Essay name: Svacchandatantra (history and structure)
Author: William James Arraj
The essay represents a study and partial English translation of the Svacchandatantra and its commentary, “Uddyota�, by Kshemaraja. The text, attributed to the deity Svacchanda-bhairava, has various names and demonstrates a complex history of transmission through diverse manuscript traditions in North India, Nepal, and beyond.
Page 355 of: Svacchandatantra (history and structure)
355 (of 511)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
348
Svacchandatantram by references to the PÅ«rvaÅ›Ästram. The
change in his commentary may reflect the divergence at this point
between the two texts, which though still exhibiting general
parallels, differ in particulars. Both discuss the emergence of the
celestial eye, for example, but each presents a different basis for
the meditation on matter. Although for the first time mentioning
a duration for the exercise, in the style of the Pūrvaśastram, the
text, for example, gives a different length. 1
In addition, Ká¹£emarÄjaá¸� redirects his commentary in order
to concentrate on reinterpreting the statements of the text on the
nature of matter and of the soul. Breaking with the apparent
sense of the text, he interprets, for example, the declaration that
the exercise related to matter is the highest (para�) exercise
which causes liberation to mean that the exercise causing liberation
is beyond (para�) the exercise related to matter. 2 In the same
way, he takes the subsequent description of the person or soul
(pp. 50-55) as if a separate meditation, although the text appears
to connect the section on the person to the preceding meditation on
matter. 3
In this section, the text describes the person as a subtle,
pure consciousness, which lacks the normal attributes of objects,
and which resides in the lotus of the heart. It animates the body,
experiences pleasure and pain, and undergoes transmigration.
1 V. M.K. Shastri, ed., MÄlinÄ«vijayottaratantram 16, vs. 14,
p. 104, where the celestial eye emerges in three years:
"divyacaká¹£uranÄyÄsÄtsiddhiá¸� syÄdvatsaratrayÄt.
�
2 V. p.50, vs. 104b, and commentary: "mokṣakara� para�, '
para iti mÄyÄkhyaá¸� praká¹›teá¸� sÄká¹£ÄtkÄrayogÄdapi para uktaá¸�.â€�
3 As an example of a theistic meditation where matter
represents the highest level v. BhÄgavatapurÄṇam 2, 2, vss. 22-38,
in Sastri, KṛṣṇaÅ›ankara, et al., eds., SrimadbhÄgavatapurÄṇam
1(2): 85ff. There in a progressive ascent through the planes of the
universe, the adept becomes united with the supreme self and
liberated when he surpasses matter.
