365betÓéÀÖ

Essay name: Paumacariya (critical study)

Author: K. R. Chandra
Affiliation: Research institute of Prakrit, Jainology and Ahimsa Vaishali

This is a critical study of the Paumacariya: the earliest Jain version of Rama's life story, written in Prakrit by Vimalasuri dating to the 4th century AD. In this text, Rama (referred to as Padma) is depicted with lotus-like eyes and a blooming face. The Paumacariya places emphasis on the human aspects of characters rooted in Jain values, contrasting with the divine portrayal in Valmiki’s version.

Page 381 of: Paumacariya (critical study)

Page:

381 (of 671)


External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)


Download the PDF file of the original publication


Warning! Page nr. 381 has not been proofread.

352
A CRITICAL STUDY OF PAUMACARIYAM
they were educated in the Vedas and other branches of knowledge.¹
The Kamasutra lays down that the wife of a 'nÄgaraka' should
keep accounts of daily house-hold and it also speaks of 64 subsidiary
sciences meant for women and their knowledge in belles letters.2
That the girls were permitted to receive education out side their
home is evidenced in the Uttara-RÄmacarita which mentions female
students studying with brother pupils at the residenee of their
teachers.3
The parents took due care in marrying their daughters to proper
persons. The preceding section on 'marriage' reveals the following facts
in this connection parents did their best in selecting a suitable husband
for their daughter. The future happiness and well-being of a girl
depended solely upon the type of the bridegroom to whom she was
wedded. Therefore the parents first considered the family, character,
health and the attainments of the candidate and then married their
daughter to him. Maturity and full youth were the proper qualifications
for a marriage; the wishes of the daughter were respected; and the
guardians readily opposed those who wanted to marry their daughters
forcibly.
The parents are referred to be in anxiety for the marriage of
their daughters (15.36; 35.11). But this anxiety was for selecting
proper candidates and not that they considered the presence of a
daughter to be a misfortune The comparison of a daughter with the
wealth of wicked person, and the disparaging remarks about her at
6 20 really do not undermine her position and abuse the character
of girls but they convey the idea that whatever affection and love one
may bestow on his daughter 5, after all she will become useful and
helpful to some other person. Therefore it is said that to serve some
other family is the very nature of the women. And it is true that one
cannot keep one's daughter with him for ever. One has to marry and
send her to some other house. The RÄká¹£asa and Ä€sura type of marriage
speak of the kidnapping of and selling of girls to other persons. These
practices sound indicent on the part of the kidnapper and the seller.
Moreover thay belittle the position of girls in the society. But really
speaking these were the prevailing customs of marriage in those days
1. See Indra, p. 140f,
2. Chakladar, pp. 175-81.
3:
See Indra, p. 134.
4. Sutthu vi rakkhijjanti, thuthukkiyaá¹� rakkhiyÄ pÄyatteṇaá¹�/
hohi parasovatthÄ, khalayaṇariddhi va varakanÄ//â€�6: 22.
5. Paragehasevanaá¹� cicya, esa sahÄvo mahiliyÄṇaá¹� 6, 22

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: