Essay name: Kavyalankara-sara-sangraha of Udbhata
Author: Narayana Daso Banhatti
This is the Sanskrit edition Kavyalankara Sara Sangraha, including the Laghuvritti commentary of Induraja, an English introduction, notes and appendices. The 鈥淜avyalamkara Sara Samgraha鈥� by Udbhata is a significant work in the field of Sanskrit poetics, primarily focusing on poetic figures and rhetoric (alamkara). It dates back to the late 8th century.
Preface
186 (of 361)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
54
Kavyalankara-sara-sangraha.
the author says 啶ㄠた啶粪啶о啶ㄠ啶� [苍颈峁诲丑别苍别惫补 ] etc. The 啶掂た啶掂啶むた啶曕ぞ啶� [惫颈惫峁泃颈办腻谤补 ] introduces the
碍腻谤颈办腻 啶ㄠた啶粪啶о啶ㄠ啶� [苍颈峁诲丑别苍别惫补] 鈥� thus : 啶ㄠえ啷� 啶氞啶粪啶熰ぎ啶苦啷嵿啶距啶班啶� 啶むい啷嵿啶︵ぞ啶氞た啶ㄠ啶ㄠ啶掂啶氞啶啶� 啷� 啶むう啷嵿さ啶曕啶粪啶ぎ啶距ぃ啷嬥啷嵿い-
啶掂た啶粪く啶むく啶� 啶︵啶掂啶掂た啶о啶ぎ啶苦い啷嵿く啶距す - 啶ㄠた啶粪啶о啶ㄠ啶� 啷�.
[nanu ce峁ａ弓amicch膩karma tatkad膩cinnaivocyeta | tadvak峁am膩峁噊kta-
vi峁yatay膩 dvaividhyamity膩ha - ni峁dhenaiva 0.
] P. 32,L. 3- ......(碍腻谤颈办腻 26 b) 1- 啶掂た啶о啶じ啷嵿く
啶ㄠた啶粪啶о啶ㄠ啶� 啶むう啷� (-啶嗋啷嵿し啷囙お) 啶え啷嵿ぇ啶� 啷� [vidheyasya
苍颈峁诲丑别苍别惫补 tad (-腻办峁辫补) bandha岣� | ] " Aksepa is made up by the appa鈥�
rent negation of the thing to be asserted,"
The chief point is that the word is used here.
instead of . In the first definition it was the negation of
啶掂啷嵿い啷佮ぎ啶苦し啷嵿 [惫补办迟耻尘颈峁ａ弓补 ] and here it is the negation of the actual 啶掂た啶о啶�. [vidheya. ] Com-
bining these two definitions Indur膩ja says - 啶掂た啶оぞ啶ㄠ啶班啶い啶距う啷嵿さ啶距ぐ啷囙ぃ啷堗さ啶距い啷嵿ぐ
啶囙し啷嵿啶む啶掂ぎ啶掂じ啷�啶い啷� 啶ㄠた啶え啷嵿ぇ啶ㄠぞ啶ㄠ啶むぐ啶距き啶距さ啶距い啷� 啶囙し啷嵿啶む啶� [惫颈诲丑腻苍补办补谤尘补迟腻诲惫腻谤别峁嘺颈惫腻迟谤补
i峁ａ弓atvamavas墨yate nibandhan膩ntar膩bh膩v膩t i峁ａ弓atva ] can only be known in a
sentence by the fact that a thing is being asserted (lit.
being made the object of the action of ass, for there
is no other clue to know it. Thus when a thing desired
to be
asserted () is actually expressed (either verbally
or
by implication) then the apparent negation of it is
called 啶嗋啷嵿し啷囙お.
[腻办峁辫补.
] P. 32, LL. 6-11-啶掂た啶оぞ啶ㄠ啶班啶い啶� 啶夃啷嵿い啶掂た啶粪く啶むぞ 啶嗋啷嵿し啷囙お啶膏啶� 啷� 啶掂た啶оぞ啶�-
[vidh膩nakarmat膩 uktavi峁yat膩 腻办峁辫补sya | vidh膩na-
] that which is asserted, an assertion. An assertion is
of two kinds: (1) implied and (2) verbal. When the faafar
is not
directly expressed in words but is learnt from the
(helped by other clauses) made of it then the assertion
(啶掂た啶оぞ啶ㄠ啶班啶い啶�) [惫颈诲丑腻苍补办补谤尘补迟腻) ] is only implied (啶嗋ぐ啷嵿ぅ啷�). [腻谤迟丑墨). ] But when it is directly
expressed, it is verbal (a). In the first case viz. when
the
assertion is not made but is understood by the
negation
of it, the 啶嗋啷嵿し啷囙お [腻办峁辫补 ] is 啶掂啷嵿し啷嵿く啶ぞ啶｀さ啶苦し啶�. [惫补办峁补尘腻峁嘺惫颈峁测补. ] In the second case
it is
啶夃啷嵿い啶掂た啶粪く.
啶掂た啶掂啶むた啶曕ぞ啶班-啶掂た啶掂啷嵿し啶苦い啶む啶掂ぐ啷傕お啶� 啶掂た啶о啶い啷嵿さ啶い啷嵿ぐ啷囙し啷嵿啶む啶掂ぎ啷� 啷� 啶む啶� 啶掂た啶о啶じ啷嵿く啶距さ啶多啶� 啶啶曕啶むた啶曕啶班た啶ぞ-
啶膏啶さ啶距う啶班啶ムい啷嵿さ啷�
啶多ぞ啶啶︵い啷嵿さ啷� 啶� 啶膏い啶�
啶︵啶掂啶掂た啶о啶ぎ啷� 啷�
[耻办迟补惫颈峁测补.
惫颈惫峁泃颈办腻谤补岣�-vivak峁tatvar奴pa峁� vidheyatvamatre峁ａ弓atvam | tena vidheyasy膩va艣ya muktikriy膩-
蝉补峁僢丑补惫腻诲补谤迟丑补迟惫别
艣膩bdatve ca sati
dvaividhyam |
] P. 32, LL. 15-16-Y ANNETH | 鈥�
啶ぞ啶灌ぞ啶む啶啶ぎ啷� 啷�
[m膩h膩tmyam |
] "Oh, the
greatness of the God of love that even Rudra should be
reduced to
such a plight! (Or) let us forbear, what are
we to
measure off the water of the occan by pitchers ?"
This is
啶掂啷嵿し啷嵿く啶ぞ啶｀さ啶苦し啶� 啶嗋啷嵿し啷囙お. [vak峁am膩峁嘺vi峁ya 腻办峁辫补. ] Here the 啶掂た啶оた啶む啶膏た啶むぞ啶班啶� [惫颈诲丑颈迟蝉颈迟腻谤迟丑补 ] or 啶掂啷嵿い啷佮ぎ啶苦し啷嵿 啶呧ぐ啷嵿ぅ [惫补办迟耻尘颈峁ａ弓补 artha ] is
啶え啷嵿ぎ啶ムぎ啶距す啶距い啷嵿ぎ啷嵿く啶 啶むう啶掂じ啷嵿ぅ啶距さ啶苦ざ啷囙し啶啶曕啶むぎ啷�. [尘补苍尘补迟丑补尘腻丑腻迟尘测补m tadavasth膩惫颈艣别峁yuktam. ] Here 啶ㄠた啶粪啶� [苍颈峁诲丑补 ] is expressed by words
啶囙く啶︵ぞ啶膏啶むぞ啶 [颈测补诲腻蝉迟腻尘 ] '
let us forbear. The 啶ㄠた啶粪啶� [苍颈峁诲丑补 ] is made because the
啶え啷嵿ぎ啶ムぎ啶距す啶距い啷嵿ぎ啷嵿く [尘补苍尘补迟丑补尘腻丑腻迟尘测补 ] and its 啶掂た啶多啶� [惫颈艣别峁] s are impossible of description on
