Essay name: Paumacariya (critical study)
Author:
K. R. Chandra
Affiliation: Research institute of Prakrit, Jainology and Ahimsa Vaishali
This is a critical study of the Paumacariya: the earliest Jain version of Rama's life story, written in Prakrit by Vimalasuri dating to the 4th century AD. In this text, Rama (referred to as Padma) is depicted with lotus-like eyes and a blooming face. The Paumacariya places emphasis on the human aspects of characters rooted in Jain values, contrasting with the divine portrayal in Valmiki’s version.
Page 388 of: Paumacariya (critical study)
388 (of 671)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
SOCIAL CONDITIONS 359 on the death of her husband are also abandoning me"". The same
state of helplessness is evidenced by AparÄjitÄ when her son, RÄma
goes into exile². Kaikeyi had demanded the coronation of Bharata
for the same reason. Bharata wanted to renounce the world along
with his father. Kaikeyī could not face this unhappy situation. She
got gripped with severe agony. She thought of a plan to avert the
situation. She demanded the coronation of Bharata so that she would
not be separated at least from her son³. Dasaratha himself told RÄma
that Kaikeyī was likely to die in separation from Bharata. The above
evidences prove that women lived in dependency. After the loss of her
husband, her son could prevent her from falling victim to a miserable
life, but the real happiness of her life depended on her husband, there-
fore we find that a woman regarded her husband as her lord and
address the husband as 'SvÄmin' and 'NÄtha'.
B. Social status or Women outside the House.
A very
intensive trait of fickle-
the character of woman.
Inherent traits of Women :-A
mindedness (capalatÄ) is associated with
Thus Sitä though faultless yet at the time of being abandoned in
the forest tells Ká¹›tÄntavadana that women are fickle-minded (94.74).
On account of her frailty a woman loses her far-sightedness and
becomes the slave of her natural instinct. Kaiheyi's demand of
coronating Bharata was of this type. She was promised a boon and
it was duly fulfilled by Dasaratha with the consent of RÄma and
Lakṣmaṇa. But Kaikeyi had not that wisdom and farsighted-
what
to think in advance as to
would be its consequences.
She wanted to keep Bharata along with her and by the pretext o
the boon she became successful. When RÄma and Laká¹£maṇa went into
exile their mothers got distressed and even Kaikeyī could not bear the
agony of her co-wives. Therefore, she had to send Bharata and had to
proceed herself to call them back. But the promise was promise, the
words were words and RÄma did not return inspite of Kaikeyï's
entreaties. There she had to admit her fickle-mindedness and lack of
foresight.
ness
1. Bhattaravirahiyae, putta Älambaṇam mahiliye, honti iha jÄ«valoe, cattÄ tehiá¹�
pi pÄvÄh aá¹�
75.SO.
2. Puttaya kim me pariccayasi......... hosii puttÄlambo, pÄroho ceva sÄhÄe 31.96,
97; paiputtavirahiyÄ iha kaá¹� saraṇamahaá¹� pavajjÄmi 31.99.
31.63-64.
5.
4. Tassa viogammi kegaï marai 31.75.
5. Mahila sahÄvacavalÄ, adihapehi sahavamÄillÄ, tam me khamÄhi puttaya, jaá¹�
paá¸ikÅ«lam kayaá¹� tujjha â€�32.51.
