掂い啷�) [辫腻谤惫补迟墨) ] at the same time.
Bhamaha's definition of fis
Bt M
啶椸啶｀じ啷嵿く 啶掂ぞ 啶曕啶班た啶ぞ啶ぞ 啶掂ぞ 啶掂た啶班啶︵啶оぞ啶ㄠ啶啷嵿ぐ啶苦く啶距さ啶氞 啷�
啶ぞ 啶掂た啶多啶粪ぞ啶た啶оぞ啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶掂た啶班啶о 啶む 啶掂た啶︵啶班啶啶оぞ啶� 啷�
啶ぞ啶す啶距げ啶傕啶距ぐ - 啷�.啷ㄠオ.
[驳耻峁嘺sya v膩 kriy膩y膩 v膩 viruddh膩nyakriy膩vaca岣� |
y膩 vi艣e峁Ｄ乥hidh膩n膩ya virodha峁� ta峁� vidurbudh膩岣� ||
bh膩mah膩la峁僰膩ra - 3.24.
] Rudrata's definition very clearly confirms the interpreta-
tion of 啶掂た啶班啶︵啶оぞ啶ㄠ啶啷嵿ぐ啶苦く啶距さ啶氞 ( [viruddh膩nyakriy膩vaca岣� ( ] K膩rika 57) that we have offered above.
He has :-
啶じ啷嵿ぎ啶苦え啷嵿う啷嵿ぐ啶掂啶ぞ啶︵啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶ぐ啶膏啶ぐ啶� 啶膏ぐ啷嵿さ啶ムぞ 啶掂た啶班啶︵啶оぞ啶ㄠぞ啶 啷�
啶忇啶む啶班ぞ啶掂じ啷嵿ぅ啶距え啶� 啶膏ぎ啶曕ぞ啶侧 啶さ啶むた 啶� 啶掂た啶班啶о 啷�
[yasmindravy膩d墨n膩峁� paraspara峁� sarvath膩 viruddh膩n膩m |
ekatr膩vasth膩na峁� samak膩la峁� bhavati sa virodha岣� ||
] 0 啶曕ぞ啶掂啶ぞ啶侧啶曕ぞ啶� - 啷�.啷┼ウ.
啶︵啶班さ啷嵿く啶距う啷�啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶︵啶班さ啷嵿く啶椸啶｀啶距い啶苦啷嵿ぐ啶苦く啶距ぃ啶距ぎ啷� [k膩vy膩la峁僰膩ra - 9.30.
dravy膩d墨n膩峁� dravya驳耻峁嘺j膩tikriy膩峁嚹乵 ] In the above example the two
opposite 啶椸啶� [驳耻峁嘺] s viz. 啶曕啶げ啶むぞ [办辞尘补濒补迟腻 ] and 啶むお啶冟お啶距啶� [迟补辫补岣腻峁璦惫补 ] reside in the same
thing (啶ぞ啶班啶掂い啷�) [辫腻谤惫补迟墨) ] at the same time.
All these writers, of course, have no idea about the
real nature of fat such as is defined by Mammata, viz.
啶掂た啶班啶о 啶膏啶洁さ啶苦ぐ啷嬥ぇ啷囙そ啶た 啶掂た啶班啶︵啶оい啷嵿さ啷囙え 啶う啷嵿さ啶氞. [virodha岣� so'virodhe'pi viruddhatvena yadvaca岣�. ] They are not at all aware of the
notion that the f (contradiction) between things should
not be real but an apparent one. Real contradiction accord-
ing to Mamma峁璦 is a fault in poetry. Hence it should
not exist at all. Thus all the examples of the authors
like Bh膩maha, Udbhata and others do not fall under
Mammata's 啶掂た啶班啶�. [virodha. ] The present example of Udbhata -啶さ啶む啶ぞ啶�
啶曕啶掂ぞ啶ぎ啶距啶距ぐ啶� 啶曕啶︵ 啶むお啶膏た 啶ぞ啶熰さ啶 [产丑补惫补迟测腻岣�
kv膩yam膩k膩ra岣� keda峁� tapasi p膩峁璦vam ] is an example of 啶掂た啶粪ぎ啶距げ啶傕啶距ぐ ( [vi峁m膩la峁僰膩ra (] first
variety ) according to Mammata, 啶曕啶苦う啷嵿く啶︵い啶苦さ啷堗ぇ啶班啶啶ぞ啶� 啶多啶侧啶粪 啶樴啶ㄠぞ-
啶た啶ぞ啶む - 啶曕ぞ. 啶啶�. 啷оウ. [kacidyadativaidharmy膩na 艣le峁 gha峁璦n膩-
miy膩t - k膩. pra. 10. ] p. 719.
Vamana in his 啶曕ぞ啶掂啶ぞ啶侧啶曕ぞ啶班じ啷傕い啷嵿ぐ [办腻惫测腻濒补峁僰腻谤补蝉奴迟谤补 ] gives the definition of 啶掂た啶班啶�
[virodha
] according to Mammata's standpoint. He has 啶掂た啶班啶︵啶оぞ啶ぞ啶膏い啷嵿さ啶�
[惫颈谤耻诲诲丑腻产丑腻蝉补迟惫补峁�
]
