Essay name: The Nyaya theory of Knowledge
Author:
Satischandra Chatterjee
Affiliation: University of Calcutta / Department of Philosophy
This essay studies the Nyaya theory of Knowledge and examines the contributions of the this system to Indian and Western philosophy, specifically focusing on its epistemology. Nyaya represents a realist approach, providing a critical evaluation of knowledge.
Page 339 of: The Nyaya theory of Knowledge
339 (of 404)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
324
NYAYA THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE
I
its parts and have a fixed order in the whole. It is a unity of
the parts in so far as it is the object of a single cognition.
The question as to how the constituents of a word are syn-
thesised so as to form one whole, will be considered later on.
2. Words and their meanings
A word is defined as a group of letters arranged in a fixed
order. This definition, however, has in view the existence or
the constitution of a word. The essential nature of a word
lies in its meaning." Logically a word is a sound that bears a
certain meaning. The meaning of a word consists in its rela-
tion to the object which it signifies. A word may have
different meanings according to the different ways in which it
may be related to an object. According to the NaiyÄyikas,
there are three kinds of meaning of a word, namely, abhidhÄ,
paribhÄá¹£Ä� and laká¹£aṇÄ�." Let us here consider these different
kinds of meaning of a word.
By abhidha is meant the primary meaning of a word. It
is also called Sakyartha, vacyÄrtha and mukhyÄrtha. The
relation between a word and its meaning may be either sanketa
or laká¹£anÄ. Sanketa is the direct relation between a word and
its meaning, such that the knowledge of the word leads imme-
diately to the knowledge of its relation to that meaning. Now
sanketa or the direct relation between a word and its meaning
may be either eternal or non-eternal. When eternal and un-
changing, it is called Sakti or the inherent potency of a word.
Thus the relation between the word jar and the object called
jar is a direct and eternal relation called śakti. This śakti or
potency of a word is due to the will of God which ordains that
such and such a word should mean such and such an object.
According to the MÄ«mÄinsakas, the sakti of a word is its natural
relation to the object which it significs. Just as fire possesses
the power of burning, so words possess a natural potency to
1 Padari ca varṇasamūha�, etc., TB., p. 14.
2 (f. 'padam ca varṇasamühaá¸�' (TarkabhÄá¹£Ä�, p. 14), 'saktaá¹� padam'
(Tarkasaṃgraha, p. 64).
3 Vide SabdaÅ›akti-prakÄÅ›ikÄ, Introduction (C. U. Edn.).
