365betÓéÀÖ

Essay name: Bhasa (critical and historical study)

Author: A. D. Pusalker

This book studies Bhasa, the author of thirteen plays ascribed found in the Trivandrum Sanskrit Series. These works largely adhere to the rules of traditional Indian theatrics known as Natya-Shastra.

Page 127 of: Bhasa (critical and historical study)

Page:

127 (of 564)


External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)


Download the PDF file of the original publication


Warning! Page nr. 127 has not been proofread.

107
not trustworthy, as said by Krishnamacharya. Now, one
Ghaá¹­akarpara Kavya by Ghaá¹­akarpara Kavi has been
published by the Venkateshwar Press, and it must be the
same work as referred to by Narayana Sastri, since the
last verse etc. as quoted by the learned Sastri
occurs in the book as No. 22, and
etc., alleged
to be quoted in the KavyÄnusÄsana, also finds its place as
No. 9 in the book. But this Ghaá¹­akarpara Kavya does
not appear to be the work of BhÄsa, the author of our
plays. The identity between him and Ghaá¹­akarpara is
yet to be established as the argument rests on very flimsy
grounds. Further, even if the same be proved, we shall
have to take him as another BhÄsa, since the matter and
manner of the book are strongly against the authorship
of BhÄsa, the writer of our plays. It is full of
ÅšabdÄlamkÄras and Yamakas, end and middle rhymes,-
and it will be readily accepted that BhÄsa is quite
innocent of such devices. With BhÄsa the tendency to use
alliteration, rhyming, and other figures of words is the
exception rather than the rule. The similes and metaphors
from the sphere of Sá¹›ngÄra employed in the KÄvya are
of such a nature as to preclude the possibility of their
having ever been composed by BhÄsa. Too much
attention towards the outer form and word-jugglery were
the characteristics of the later age and hence the
Ghaá¹­akarpara cannot be ascribed to our BhÄsa. It will
be noted, further, that none of the verses praising BhÄsa
mention Yamaka as his characteristic.
Mr. Guleri pointed out the existence of "A poem
by BhÄsa", its name being fan (plural). This has been
inferred from a verse in the Prthvirajavijaya by
JayÄnaka (12th century A. D.)
सतà¥à¤•ावà¥à¤¯à¤¸à¤‚हारविधà¥� खलानां
दीपà¥à¤¤à¤¾à¤¨à¤¿ वहà¥à¤¨à¥‡à¤°à¤ªà¤¿ मानसानà¤� à¥�
भाससà¥à¤¯ कावà¥à¤¯à¤‚ खलà¥� विषà¥à¤£à¥à¤§à¤°à¥à¤®à¤¾à¤¨à¥� ( [satkÄvyasaṃhÄravidhau khalÄnÄá¹�
dÄ«ptÄni vahnerapi mÄnasÄni |
bhÄsasya kÄvyaá¹� khalu viṣṇudharmÄn (
]
?)
सोऽपà¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤¨à¤¨à¤¾à¤¤à¥à¤ªà¤¾à¤°à¤¤à¤µà¤¨à¥à¤®à¥à¤®à¥‹à¤š à¥�
[so'pyÄnanÄtpÄratavanmumoca ||
]
JonarÄja (15th century A. D.), while commenting
on the verse, refers, inter alia, to the competition between
BhÄsa and Vyasa and the fire-ordeal, incidentally
mentioning BhÄsa as BhÄsa Muni. Dr. T. Ganapati
Sastri proposed an emendation by reading fan for
1 IA, 42, pp. 52-53.
હા હà«àª� બેઠી àª� વધà«� àª�

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: