365bet娱乐

The title 鈥淯bhay膩bhis膩rik膩鈥� was justified by T. Venkatacharya (1967, Ubhay膩bhis膩rik膩 with translation, Introduction). He states that 鈥渢he word 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻鈥� is generally formed by adding the agent-suffix 鈥�峁噕耻濒鈥�, either to the ordinary root 鈥�蝉峁�鈥� with 鈥�abhi鈥� or to its causative stemand it stands for one of the heroines (苍腻测颈办腻蝉).

The Da艣ar奴paka says,

k膩m膩rt膩bhisaret k膩ntam, s膩rayedv膩bhis膩rik膩
  鈥揇a艣ar奴paka.II.27

鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻鈥� is one who is eager to love, goes to her lover or makes him come to her鈥�.

狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补 states,

hitv膩 lajj膩m tu y膩 艣li峁ａ弓膩 madena madanena ca, 补产丑颈蝉腻谤补测补迟别 k膩ntam s膩 bhaved 补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻
  鈥摫纺遽弓y补艣腻蝉迟谤补.XXIV.116.

鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻 is one who due to love or lust is attracted to her lover shamelessly goes out to meet the lover鈥�

Thus Bharata records only the second alternative of the two mentioned in Da艣ar奴paka, whereas Amarasi峁僪a notes the first when he [says the following, though he is not dealing with the 苍腻测颈办腻蝉 of the dramas],

鈥�k膩nt膩rthini tu y膩 测腻迟颈 sa峁卥etam s膩bhis膩rik膩
  鈥�础尘补谤补办辞峁�a.滨滨.惭补苍耻峁�y补惫补谤驳补.10.

鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻 is that who goes to the rendezvous place for lover鈥�.

础产丑颈苍补惫补产丑腻谤补迟墨鈥檚 comment on the above verse of the 狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补 thus, 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻 is a helper, who allows to pass the lover by his matter: (补产丑颈蝉补谤补岣� 蝉补丑腻测补岣� tasya vy膩p膩re峁嘺 priyatamam atikr膩mati)鈥� that 鈥�karoti tad 膩ca峁ａ弓e ten膩tikr膩mati鈥�. Here a denominative verb 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤补测补迟别鈥� is derived by him from the noun 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤补鈥� (a friend or a helper), which is the causative formation of the root 鈥�蝉峁�鈥� with 鈥�abhi鈥�.

In the case of the title Ubhay膩bhis膩rik膩, the first part (ubhaya) of the compound, may be interpreted to mean either that:

鈥淪he goes to meet both (her lover and his friend, the 痴颈峁璦)鈥� or that 鈥渟he causes both of them to go out in search of her.鈥�

However, the first interpretation is not tenable in the present case, as she does not set out to meet both of them. Therefore, the word 鈥�ubhaya鈥� in the title becomes meaningless, as it does not refer to the actual situation depicted in the play. Further, the second part of the compound, 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻鈥� may be interpreted to mean that either she goes to meet only her lover or she goes to meet both lover and friend. However, since she goes to meet her lover only, mere 补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻 as the title would have perhaps been proper in that case. Again, it does not seem to fit well with the causative alternative of the definition, for that matter. As described in the text, both the lovers have started on their own accord in search of each other, because of the compelling effects of the seasonand by chance they meet in front of the house of Vi艣膩vasudatta; the 惫墨峁嚹� teacher. After having spent the night, only the next morning, the girl sends word for the 痴颈峁璦; and that too has nothing to do with the purpose of her meeting her love; which had already taken place. She does not make any efforts to cause the lover to meet her.

Therefore, even mere 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻鈥� as the title would not be proper, if the causative idea of the definition were to be considered, not to speak of the full title Ubhay膩bhis膩rik膩. Thus, the definition of 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻鈥� given by the writers on dramaturgy leaves us in the lurch in the case of the Ubhay膩bhis膩rik膩. I think in the present case, 鈥�补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻鈥� is used in the sense of 补产丑颈蝉补谤补峁嘺尘 (not in the sense of agent) and the expression ubhayor 补产丑颈蝉腻谤颈办腻 in the sense of 鈥渁llow to go out of both the lovers to meet each other,鈥� ubhayor 补产丑颈蝉补谤补峁嘺尘and the same is used for the title of the work. The word thus derived by 峁噕耻濒 is only in feminine gender, whereas 耻产丑补测腻产丑颈蝉补谤补峁嘺尘, which may also mean the same, is only in neuter. I prefer the title in feminine is justified by the prominence given to the feminine characters in the drama. Except in one case of Dhanamitra, all the conversations of the 痴颈峁璦, which constitute the bulk of the play, are only those with feminine personalities. Hence the title is Ubhay膩bhis膩rik膩.鈥�