Atharvaveda and Charaka Samhita
by Laxmi Maji | 2021 | 143,541 words
This page relates ‘Caraka (Ayurveda scholar)� found in the study on diseases and remedies found in the Atharvaveda and Charaka-samhita. These texts deal with Ayurveda—the ancient Indian Science of life—which lays down the principles for keeping a sound health involving the use of herbs, roots and leaves. The Atharvaveda refers to one of the four Vedas (ancient Sanskrit texts encompassing all kinds of knowledge and science) containing many details on Ayurveda, which is here taken up for study.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Caraka (Āܰ岹 scholar)
Caraka—Scholars differ as to who was Caraka. It is a matter of debate among most scholars as to whether a particular person will be accepted by the word of Caraka. According to most scholars, Caraka is the name of a branch of ṛṣṇa Yajurveda. And the people of this branch community are called Caraka. Therefore, any person associated with this Vedic branch is the author of the 䲹첹-ṃh. Again, some scholars have associated the word of Caraka with Bauddhacārikā. Which means itinerant. The name of a branch of the Atharvaveda is ‘Vaidyacāraṇa� which is not available recently. Maybe Āܰ岹 had a special relationship with it, and Caraka originated from ṇa. There were two types of sages -decent and nomadic. The first type of sage used to build a hut and the second type of sage used to go around. This shows that Caraka was a nomadic sage who did not stay in one place.
According to another, Caraka is the incarnation of the Śṣa-岵. It is written in the manifestation that when Lord վṣṇ incarnated as a fish, Anantadeva received Āܰ岹 under the Atharvaveda. He was distressed to see the creatures of the earth afflicted by disease and appeared as the son of a sage named Ṣaḍaṅgabettā to alleviate the plight of the people. He became famous as Caraka as he appeared on earth in the form of �Cara�. According to many scholars, Caraka and Patañjali are the same people. Because both of them have written commentaries. But a closer look at their writings reveals that this judgment is not correct. The famous Buddhist poet Aśvaghoṣa was the royal poet of Ծṣk. His two most famous works are Buddhacarita and Saundarānanda. There is a discussion about Āܰ岹 in two Kāvyas. From the description of Aśvaghoṣa, it seems that he used the Caraka-ṃh, but he did not mention Caraka’s name.
Mentioned the name of the main advisor�
�vālmīkirādau ca sasarja padya� jagrantha yanna cyavano maharṣi� |
cikitsita� yacca cakāra nātri� paścāttadātreya ṛṣirjagāda ||�[1]
From this, it is understood that Caraka was before Aśvaghoṣa. Judging by the interrelationship between Caraka and Suśruta, it can be said that the original version of Suśruta preceded the 䲹첹-ṃh but the second version was after the Caraka ṃh. Caraka was first quoted by Vāgbhaṭṭa. Vāgbhaṭṭa's first work was a collection of ṣṭṅg-ṃg, following Suśruta and Vāgbhaṭṭa's second work was a collection of ṣṭṅg-ṃg, following Caraka. From this, it is understood that during the time of Vāgbhaṭṭa (6th Century) the fame and recognition of Caraka became codified. At this time Bhaṭṭāra ᲹśԻ took the task of interpreting this book into his own hands. Before this, Maharṣi Caraka, as the author of the Carak ṃh, was not used in this sense in all works, but in another sense.
It is not possible to determine at what time Munivara Caraka appeared. However, it can be said with certainty that he was born before the advent of Vaiyākaraṇa Maharṣi Pāṇini. Because Pāṇini in his grammar book ‘Aṣṭādhyāyī� -�첹ṭaܰ첹� has fixed a form of this formula, in �carakenaproktamadhīyateyetecarakā� |� -in this place there is a �luk� of the suffix �nimi� after the word Caraka. Seeing this, European archaeologists speculate that Caraka here means the disciples of Caraka. If this assumption is true, then Panini appeared more than four hundred and two thousand years before the present time. That is, Maharṣi Caraka is ahead of them. Dr Dasgupta acknowledges Caraka as a contemporary of Ծṣk. The period of Caraka (2nd BC) is supposed to be contemporary with the period of Sunga. Because this is also the time of writing Pātañjala Mahābhāṣya and Yogasūtra. That is, we can put Caraka before this book. We find in the Caraka Samhita the source of the words which are mentioned in the Mahābhāṣya and Sāṅkhyakārikā, which are the direct obstacles.
Sri Gurupada Haldar speaks of two Carakas -one a disciple of Vaiśampāyana and the other a royal physician of Ծṣk. He also admitted the name of the second Caraka as Kapilbala. According to Dr C. Kunhan Raja, the word Caraka seems to be a Pahlavi language, not Sanskrit. The Caraka-Samhita was translated into the Pahlavi language in the early centuries of this period. Therefore, the period of Caraka can be called the second BC. According to the signs of social and religious conditions found in the Caraka ṃh, the Caraka can be placed in the line between the Śṅgkāla or Maurya Śṅg period[2].
Āⲹ ṛḍ is famous as a reformer of the great book of Caraka- ṃh, the great book of Ayurvedic medicine. One-third of the 䲹첹-ṃh was not available at that time. Which the ṛḍ completed by combining the Sutras based on another Tantra. In this way, he completed sixteen chapters of 侱쾱ٲٳԲ, twelve chapters of Kalpa sthāna and completed Siddhi sthāna. He provided the terminology of Sanskrit. Dṛḍhavala was a resident of Kashmir. His father's name was Kapilbala. The fourth century of the Gupta period is considered to be the period of ṛḍ. According to Harnell , ṛḍ and Vāgbhaṭṭa II appeared between the seventh and ninth centuries[3].
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
(BC�1/43); Buddhacarita� Canto–I by Aśvaghoṣa, trans. Jayashree Chattopadhyay, Kolkata, Sanskrit Pustaka Bhandara, 2007, p. 31.
[2]: