365bet娱乐

础濒补峁僰腻谤补艣腻蝉迟谤补 in Sanskrit literature deals with the external and internal elements of the 鈥�kavikarmas鈥� or poet鈥檚 creation. It is closely related to the Western conception of Rhetoric and Aesthetics.

A systematic treatment of the rhetorical issues of Sanskrit literature is not available in the age of Vedic literature. Though we can trace the word 鈥�耻辫补尘腻鈥� in the 峁歬惫别诲补 and in the 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺蝉 and earlier 鲍辫补苍颈峁�a诲补蝉 but they were used from the point of view of the general notion of similitude. The 狈颈驳丑补苍峁璾 and the Nirukta books throw light upon the frequent usage of simile in the Vedic literature. But these instances do not indicate to the presence of a systematic treatise on rhetoric in Vedic times.

The first systematic treatment on Sanskrit Rhetoric can be found in the N膩tya艣膩stra of Bharata. The discipline of Sanskrit Rhetoric was successively nourished and nurtured by the doctrines of rhetoricians like 叠丑腻尘补丑补, 顿补峁囜笉颈苍, 痴腻尘补苍补, 鲍诲产丑补峁璦, 搁耻诲谤补峁璦, Ruyyaka and so on.

Sanskrit rhetoric is broadly divided into two categories according to their direction of treatment and presentation of central subject-matter. These categories are鈥�

(a) Dramaturgy (狈腻峁瓂补艣腻蝉迟谤补) or works based on the structure, origin and development of Sanskrit dramas.

(b) Poetics (碍腻惫测补艣腻蝉迟谤补) or works based on the structure, origin and development of Sanskrit poetry.

The 碍腻惫测腻濒补峁僰腻谤补蝉奴迟谤补惫峁泃迟颈 of 痴腻尘补苍补 can be promptly categorised as a treatise on Sanskrit Poetics or 碍腻惫测补艣腻蝉迟谤补. It deals with the various aspects of a 鈥�办腻惫测补鈥� such as the necessity of poetry, the soul of poetry, the constituents of poetry, the idea of 谤墨迟颈, 补濒补峁僰腻谤补, 诲辞峁�a, 驳耻峁嘺 etc and their broad divisions. It also throws light upon some of the practical methods of composing good poetry. Thus the work of 痴腻尘补苍补 can be regarded as a hand-book of Sanskrit Poetics in a wider sense.