Essay name: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
Author:
Lance Edward Nelson
Affiliation: McMaster University / Religious Studies
This is a study and English translation of the Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati (16th century)—one of the greatest and most vigorous exponents of Advaita after Shankara-Acharya who was also a great devotee of Krishna. The Bhaktirasayana attempts to merge non-dualist metaphysics with the ecstatic devotion of the Bhagavata Purana, by asserting that Bhakti is the highest goal of life and by arguinng that Bhakti embodies God within the devotee's mind.
Page 497 of: Bhakti-rasayana by Madhusudana Sarasvati
497 (of 553)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
NOTES: CHAPTER SEVEN 485 Its
devotion to those based on ordinary worldly emotions.
excellence, relative to the rasas of the aestheticians, is
like the light of the sun compared to that of a firefly (BR
2.77). See chap. 6.5.
176 One of the six orthodox systems of Hindu
philosophy, the Sāmkhya is based upon an dichotomy between
spirit and matter. There are a multiplicity of spirit-
monads (purusas), which, prior to mokṣa, are caught up in
bondage through association with matter (prakṛti). Matter
in its primal state is composed of the three material
"qualities" (gunas) in undifferentiated equilibrium; when
this equilibrium is disturbed, primal matter begins to
unfold in various directions, manifesting the universe.
Everything except pure spirit is a product of primal matter.
This includes mind as well as physical objects. All things,
therefore, derive their individual characteristics from the
material qualities, which produce them by combining in
varying proportions.
�
Patanjali's Yoga, regarded by the tradition as the
sister system of Sāmkhya, accepts the ontology of the latter
almost completely, making only a few changes such as the
addition of its own concept of Isvara, a sort of eternally
liberated purusa.
The Advaita Vedanta, though differing
radically in many respects from the same, also owes much
to its influence* Collapse the multiplicity of purusas
into
one ātman, for example, and reduce prakṛti to a real-unreal
Māyā which is dependent upon the ātman, and one begins to
come very close to the non-dualist metaphysic. Advaita has
borrowed the guna doctrine from the Sāmkhya and much of its
psychology as well. Therefore, as Madhusudana expounds the
rasa theory from the point of view of that system, he can
find himself in agreement with much of what is said,
excepting of course such items as the criticism of the
Advaita doctrine of Brahman (commentary on stanza 15) and
the minor point about the composition of the mind
(commentary on stanza 20).
11 177 The gunas, literally "strands" or "qualities,
are the three basic factors that make up (prakṛti), primal
matter. They pervade creation, the evolute of prakṛti, in
all its aspects, mental and physical. The principle of
creativity and luminosity is sattva, the "luminous quality";
the principle of activity and passion is rajas, the "active
quality"; and that of destruction and inertia is tamas, the
"inert quality." As specified in the text, a predominance
of these in the mind is associated, respectively, with the
manifestation therein of happiness (sukha), suffering
(duhkha), or delusion (moha). Each of the terms sattva,
rajas, and tamas has an extraordinarily wide range of
meaning, so the reader is asked to be aware of the
-
